RE: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-18 Thread Jeff Schnitzer
Subject: Re: Business-Oriented XML Hi, Jeff. I'm with Jon here: Why the heck would you want to do this? See previous reply. In addition, languages come and go. Remember when TurboPascal was hot? QuickBASIC? C and C++? Perl? PHP? What happens in 5 years when another awesome

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-17 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/17/01 11:07 AM, Dave Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Turbine is coupled to Java. It's not easy to use any particular database (e.g., an entire help section on how to integrate Oracle). With BOX, you set the default database with a straightforward configuration file:

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-17 Thread Dave Jarvis
Hi, Jon. Jon Stevens wrote: Ok. Now you are getting personal (by comparing to Turbine) and making a complete fool of yourself with your ridiculous FUD statements. I believe Jeff asked me how BOX compares with other technologies. I'm pointing out some aspects where I believe BOX to be better

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-17 Thread Peter Donald
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001 11:03, Dave Jarvis wrote: Hello, Pete. punts on database neutrality and just prays that the SQL between databases is identical. And of course everyone who has worked with SQL knows that this is far from being true. You got me on this one. If you write SQL using

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-16 Thread Jon Stevens
on 11/16/01 8:58 PM, Dave Jarvis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sql select * FROM WIC.FOURNIS WHERE COD_CLIENT=? ORDER BY NOM_FOURNIS /select using value-of expr=#WIC_CLIENT/ /using container name=results/ /sql Why the heck would you want to

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-16 Thread Dave Jarvis
Hello, again. Neeme Praks wrote: Have you ever had a look at Apache Cocoon project? That achieves all the Yes. benefits you outlined in your paper plus more. Here are a few items BOX addresses that Cocoon does not (as far as I can discern; please correct my errors): o doesn't

Re: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-16 Thread Jeff Turner
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 08:58:06PM -0800, Dave Jarvis wrote: Hello, again. Neeme Praks wrote: Have you ever had a look at Apache Cocoon project? That achieves all the Yes. benefits you outlined in your paper plus more. Here are a few items BOX addresses that Cocoon does not (as

BOX: Business-Oriented XML

2001-11-15 Thread Dave Jarvis
Hello, Using Tomcat, Xalan, Xerces, and Java-based technologies, I have developed a system that completely decouples presentation from business logic. I would like to discuss the system and the possibility of adding it to the technologies offered by the Apache Foundation. Please find a brief