Re: J2EE considered harmful (was [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml])

Tim, BRAVO. Daniel -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: J2EE considered harmful (was [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml])

> I have implemented a system using Container Managed EntityBeans that > worked fairly well. I used Jonas (it was some time ago). It > was smaller > than the original poster example (about 20 entity classes, tens of > thousands of instances). I spent a lot of time getting the > entity desi

Re: J2EE considered harmful (was [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml])

Andrew C. Oliver wrote: >To be fair, WebSphere is probably more troublesome then the other >containers (at least thats been my experience with it). I do think >there is a time and place for RPC. I however think better support for >location independence is required. > (snip) > >I would sugges

Re: J2EE considered harmful (was [Fwd: cvs commit: jakarta-site2/xdocs index.xml])

I've been lurking on this list for several years, and not speaking about things I'm not contributing to. But Andy's comment here about EJB & J2EE goes right to the point, and triggers my passion ... As an architect, I've been in 5 projects in the last 2.5 years where EJBs were on the table, and