I'll break my "no-me-too-posts" rule for this occasion:
> Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, Thank you.
>
> Did I miss anyone? Great job, guys.
Definately. Thanks.
- Leo
guess I can deinstall the .net development kit again...for now =)
(and in the line of 'met too's --
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:00, Jason Hunter wrote:
> > Peter Donald wrote:
> > > Wow this is absolutely fabulous - not what I expected to see - yea!!!
> > >
> > > If some one would bug them to include JMX in their "soon to be blessed"
> > > list then everything that we do at A
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> > What we must do is make sure that all the libraries implementing JCP
> > specs that we decide to use do get and pass their TCKs.
> >
> > That includes openJMX for tomcat, probably others ( openJMX is probably
> > the most important for most server si
> Sun offered slightly more than we required by granting a large budget
> for TCK support when we only required binary access. Sun did this
> because they felt support was essential for success, given the current
> test suites and their design. It may be the first time I've seen Sun
> give more
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 22:02, James Duncan Davidson wrote:
> On 3/22/02 18:49, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I can tell you probably don't own a copy of Dr. Strangelove eh?
>
> Actually no, I never read it. Darn, I hate missing the inside jokes. :)
>
Its a Stanley Kubrick
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002 16:00, Jason Hunter wrote:
> Peter Donald wrote:
> > Wow this is absolutely fabulous - not what I expected to see - yea!!!
> >
> > If some one would bug them to include JMX in their "soon to be blessed"
> > list then everything that we do at Apache would be legal - woooh!
>
Peter Donald wrote:
>
> Wow this is absolutely fabulous - not what I expected to see - yea!!!
>
> If some one would bug them to include JMX in their "soon to be blessed" list
> then everything that we do at Apache would be legal - woooh!
I'll pass that on.
-jh-
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
James Duncan Davidson wrote:
>
> On 3/22/02 14:50, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm still not going to open a bottle of champagne, we need to see that LOI
> > in action, but it's definitely good news...
>
> I'm cautiously optimistic. The devil is in the details, but we've t
> What we must do is make sure that all the libraries implementing JCP
> specs that we decide to use do get and pass their TCKs.
>
> That includes openJMX for tomcat, probably others ( openJMX is probably
> the most important for most server side projects ).
Yes indeed. The biggest problem with t
On 3/22/02 18:49, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can tell you probably don't own a copy of Dr. Strangelove eh?
Actually no, I never read it. Darn, I hate missing the inside jokes. :)
|* x180:james duncan davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] *|
|* http://www.x18
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 21:49, James Duncan Davidson wrote:
> On 3/22/02 18:15, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be somewhat awkwardly amusing if they withdrew it right
> > after JavaOne is finished then again... I have a sick sense of humor.
>
> It wouldn't be amus
On 3/22/02 18:15, "Andrew C. Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be somewhat awkwardly amusing if they withdrew it right
> after JavaOne is finished then again... I have a sick sense of humor.
It wouldn't be amusing. It would simply result in Apache leaving the JCP.
Then it would b
On Fri, 2002-03-22 at 17:50, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll wake up, i'll wake up.
> >
> > If it's not a joke or just a 'declaration d'intention'
> > to be quickly forgotten later, it's a great success
> > not only for ASF or OSS, but for Java communi
On 3/22/02 14:55, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The real test for the "intent" will be to see JBoss getting their TCK to
> validate their product. Unfortunately this is implicitely excluded
> in the Sun response ( since it's an existing spec, not listed on their
> 'commit' lis
On 3/22/02 14:50, "Pier Fumagalli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm still not going to open a bottle of champagne, we need to see that LOI
> in action, but it's definitely good news...
I'm cautiously optimistic. The devil is in the details, but we've tried to
communicate clearly that our positio
umagalli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 4:51 PM
> To: Jakarta General List
> Subject: Re: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
>
>
> "GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'll wake up, i'll wa
off the press:
>
> --- Forwarded Message
> From: Harold Ogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation:
>
> The Apache Software Foundat
the next spec of J2EE will be.
Costin
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
>
> Hot off the press:
>
> --- Forwarded Message
> From: Harold Ogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
> To: [EMAIL PROT
"GOMEZ Henri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll wake up, i'll wake up.
>
> If it's not a joke or just a 'declaration d'intention'
> to be quickly forgotten later, it's a great success
> not only for ASF or OSS, but for Java community.
Folks... The kids you need to thank are here, and well-known
OTECTED]]
>Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 9:54 PM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
>
>
>This news is *huge*. We got what we wanted.
>
>Jason Hunter is the guy.
>
>-jon
>
>on 3/22/02 12:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This news is *huge*. We got what we wanted.
Of course it is huge:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/03/22/2059242&mode=thread&tid=108
Hm... *really* cool. I guess I am still skeptical though. I
I need to read it a few times...but it sounds good.
The devil will be in the details... "scholarship" is an interesting choice
of words regarding TCKs but I can see how they might want to be selective.
--- Begin Message ---
JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation:
JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation:
>
> The Apache Software Foundation published a position statement summarizing its
> concerns on the work in process to revise the JSPA.
Hot off the press:
--- Forwarded Message
From: Harold Ogle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JCP Program Chair responds to Apache Software Foundation:
The Apache Software Foundation published a po
24 matches
Mail list logo
