I'll try again:
1. As someone said, "community is more important than code"
2. I think the real problem here is not "code sharing" - the fact that
people are reticent to reuse code developed in other projects is just an
effect
3. I think the real problem is that each project has it's own
I'll try again:
1. As someone said, "community is more important than code"
2. I think the real problem here is not "code sharing" - the fact that
people are reticent to reuse code developed in other projects
is just an
effect
3. I think the real problem is that each project has
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about starting the "reuse" quest by reusing the jakarta-tools
repository ?
Wouldn't that break the "old" version of Watchdog ("jakarta-watchdog") that still
has dependencies here?
At any rate, the process questions need to be settled now (before any of us get
What about starting the "reuse" quest by reusing the jakarta-tools
repository ?
Wouldn't that break the "old" version of Watchdog ("jakarta-watchdog") that still
has dependencies here?
In what way ? By adding new directories and tools the old one shouldn't be
affected. Watchdog is using
With Java, it's led by Sun who, while far better
than most corporate entitites, is not about to lead a charge to
organize
the world of Free Java Resources.
Are you saying that your opinion of Jakarta is that it is lead by Sun?
Not at all, I'm saying the direction of the Java language
Not at all, I'm saying the direction of the Java language (note my
sentance
did not contain the word 'Jakarta') is lead by Sun, which I do not
believe
to be in error.
- jc
It wasn't a question of error.
It was simply a question to see if that was your impression at all.
:-)
Actually to
