Re: Jakarta POI audit.

2003-02-06 Thread Martin van den Bemt
In summary, there are no controversial licensing issues for the Jakarta POI project itself. The only area of question is whether Centipede's use of LGPL libraries and POI's use of Centipede as a build tool constitutes a problem. We are eager to resolve this in the event the board sees

Re: Jakarta POI audit.

2003-02-06 Thread acoliver
: Re: Jakarta POI audit. Martin van den Bemt wrote: In summary, there are no controversial licensing issues for the Jakarta POI project itself. The only area of question is whether Centipede's use of LGPL libraries and POI's use of Centipede as a build tool constitutes a problem. We

Jakarta POI audit.

2003-02-05 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPOIAudits/20030205 Although its not official, I'm more or less the defacto current member in charge of oversight for Jakarta POI. Because there seem to be questions on a number of projects as to their license usage, I thought it would be