In summary, there are no controversial licensing issues for the Jakarta
POI project itself. The only area of question is whether Centipede's
use of LGPL libraries and POI's use of Centipede as a build tool
constitutes a problem. We are eager to resolve this in the event the
board sees
: Re: Jakarta POI audit.
Martin van den Bemt wrote:
In summary, there are no controversial licensing issues for the Jakarta
POI project itself. The only area of question is whether Centipede's
use of LGPL libraries and POI's use of Centipede as a build tool
constitutes a problem. We
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?JakartaPOIAudits/20030205
Although its not official, I'm more or less the defacto current member
in charge of oversight for Jakarta POI.
Because there seem to be questions on a number of projects as to their
license usage, I thought it would be