Howdy, I'm reading the license information page (http://www.apache.org/licenses/proposed/) and I was glad to see the license can be included as a reference URI instead of the full text (section 8 on the above page). My questions are:
- Is there a preference/reason to pick the TXT over the HTML version? - http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 is OK for license 2.0. But it'd be nice if /licenses/LICENSE was symlinked to the current version, so that when ASF license 2.1 or 3.0 comes out we don't have to update all our source code. Is there such a symlink (the current /licenses/LICENSE is for 1.1)? - I've looked at the example NOTICE file (http://www.apache.org/licenses/example-NOTICE.txt). Since it's an HTTPD example, it has those paragraphs about NCSA, etc. If I'm writing the NOTICE file for a jakarta project that depends on other jakarta projects only, do I need to include them in the NOTICE file? Finally, is this the right place to ask/discuss this? Or do I need to subscribe to yet another mailing list, this time [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
