Re: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-29 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Noel, How can we find out whats already planned by Sun. For instance, I'm sure us Commons Math folks would all like to see the Nist/Java Grande rectangular matrices issue finalized and implemented. http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=083 But its difficult to see if this is stalled or dead at this

RE: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-29 Thread Noel J. Bergman
How can we find out whats already planned by Sun. I asked that exact question, and was told that they don't want to bias our input by telling us what is already on the plan. FWIW, I know that some of the things are already on some plans there. There is a big meeting on Monday to address

Re: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
http://wiki.apache.org/general/JavaFutures Stephen --- Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What wiki, where? Thanx, Jack On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:08:36 -0400, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, the ideas can be discussed on the mailing list, but we should collect

RE: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-28 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I can't quite see us managing this by tomorrow :-) Actually my concern is that we may add stuff to Java that harms rather than helps (Java isn't C or C++). So, my question remains whether we have any opportunity to vote against bad ideas. Anyway, its good to have some interaction with Sun ;-)

RE: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-27 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stephen Colebourne wrote: How are we deciding on the Java Futures? Are we voting? Just talking? Funny you should ask ... :-) First, the ideas can be discussed on the mailing list, but we should collect them on the Wiki. Second, we should try to prioritize them. Third, I have some feedback

Re: Deciding on Java futures?

2004-10-27 Thread Dakota Jack
What wiki, where? Thanx, Jack On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 20:08:36 -0400, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, the ideas can be discussed on the mailing list, but we should collect them on the Wiki. Second, we should try to prioritize them. Third, I have some feedback already on the