Andy writes:
[snip]
I think I'd be resistant to trying an Apache project that wasn't
committed to working on GUMP. Previous to GUMP most projects were known
Ok, now who's spreading the 'D' in FUDMaven can generate a basic gump
descriptor.
to be painfully tied to particular versions
How interesting, quite a few projects have managed to do it.
Obviously we are far less competent, intelligent, or dedicated then
those other projects. All things I am perfectly willing to accept as
long as you don't make me look at GUMP again.
more than it costs. Say I want to use Maven, but
Berin,
How does that match up with the NIH attitude towards Krysalis?
I wasn't aware of a Jakarta/XML project named cruise control.?
Hey, this is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion. For some strange
and perhaps slightly biased reason, I'm not too surprised
Steven Noels wrote:
Berin,
How does that match up with the NIH attitude towards Krysalis?
I wasn't aware of a Jakarta/XML project named cruise control.?
Hey, this is a [EMAIL PROTECTED] discussion. For some strange
and perhaps slightly biased reason,
Berin wrote:
Translation:
Jakarta = jakarta.apache.org
XML = xml.apache.org
And the reason on XML.apache.org there is no discussion is:
everyone seems to be on board with Forrest--which is using Centipede.
I wouldn't say so - while I would like the idea. But if this is the kind
of
Fine. The history is that Forrest was in motion before I even knew
there was such a thing as Maven. I know the folks involved with
Forrest, and they are top notch people. The whole purpose of Forrest
is to work with GUMP. (Notice the synergy: Forrest Gump).
Forrest was started and
On Thu, 2 May 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Berin Writes:
Forrest was started and talked about publicly on the general@xml
list before it was even started. That is something that somewhat
perturbs me about the Turbine projects. SOmething with Maven's
scope and ability should have
