RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-07-01 Thread Paulo Gaspar
. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 27 de Junho de 2003 17:48 To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses That is exactly what happens with this particular worm. If your address is in the address book of someone who gets

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-07-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but this got to such a dimension that I am sure all sysadmins must know how it works by now. Unlikely, this is by for not the first virus/worm working that way - during the last round I got informed that I was banned from the

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-07-01 Thread Tom Copeland
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Unlikely, this is by for not the first virus/worm working that way - during the last round I got informed that I was banned from the netbeans-dev list (that I had never subscribed to). I just got one from [EMAIL PROTECTED] That guy is a jerk!

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-07-01 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
for a while if you use Outlook and have this kind of doubt. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: sexta-feira, 27 de Junho de 2003 17:48 To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-07-01 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
On 7/1/03 8:20 AM, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Paulo Gaspar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: but this got to such a dimension that I am sure all sysadmins must know how it works by now. Unlikely, this is by for not the first virus/worm working that way - during

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:48:33 -0400 (EDT) (Subject: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses) Andrus Adamchik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [PROPOSAL] There maybe other exlanations

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Krishnan
krishnan mani -Original Message- From: BAZLEY, Sebastian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 3:59 PM To: 'Jakarta General List' Subject: RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses Would it be possible to mangle/remove the e-mail addresses

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Tetsuya Kitahata
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:29:23 +0100 (Subject: RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses) BAZLEY, Sebastian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to mangle/remove the e-mail addresses before publishing the postings? This would eventually fix the mirrors

RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread BAZLEY, Sebastian
-Original Message- From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 June 2003 12:20 To: Jakarta General List Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:29:23 +0100 (Subject: RE: Proposal: Jakarta should protect

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
Jakarta website has a very unfortunate and harmful feature - a full mbox archive at http://jakarta.apache.org/mail/ This is an invitation to spammers and people who spread viruses. And all those types are gladly taking advantage of it. Here is a few facts: -1. Open Source means

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. I'm getting that virus/attachment to every email address I have just about. I think it looks locally (user address book, etc). Thus I'm against this on the principal that its a big waste of time.

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrus Adamchik
I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. You gotta start somewhere. The fact that others are doing it wrong is not an excuse to do the wrong thing yourself (see your own argument about Outlook - you can't make everyone in the world to

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Craig (just cleaned out about 300 of these from this morning's mail) I feel your pain brother McClanahan, I feel your pain. I wish all of the dimwits who write the virus scanners would make it smart enough not to reply to the reply-to in the event of viruses which forge the reply-to...Duh.

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Santiago Gala
Andrew C. Oliver escribió: I'd be all of this if it would make a difference, unfortunately you're barking up the wrong tree. I'm getting that virus/attachment to every email address I have just about. I think it looks locally (user address book, etc). Thus I'm against this on the principal that

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
Unfortunately only someone who doesn't use Outlook can really sue M$. You see the license agreement says you hold them harmless. Now a non-party to the license agreement can obviously sue them (I think). -Andy On 6/27/03 1:58 PM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew C. Oliver

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread asudell
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:26:04 -0400 From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email

Re: Proposal: Jakarta should protect community email addresses

2003-06-27 Thread J.Pietschmann
asudell wrote: Might it perhaps make sense to scrub or obsucure email addresses from the author tags? There was an article on slashdot mentioning a study about how spammers get the addresses. Basically scraping web pages mailto links and strings looking like email addresses seems to be the most