From an outsider's perspective, you probably need a new proposal.
Un saludo,
Alex.
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 25 de abril de 2002 3:06
Para: Jakarta General List
Asunto: RE: RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb
So, I'm
So, I'm kind of curious what the general consensus is regarding this. Seems to be
in various directions.
I think JDBC should be a lot better; it should incorporate all the
features of CrossDB (though maybe a little different), and some more.
Then there should be higher-level tools like
Put [VOTE] in the subject tag and you'll get a definitive answer. (I'm
not sure you'll like it) Otherwise you'll get just discussion. Might
want to give http://jakarta.apache.org/site/newproject.html another
gander. Furthermore, you've gotten pretty definitive feedback from some
folks on here.
So, I'm kind of curious what the general consensus is regarding this. Seems to be in
various directions.
Travis
Original Message
From: Jeff Schnitzer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2002-04-24
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 22/04/2002 03:59:43 PM:
Actually Jon,
Torque and crossdb are quite a bit different. Torque is pre
generated and requires some preliminary setup and doesn't deal with
SQL statements directly. Whereas crossdb is on the fly and is an
object oriented way of
For dbs without an auto_inc feature, that db implementation would ignore this or
handle it accordingly. Up to that implementation.
Travis
Original Message
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2002-04-22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subproject
Thanks Leo, I couldn't have answered this better myself. ;-)
Travis
Original Message
From: Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2002-04-22
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Subproject Proposal - crossdb
I never said they were the same. I said that crossdb is a
I'm not sure what all the fuss is about here, but the fact of the matter is that if
you were to do a survey of developers using databases (SQL), my guess is that you
would find that the majority probably still use hard sql statements. A lot of people
don't see the need to use a high level
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jon, are you a bitter man? ;-)
This should answer your question:
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/jon.html
(yes, I know it was rhetorical)
regards,
michael
Travis
Original Message
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Well it's beyond a starting project and it works and people use it. For what it's
for, it works good.
Travis
Original Message
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2002-04-22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb
on 4/22/02
lol. nice.
Travis
Original Message
From: Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2002-04-22
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subproject Proposal - crossdb
on 4/22/02 4:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll buy that. I know that when I first
I think as a sub-project of Torque is probably a good idea taking into consideration
all the conversation in regards to this. On the one hand, you have the high level OR
concept which should be used, should being the important term here. But on the other
hand, a person should be able to use
Actually Jon,
Torque and crossdb are quite a bit different. Torque is pre generated and requires
some preliminary setup and doesn't deal with SQL statements directly. Whereas crossdb
is on the fly and is an object oriented way of creating SQL statements that are
database independent.
13 matches
Mail list logo
