RE: Using bzip2 for tarball

2001-11-19 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: > Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100 > From: Tim Vernum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Jakarta General List' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

RE: Using bzip2 for tarball

2001-11-19 Thread Tim Vernum
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along > > with gzip and zip format ? > You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bzip2 instead > of gzip. +1 on adding bzip2 -1 or removing gz

Re: Using bzip2 for tarball

2001-11-19 Thread Daniel Rall
GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along > with gzip and zip format ? > > It will save bytes and more important will fit better > with packaging recommandations of leading Linux distro. You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bz