RE: Review and testing of source code

2003-02-05 Thread Danny Angus
Its peer review, once the commiters themselves are happy to release the code (they vote to ascertain this) they release it. But as development is Open the code is actually available for download from CVS before it has been reviewed, approved, tested or anything. The golden rule is that code in

Re: Review and testing of source code

2003-02-05 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
This is probably something that I intended this for: http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?TheStudentResearchPage Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2003/2/4 4:17 PM, Eric Merhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Can you please send me or point me to information on how submitted open source

Review and testing of source code

2003-02-04 Thread Eric Merhoff
Hello, Can you please send me or point me to information on how submitted open source code is reviewed and tested by the organization before it is made available for download. My understanding is that this is managed through the Jakarta projec as SubProjects t but I couldn't find detailed on how

Re: Review and testing of source code

2003-02-04 Thread Jon Scott Stevens
on 2003/2/4 4:17 PM, Eric Merhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Can you please send me or point me to information on how submitted open source code is reviewed and tested by the organization before it is made available for download. My understanding is that this is managed through the

Re: Review and testing of source code

2003-02-04 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: on 2003/2/4 4:17 PM, Eric Merhoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Can you please send me or point me to information on how submitted open source code is reviewed and tested by the organization before it is made available for download. My