On Fri, 31 Jan 2003, Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
> Sorry! Just picking one point, but :)!
Slice it all apart, one point at a time :)
> > > > 7) What Apache community does Project X belong to?
> > > What's an Apache community? Do you mean 'top-level project'?
> >
> > Nope. Like, Jakarta should po
Hi!
Sorry! Just picking one point, but :)!
> > > 7) What Apache community does Project X belong to?
> > What's an Apache community? Do you mean 'top-level project'?
>
> Nope. Like, Jakarta should point to the Apache front page
> somewhere, Ant
> should too. BSF should point to Jakarta.
Agrreed
On Fri, 31 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/01/2003 02:28:59 PM:
>
> How about we give these items some names:
Sounds good.
> > 1) Where do I download?
> Downloads
> > 2) Has their been a release?
> Release Notes
Possibly this should be 'Status
Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 31/01/2003 02:28:59 PM:
[snip]
> However, a consistent skin might actually be the best way to get a
> consistently labelled and functional site together.
>
> Now I get to disagree with Dion :) His list of important things, the
ones
> Maven produce, are
[Welcome to session #7829 of the open source UN]
While I agree with Dion that the look and feel is secondary to content,
unification of labels is the most important thing. Users should expect a
project site to contain a certain set of content types, and a certain name
for each content type.
Actu
