On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
I would like to name the project Periodicity.
I would like to utilize the EJB architecture and support most of the
major EJB containers starting with JBoss of course.
I would like to
On 1/28/02 6:37 AM, Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
Can I base the iCalendar objects on EJB technologies?
You *can* but I suspect it will make your job of attracting a
Peter Donald wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002 07:38, Jeff Prickett wrote:
I would like to name the project Periodicity.
I would like to utilize the EJB architecture and support most of the
major EJB containers starting with JBoss of course.
I would like to use JUnit to write Unit
J2EE stuff has a different license than the JDK. I've been told
conflicting things about what you can distribute. Most of it sounds
bogus. I've read the license but you can read it a few different ways.
Basically I would think provided you do not extend the APIs (not meaning
the keyword
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
On Sun, 2002-01-27 at 23:17, Peter Donald wrote:
snip previous converstaion
+1, proper encapsulation should include EJB functionality for those who
desire it while not requiring it for those who do not. There is also a
matter of licensing involved there.
Thanks,
Hello Apache Software Foundation Community:
I have previously donated a large chunk of time to starting the
java-icalendar module which I had to stop maintaining about a year ago.
This was because of personal reasons. I would like to publicly apologize
to the ASF for not continuing the project.