Using bzip2 for tarball
Hi to all, What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along with gzip and zip format ? It will save bytes and more important will fit better with packaging recommandations of leading Linux distro. Thanks for your opinion ! - Henri Gomez ___[_] EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .) PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo... PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Using bzip2 for tarball
GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along with gzip and zip format ? It will save bytes and more important will fit better with packaging recommandations of leading Linux distro. You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bzip2 instead of gzip. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using bzip2 for tarball
From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along with gzip and zip format ? You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bzip2 instead of gzip. +1 on adding bzip2 -1 or removing gzip Many (most?) non-linux users don't have bzip2 binaries, and forcing people to download the (somewhat larger) .zip files would most likely result in a net increase in traffic. -- The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Using bzip2 for tarball
On Tue, 20 Nov 2001, Tim Vernum wrote: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 10:30:47 +1100 From: Tim Vernum [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Using bzip2 for tarball From: Daniel Rall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] GOMEZ Henri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about using the bzip2 format for tarball along with gzip and zip format ? You have my +1, though I would instead recommend using bzip2 instead of gzip. +1 on adding bzip2 -1 or removing gzip I'm +0 on bzip2, but also -1 on removing gzip. Many (most?) non-linux users don't have bzip2 binaries, and forcing people to download the (somewhat larger) .zip files would most likely result in a net increase in traffic. Beyond the size difference, zip files do not faithfully maintain Unix file and directory permissions, leading to all sorts of niggly problems such as unpacking things with executable shell scripts. Craig -- The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email in any way. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or attached files. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
