On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Chris Worley worl...@gmail.com wrote:
I couldn't get ramdisks working w/ SCST in RHEL5.2. When running:
echo open ramdisk /mnt/foo /proc/scsi_tgt/vdisk/vdisk
I get the error:
dev_vdisk: ***ERROR***: Wrong f_op or FS doesn't have required capabilities
...
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Chris Worley worl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Bart Van Assche
bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
Which Linux distro was installed on the inititiator and on the target
? And if applicable, which OFED version ? Which kernel messages were
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Chris Worley worl...@gmail.com wrote:
In lots of testing today, I've seen this panic twice on the Ubuntu 8.10
targets:
[ 330.155992] ib_srpt: disconnected session
0x0024714600247146 because a new SRP_LOGIN_REQ has
been received.
The above
This email was generated automatically, please do not reply
git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_5/linux-2.6.git
git_branch: ofed_kernel_1_5
Common build parameters:
Passed:
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.18
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.21.1
Passed on i686 with linux-2.6.19
Passed on
ConnectX can work more efficiently if the CPU cache line size is confiugred to
it at INIT_HCA. This patch configures cache line size for systems that report
it.
Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen e...@mellanox.co.il
---
drivers/net/mlx4/fw.c |7 +++
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Hello Roland,
I noticed that there are seven SRP patches (bug fixes) present in OFED
1.4.1 that are not present in mainstream Linux kernels up to and
including version 2.6.30. Do you know whether it is documented
anywhere which process is followed for merging such patches in the
mainstream Linux
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Bart Van Assche
bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed that there are six SRP patches (bug fixes) present in OFED
1.4.1 that are not present in mainstream Linux kernels up to and
including version 2.6.30. Do you know whether it is documented
anywhere which
Add ibcheckroutes script.
ibcheckroutes validates route between all leaf switches, switches or
CAs in the fabric.
Signed-off-by: Doron Shoham dor...@voltaire.com
---
infiniband-diags/Makefile.am |4 +-
infiniband-diags/configure.in |1 +
I noticed that there are seven SRP patches (bug fixes) present in OFED
1.4.1 that are not present in mainstream Linux kernels up to and
including version 2.6.30. Do you know whether it is documented
anywhere which process is followed for merging such patches in the
mainstream Linux
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Roland Dreier rdre...@cisco.com wrote:
I noticed that there are seven SRP patches (bug fixes) present in OFED
1.4.1 that are not present in mainstream Linux kernels up to and
including version 2.6.30. Do you know whether it is documented
anywhere which
Bart Van Assche wrote:
I would like to contact the author of the fourth patch. But unfortunately I
could not find any author information in that patch.
yes, non signed and unreviewed patches is a common practice of ofed,
does this create legal issues? maybe that would be the way to stop this?
I would like to contact the author of the fourth patch. But
unfortunately I could not find any author information in that patch.
Here is the info:
git log kernel_patches/fixes/srp_4_dev_loss_tmo.patch
commit c97ac3a3c509b6fd1fd511e44e81699c21704629
Author: Vu Pham vuhu...@mellanox.com
Date:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Bart Van Assche
bart.vanass...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:51 PM, Chris Worley worl...@gmail.com wrote:
In lots of testing today, I've seen this panic twice on the Ubuntu 8.10
targets:
[ 330.155992] ib_srpt: disconnected session
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Hal Rosenstock hal.rosenst...@gmail.comwrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Sasha Khapyorsky
sas...@voltaire.comwrote:
On 08:45 Mon 14 Sep , Hal Rosenstock wrote:
Does this mean consolidate_ipv6_snm_req does not work now ?
No, it doesn't. As
Hi Linus,
Sorry to hassle you about this, but I would like to know where things
stand. I know (from the reflink discussion if nothing else) that you're
definitely not bashful about telling people when their code sucks, so
this silent treatment has me really flustered. I've been showering and
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
Sorry to hassle you about this, but I would like to know where things
stand. I know (from the reflink discussion if nothing else) that you're
definitely not bashful about telling people when their code sucks, so
this silent treatment has me really
Call for Papers:
Special Issue of Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing on
Data Intensive Computing
---
Data intensive computing is posing many challenges in exploiting
parallelism of current and upcoming
Chris Worley, on 09/16/2009 12:51 AM wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin v...@vlnb.net wrote:
Chris Worley, on 09/15/2009 09:01 PM wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin v...@vlnb.net
wrote:
Chris Worley, on 09/15/2009 08:53 PM wrote:
On
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin v...@vlnb.net wrote:
Chris Worley, on 09/16/2009 12:51 AM wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin v...@vlnb.net
wrote:
Chris Worley, on 09/15/2009 09:01 PM wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Vladislav
19 matches
Mail list logo
