[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 0/9 Rev3] Implement batching skb API and support in IPoIB

2007-08-09 Thread Krishna Kumar2
David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/09/2007 09:57:27 AM: Patrick had suggested calling dev_hard_start_xmit() instead of conditionally calling the new API and to remove the new API entirely. The driver determines whether batching is required or not depending on (skb==NULL) or not.

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 3/4] rdma/cm: add ability to specify typeofservice

2007-08-09 Thread Or Gerlitz
Sean Hefty wrote: I was leaning towards always including the SID with the PR query, but I want to understand the consequences of doing so. The result is that it gives all of the policy to the SA. Does anyone disagree with this approach? I think its fine to let the SA do all the policy

[ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED 1.2.c-11 is available

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Michael, OFED 1.2 is based on 2.6.21 and OFED 1.2.1 on 2.6.22, did you do some 1.2 wrap up of returning fixes to the upstream code? from the length of the patch list (specifically, the amount of ipoib and mthca ones) it does not seem so, please correct me if I am wrong. In 1.2.c most

[ofa-general] ofa_1_2_kernel 20070809-0100 daily build status

2007-08-09 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
This email was generated automatically, please do not reply git_url: git://git.openfabrics.org/ofed_1_2/linux-2.6.git git_branch: ofed_1_2 Common build parameters: --with-ipoib-mod --with-sdp-mod --with-srp-mod --with-user_mad-mod --with-user_access-mod --with-mthca-mod --with-core-mod

[ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED 1.2.c-11 is available

2007-08-09 Thread Or Gerlitz
Tziporet Koren wrote: The patches that does not include sign-off and explanation were posted by Eli, and he forgot this by mistake - to be fixed. All the changes are going to be send for the list for review next week. thanks for the clarification, however, I don't see a reason not to post a

[ofa-general] ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070809-0200 daily build status

2007-08-09 Thread Vladimir Sokolovsky
/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070809-0200_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:831: error: invalid type argument of ‘-’ /home/vlad/tmp/ofa_1_2_c_kernel-20070809-0200_linux-2.6.19_powerpc_check/drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_main.c:834: error: invalid type argument of ‘-’ /home

[ofa-general] [PATCH] IB/ehca: Properly report max #SRQs in query_device()

2007-08-09 Thread Joachim Fenkes
Signed-off-by: Joachim Fenkes [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This patch should apply cleanly on top of Stefan's recent patchset. Please review and apply for 2.6.23. Thanks. drivers/infiniband/hw/ehca/ehca_hca.c | 10 +++--- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

[ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED 1.2.c-11 is available

2007-08-09 Thread Or Gerlitz
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: In 1.2.c most patches are backported from 2.6.23. Some have been submitted for 2.6.24. Some have been carried from 1.2. I see mistakes in the process here: for example patches that solve IB bugs in 2.6.22 should have been submitted to -stable and this ofed version

[ofa-general] mvapich2 mpd vs smpd

2007-08-09 Thread Louwrens Boonstra
Hi, For SGE tight integration we need the use of smpd rather than mpd. Is it possible to have this as an ofed.conf configuration option? For instance: MVAPICH2_CONF_mp=smpd I don't mind unpacking the tar from the SRPM and patching the make.mvapich.* files once in a while but it would save us

[ofa-general] Re: RFCv2: SRC API

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Tang, Changqing [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: RE: RFCv2: SRC API I have another question, when using SRQ, or SRC+SRQ, when a completion is returned by ibv_poll_cq(), is there an easy way to find who sent this message to me ? 'struct ibv_wc' does not say much about

[ofa-general] Re: problems with ofed-1.2.c chelsio low level driver

2007-08-09 Thread Steve Wise
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: problems with ofed-1.2.c chelsio low level driver Michael, I've discovered that I was really testing the ofed-1.2 cxgb3.ko module in my testing 1.2.c regression test. Upon getting a complete 1.2.c installed, I'm

[ofa-general] are you planning to add support for valgrind in librdmacm and libibcm?

2007-08-09 Thread Dotan Barak
Hi Sean. Valgrind is a great tool which helps many developers finds bugs in their code (and sometimes the bugs are found in the used libraries). Do you plan to add support for valgrind in librdmacm and libibcm? thanks Dotan ___ general mailing list

[ofa-general] Re: [ewg] OFED 1.2.c status plans

2007-08-09 Thread Tziporet Koren
Steve Wise wrote: Tziporet, Can we make the change to 1.2.5? This should probably include: - change builds/connectx to builds/ofed-1.2.5 (or just add a link) - change build names from 1.2.c to 1.2.5 I think we will go for this Tziporet ___

[ofa-general] Virtual interface over bonding interface?

2007-08-09 Thread Peter Selzner
Hi, is it passible to create a virtual interface over a bonding interface? We have created two bonding interfaces in this way: cat /etc/infiniband/openib.conf .# Enable the bonding driver on startup IPOIBBOND_ENABLE=yes # Set bond interface names IPOIB_BONDS=ibbond0,ibbond1 # Set specific bond

[ofa-general] Re: problems with ofed-1.2.c chelsio low level driver

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: problems with ofed-1.2.c chelsio low level driver Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting Steve Wise [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: problems with ofed-1.2.c chelsio low level driver Michael, I've discovered that I was really testing the

[ofa-general] OFED 1.2.5 (was 1.2.c) plans

2007-08-09 Thread Tziporet Koren
Hi All, We wish to have the final build with latest fixes next Monday This means ALL changes must be ready till end of Sunday (for US end of the week). Release target date is Wed 15-Aug Steav Hoang-Nam - please send me RN for your drivers (the file itself, or a patch against my git tree:

[ofa-general] IPoIB High Availability

2007-08-09 Thread Amar Mudrankit
This is a query regarding IPoIB HA behaviour. If I physically pull of the cable from IB port corresponding to primary IPoIB interface, I notice that the configuration of primary IPoIB interface is migrated to the secondary IPoIB interface. But, if the primary interface is made down just by

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ

2007-08-09 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
Roland, Michael, Could you please review this patch and provide your comments? I would like to finish up this work at the soonest and have this integrated into the for-2.6.24 tree. Pradeep ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Pradeep Satyanarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ Roland, Michael, Could you please review this patch and provide your comments? I would like to finish up this work at the soonest and have this

[ofa-general] Re: are you planning to add support for valgrind in librdmacm and libibcm?

2007-08-09 Thread Sean Hefty
Do you plan to add support for valgrind in librdmacm and libibcm? I have no objections to it being added, but have no plans to add it myself at this time. - Sean ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org

[ofa-general] IEEE Hot Interconnect: Final Call for Advanced Registration

2007-08-09 Thread Weikuan Yu
Please join us for Hot Interconnects: The 15th annual three-day Symposium at Stanford University. IEEE Hot Interconnects brings together computer architects and chip designers to discuss hardware and software issues for next-generation network systems. Universities and companies discuss the

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Roland Dreier
+++ b/SRC.txt @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +Here's some documentation on Scalable Reliable Connections. I think this would be more useful in the man page for ibv_open_src_domain() (which needs to be written ;). You know, reading over the patch, it strikes me that src is a very confusing acronym,

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] libibverbs: Initialize reserved attributes in modify QP command

2007-08-09 Thread Roland Dreier
Roland: do you prefer that every fix will be posted in a separate patch (with the warning it fixes) or one patch for all of the fixes i have? Either way is fine I guess. - R. ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation +++ b/SRC.txt @@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +Here's some documentation on Scalable Reliable Connections. I think this would be more useful in the man page for

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Sean Hefty
You know, reading over the patch, it strikes me that src is a very confusing acronym, since it really looks like an abbreviation for source. I don't know what would be better off the top of my head but ideas would be appreciated. No idea. How about something along the lines of connection

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Roland Dreier
I actually took pains to avoid breaking the ABI, so I think we won't need to change the version and/or create compat wrappers. No? It doesn't seem so to me -- for example @@ -408,6 +415,7 @@ struct ibv_qp_init_attr { struct ibv_qp_cap cap; enum ibv_qp_type

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Roland Dreier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation I actually took pains to avoid breaking the ABI, so I think we won't need to change the version and/or create compat wrappers. No? It doesn't seem so to me -- for

[ofa-general] [RFC] the never ending search for SA scalability

2007-08-09 Thread Sean Hefty
I'd like to propose the following change as a simple solution for handling SA scalability problems: Modify the ib_sa module to support an SA LID that's separate from the SM LID. This concept is supported by the spec through SA redirection; however, I propose that we also allow the SA LID to be

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space.

2007-08-09 Thread Steve Wise
Any more comments? Steve Wise wrote: Networking experts, I'd like input on the patch below, and help in solving this bug properly. iWARP devices that support both native stack TCP and iWARP (aka RDMA over TCP/IP/Ethernet) connections on the same interface need the fix below or some

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API and documentation

2007-08-09 Thread Michael S. Tsirkin
Quoting Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCHv4 RFC] Scalable Reliable Connection: API?and documentation You know, reading over the patch, it strikes me that src is a very confusing acronym, since it really looks like an abbreviation for source. I don't know

[ofa-general] ConnectX Support

2007-08-09 Thread John Leidel
All... a few questions on connectx support in OFED. I'm currently trying to benchmark a machine with connectx HCAs. What version of OFED properly supports connectx. Has anyone done any testing regarding which MPI distro performs best [or at all] on connectx gear? thanks in advance --john

[ofa-general] [PATCH] ib_umad unaligned access on ia64

2007-08-09 Thread akepner
We get lots of kernel unaligned access warnings from this one on ia64. user_mad.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) Signed-off-by: Arthur Kepner [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- --- ofa_kernel-1.2.orig/drivers/infiniband/core/user_mad.c 2007-06-21 07:38:47.0 -0700

RE: [ofa-general] ConnectX Support

2007-08-09 Thread Scott Weitzenkamp (sweitzen)
OFED 1.2.c supports ConnectX (OFED 1.2 does not). Cisco is testing Open MPI, MVAPICH, MVAPICH2, Intel MPI, and HP MPI successfully with ConnectX. Scott Weitzenkamp SQA and Release Manager Server Virtualization Business Unit Cisco Systems -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] ib_umad unaligned access on ia64

2007-08-09 Thread Roland Dreier
I thought we already dealt with this one in commit fa7252ed? ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general To unsubscribe, please visit

Re: [ofa-general] IPoIB High Availability

2007-08-09 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 8/9/07, Amar Mudrankit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a query regarding IPoIB HA behaviour. Its unclear from your question if you use the IPoIB HA daemon or the IPoIB bonding. The first one is not going to be supported in OFED 1.3 and at least two companies (Cisco and Voltaire) has

Re: [ofa-general] Virtual interface over bonding interface?

2007-08-09 Thread Or Gerlitz
On 8/9/07, Peter Selzner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it passible to create a virtual interface over a bonding interface? what is a virtual interface? do you mean to an alias? We have created two bonding interfaces in this way: cat /etc/infiniband/openib.conf ibbond0_IP=10.252.10.21

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space.

2007-08-09 Thread Sean Hefty
Steve Wise wrote: Any more comments? Does anyone have ideas on how to reserve the port space without using a struct socket? - Sean ___ general mailing list general@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space.

2007-08-09 Thread David Miller
From: Sean Hefty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:40:16 -0700 Steve Wise wrote: Any more comments? Does anyone have ideas on how to reserve the port space without using a struct socket? How about we just remove the RDMA stack altogether? I am not at all kidding. If you guys

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space.

2007-08-09 Thread Sean Hefty
How about we just remove the RDMA stack altogether? I am not at all kidding. If you guys can't stay in your sand box and need to cause problems for the normal network stack, it's unacceptable. We were told all along the if RDMA went into the tree none of this kind of stuff would be an issue.

[ofa-general] Re: ofa_1_2_c_kernel 20070802-0201 daily build status

2007-08-09 Thread Doug Ledford
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 15:30 +0200, Hoang-Nam Nguyen wrote: Hello Doug and Scott! On Thursday 02 August 2007 18:08, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: ehca backports for kernel.org kernels seem to be broken. 1. Does anyone care enough to fix them? If not we'll disable ehca in build for these

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] ib_umad unaligned access on ia64

2007-08-09 Thread akepner
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:54:31PM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote: I thought we already dealt with this one in commit fa7252ed? I didn't see anything which obviously addresses this in any tree I found at kernel.org or openfabrics.org, but maybe I didn't look in the right tree. -- Arthur

[ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] infiniband-diags: Add ibcli program and man page

2007-08-09 Thread Ira Weiny
Hey Sasha, Dave, See below... On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 00:42:39 +0300 Sasha Khapyorsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On 09:41 Wed 01 Aug , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add ibcli program and man page to infiniband-diags. [snip...] +.SH SYNOPSIS +.B ibcli +get [archive]

[ofa-general] [PATCH 2/2] infiniband-diags/set_mthca_nodedesc.sh: change to work for all HCA's

2007-08-09 Thread Ira Weiny
From 3c78f9f7797a9029b33a1a80476f82929f8a7ad7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ira K. Weiny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 18:51:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Change the name of set_mthca_nodedesc.sh to set_nodedesc.sh because it should work for all HCA types now. Signed-off-by: Ira K. Weiny

[ofa-general] [PATCH 1/2] infiniband-diags/set_mthca_nodedesc.sh: change to work for all HCA's

2007-08-09 Thread Ira Weiny
From 3abf9ac10ee90f7272969486704c2989d254a2ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ira K. Weiny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:07:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Modify set_mthca_nodedesc to set the node_desc for any hca type found in sysfs. This has been tested for the MLX4 and mthca cards but

[ofa-general] [PATCH 0/2] infiniband-diags/set_mthca_nodedesc.sh: change to work for all HCA's

2007-08-09 Thread Ira Weiny
I have changed set_mthca_nodedesc.sh to look for all HCA's in sysfs and set the nodedesc to the host name. I have tested it on MLX4 and mthca cards and it works fine. I don't know if other dirvers allow writes to their nodedesc sysfs entry. If they do this should work for all cards.

Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH] ib_umad unaligned access on ia64

2007-08-09 Thread Roland Dreier
I thought we already dealt with this one in commit fa7252ed? I didn't see anything which obviously addresses this in any tree I found at kernel.org or openfabrics.org, but maybe I didn't look in the right tree. this is the commit I'm talking about; I think it went into 2.6.21 but

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/2] infiniband-diags/set_mthca_nodedesc.sh: change to work for all HCA's

2007-08-09 Thread Hal Rosenstock
On 8/9/07, Ira Weiny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From 3abf9ac10ee90f7272969486704c2989d254a2ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ira K. Weiny [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 16:07:38 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Modify set_mthca_nodedesc to set the node_desc for any hca type found in sysfs.

[ofa-general] nightly osm_sim report 2007-08-10:normal completion

2007-08-09 Thread kliteyn
OSM Simulation Regression Summary [Generated mail - please do NOT reply] OpenSM rev = Wed_Aug_8_22:48:15_2007 [83d1f5ea339704f30e26918a897f9ead5a10678e] ibutils rev = Tue_Mar_13_14:36:32_2007 [80aaff94f0eb65117db39b9db7d609ffdcc055de] Total=520 Pass=461 Fail=59 Pass: 39 LidMgr

Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ

2007-08-09 Thread Pradeep Satyanarayana
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: Quoting Pradeep Satyanarayana [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Subject: Re: [ofa-general] [PATCH][RFC] Handle packet received on RQ of tx_qp with NOSRQ Roland, Michael, Could you please review this patch and provide your comments? I would like to finish up this work at the