+1
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Alin Dreghiciu wrote:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Pieber
> wrote:
> > Since there is one +1 and no other votes I'll do this together with the
> next
> > release of the next project. Paxrunner, Paxexam or Paxuseradmin might be
> > good ca
if (there is negative impact on Javadoc builds) {
-1; // see next message, to keep threads clean
}
else {
+1;
}
Am 17.08.2011 16:30, schrieb Alin Dreghiciu:
+1
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
Since there is one +1 and no other votes I'll do this together with t
+1
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Andreas Pieber wrote:
> Since there is one +1 and no other votes I'll do this together with the next
> release of the next project. Paxrunner, Paxexam or Paxuseradmin might be
> good candidates? :-)
> Kind regards,
> Andreas
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 19:11, A
Since there is one +1 and no other votes I'll do this together with the next
release of the next project. Paxrunner, Paxexam or Paxuseradmin might be
good candidates? :-)
Kind regards,
Andreas
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 19:11, Achim Nierbeck wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> here is my +1 for this :-)
>
> re
Hi Andreas,
here is my +1 for this :-)
regards, Achim
2011/8/9, Andreas Pieber :
> Hey guys,
>
> As you've might have noticed i've moved the ops4j and pax parent to github.
> Since most of the pain of the releases originate from the failing site
> deployment and almost no ops4j project any longe
Hey guys,
As you've might have noticed i've moved the ops4j and pax parent to github.
Since most of the pain of the releases originate from the failing site
deployment and almost no ops4j project any longer use maven cite I would
like to remove the site goal from the root plugin. If it is really r
