Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)

2009-11-24 Thread Andi Vajda
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote: I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by Shai Erera, who wanted to make "bad" things with addAttribute, breaking its behaviour, LUCENE-2088) and an im

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)

2009-11-24 Thread Uwe Schindler
> As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now > just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. > I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are > otherwise identical, in the same cache. DM Smith also wanted this in 2.9.2, which I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)

2009-11-24 Thread Michael McCandless
As DM Smith said, since the bug is longstanding and we are only now just hearing about it, it appears not to be that severe in practice. I guess users don't often mix coord enabled & disabled BQs, that are otherwise identical, in the same cache. So I think we ship 3.0.0 anyways? Mike On Tue, Nov