t; eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Helmut Jarausch [mailto:jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:33 AM
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org
>> Cc: Andi Vajda
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apac
om: Helmut Jarausch [mailto:jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:33 AM
To: general@lucene.apache.org
Cc: Andi Vajda
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
On 24 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote:
I built PyLucene trunk using Lucene Java source from the
arti
gt; To: java-...@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: general@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>
> +1. I downloaded the artifacts, tried the demo, verified signatures,
> MD5s, etc.
>
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> >
+1. I downloaded the artifacts, tried the demo, verified signatures, MD5s, etc.
On Nov 22, 2009, at 10:07 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
> 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by Shai
> E
9 4:07 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
> 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the Token
That failure can be ignored.
The test is old (was in the 1st rev of the book, but I've removed it
in the 2nd edition) -- it's asserting that building a tiny index using
compound file is faster than building one with multi file, which in
general is true, but for a tiny index the difference can be i
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>
> On 24 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote:
> > I built PyLucene trunk using Lucene Java source from the artifact's svn
> rev
> > and all unit tests and ported "Lucene in Action" tests pass.
> >
> > +1
On 24 Nov, Andi Vajda wrote:
> I built PyLucene trunk using Lucene Java source from the artifact's svn rev
> and all unit tests and ported "Lucene in Action" tests pass.
>
> +1 !
>
> Andi..
Many thanks, Andi.
Here (AMD64, python-2.6.4) a single test fails
java development with ant: 0.502968132
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Uwe Schindler wrote:
I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by Shai
Erera, who wanted to make "bad" things with addAttribute, breaking its
behaviour, LUCENE-2088) and an im
13 Bremen
> > http://www.thetaphi.de
> > eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> >> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM
> >> To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-..
Original Message-
>> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
>> Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM
>> To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-...@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I h
he.org; java-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
> 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by
> Shai
&g
ics). :-)
>
> And I forgot:
> I was able to build and test the whole distribution from the source ZIP.
> JavaDocs of binary distrib were ok, too.
>
> So no change: +1 :-)
>
> Uwe
>
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u..
, too.
So no change: +1 :-)
Uwe
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 22, 2009 4:07 PM
> > To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-...@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Ja
2009 4:07 PM
> To: general@lucene.apache.org; java-...@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene Java 3.0.0 (take #2)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
> 3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the
Hi,
I have built the artifacts for the final release of "Apache Lucene Java
3.0.0" a second time, because of a bug in the TokenStream API (found by Shai
Erera, who wanted to make "bad" things with addAttribute, breaking its
behaviour, LUCENE-2088) and an improvement in NumericRangeQuery (to preven
16 matches
Mail list logo
