> -Original Message-
> From: Peter B. West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> A personal opinion only, but I think JuiCE is an excellent name. Think
> of names like Jetty, Tomcat, Jakarta, and compare them with OpenSSL. I
FWIW:
Me too. A JuiCEd-up JCE? Has a very nice ring to it.
Cheers,
Kumar, Pankaj wrote:
Why not call it "OpenJCE" -- Half the name for OpenSSL and another half for JCE. Another alternative would be ApacheJCE.
Berin,
A personal opinion only, but I think JuiCE is an excellent name. Think
of names like Jetty, Tomcat, Jakarta, and compare them with OpenSSL. I
thi
Kumar, Pankaj wrote:
BTW, is the proposal to develop a (i) JCE provider (like BouncyCastle); or (ii) a JCE engine (not much value); or (iii) both (like Cryptix)?
In the first instance a provider, as the main aim is simply to provide
access to OpenSSLs crypto routines.
Cheers,
Berin
-
r of "J2EE Security for Servlets, EJBs and Web Services" (
http://www.j2ee-security.net )
-Original Message-
From: Berin Lautenbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2004 3:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Native JCE
Well it might make sense
Well it might make sense if I'd said "Step on the..." - as in step on
the gas/accelerator in a car (rather than "stop on the".) It's also a
okay on JCE - JuiCE.
And I dunno - I've been playing with crypto for a while. I've never
understood the complete lack of levity :>.
But, as I said, it's
--- Berin Lautenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> (BTW - We are still working through a name, but it's
> looking like
> "Juice" - as in "stop on the...".)
>
I don't get it, but regardless, I think it will be
more difficult for people to take a cryptography-based
product with that name seriou
