On 14/04/2012 15:45, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Fop and XMLGraphicsCommons appear to be two of the few Apache products
still using Bugzilla instead of JIRA. I propose we migrate to JIRA. Any
objection?
You said most of the work would be done on infra@. But I'm guessing that
someone from
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
On 14/04/2012 15:45, Glenn Adams wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Fop and XMLGraphicsCommons appear to be two of the few Apache products
still using Bugzilla instead of JIRA. I propose we migrate to JIRA. Any
objection?
On 16/04/2012 10:46, Glenn Adams wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.comwrote:
You said most of the work would be done on infra@. But I'm guessing that
someone from the XML Graphics PMC would need to help in some way, or is it
as simple as opening a
Hi Glenn,
Apart from the linking between bugs and svn commits, what do we gain?
Migrating to JIRA is presumably non-trivial[1], so is it really worth it?
I did suggest this after using JIRA with PDFBox because it's nicer to use
and faster, but I'm not sure those reasons mitigate the cost of
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:17 AM, mehdi houshmand med1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Glenn,
Apart from the linking between bugs and svn commits, what do we gain?
Migrating to JIRA is presumably non-trivial[1], so is it really worth it?
I did suggest this after using JIRA with PDFBox because it's
here's a nice view of an improved interface, showing a summary of activity
on the INFRA project; it would take a fair a bit of work to extract the
same information from BZ
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com wrote:
I notice
