+1
Vincent
On 26/08/14 16:24, Simon Steiner wrote:
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us
to control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has
plugins, we can trigger manually and make changes without asking infra for
help (if
-commons/
https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
Thanks
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor
://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-commons/
https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
Thanks
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can
@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
I think this will be a positive move.
Looking at the output at
https://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/16/console I see at the end:
findbugs-exec:
[findbugs] Executing findbugs FindBugsTask from ant task
[findbugs] Running
://builds.apache.org/job/xmlgraphics-fop/
Thanks
From: Glenn Adams [mailto:gl...@skynav.com]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor of builds
working
+1
Looks good. As I imagine quite a few of us have already used Jenkins, I think
this is only a good thing.
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:52:54 +0200
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
From: psancho@gmail.com
To: general@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Hi,
+1, I like the idea.
2014-08-27 10
+1 from me... Sorry to see GUMP go though! Run Forrest! Run! ;-)
On Aug 26, 2014, at 8:24 AM, Simon Steiner simonsteiner1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us to
control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has
]
Sent: 26 August 2014 16:33
To: XML Graphics Project
Cc: FOP Developers
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Move to Jenkins
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor of builds
working first, then we can evaluate the results prior to doing a vote (and
switchover)?
On Tue, Aug 26
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for Fop, XGC, Pdf-plugin. This allows us
to control version of checkstyle, also Jenkins is more flexible, has
plugins, we can trigger manually and make changes without asking infra for
help (if workspace is corrupted we can fix it ourselves).
Fop job:
assuming this will pass if it works, can you get the jenkins flavor of
builds working first, then we can evaluate the results prior to doing a
vote (and switchover)?
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Simon Steiner simonsteiner1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
Vote to move from Gump to Jenkins for
10 matches
Mail list logo