On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 9:57 AM chris burke wrote:
> I agree it makes sense to support more hosting repos. The relevant
> pacman code is under https://github.com/jsoftware/base9, in particular
> see gitrepo.ijs.
>
> Perhaps the info in the proposed ~user/config/user-addons.txt would be
> better
I agree it makes sense to support more hosting repos. The relevant
pacman code is under https://github.com/jsoftware/base9, in particular
see gitrepo.ijs.
Perhaps the info in the proposed ~user/config/user-addons.txt would be
better in ~addons/config, either as a new file or extra info in
On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 1:22 AM 'Viktor Grigorov' via General
wrote:
> There's bitbucket.org, codeberg.org, gitlab.com, sr.ht, gitea.io, among
> others. (They don't also arguably illegaly feed your code to their commercial
> products.) There can't not exist some way to test whether or not a URI
There's bitbucket.org, codeberg.org, gitlab.com, sr.ht, gitea.io, among others.
(They don't also arguably illegaly feed your code to their commercial
products.) There can't not exist some way to test whether or not a URI points
to a repository. Most, if not all use have a suffix of
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:17 PM 'Viktor Grigorov' via General
wrote:
> github is a monopoly, but not the sole code hosting website. Allowing for any
> remote or local repository would be more prudent.
Sure... hmm...
Currently, github is the only repo supported by pacman.
Perhaps it would be
github is a monopoly, but not the sole code hosting website. Allowing for any
remote or local repository would be more prudent.
Package updating would be nice IF doing the install doen't overwrite file (and
clear dir beforehand).
Aug 26, 2022, 04:03 by rauldmil...@gmail.com:
> Currently, we
