Thanks!
On 08.01.2009 12:51:51 Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2009-01-08, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > Hmm, I wonder why Gump thinks commons-logging and commons-io are
> > "unknown to *this* workspace". I can see those two just fine.
>
> A change to commons-proper's Gump descriptor made it non-well
On 2009-01-08, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hmm, I wonder why Gump thinks commons-logging and commons-io are
> "unknown to *this* workspace". I can see those two just fine.
A change to commons-proper's Gump descriptor made it non-well-formed
so Gump dropped the whole of commons, including commons-lo
