Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-01 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr.
On May 30, 2005, at 9:45 PM, Eddie O'Neil wrote: Comments in-line... Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On May 29, 2005, at 8:21 AM, Eddie ONeil wrote: But, I do think that we should complete the current milestone release in order to get something new out there. +1 If you are calling this a

RE: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release

2005-06-01 Thread Song Wang
-Original Message- From: Ken Tam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 2:09 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org; Beehive Developers Subject: RE: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release +1 > -Original Message- > From: Eddie O'Neil > Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 1

Re: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse

2005-06-01 Thread Davanum Srinivas
Dear PMC members, please [VOTE] :) In case you want to peek at the latest status files...they are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/apollo.html http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/

Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2

2005-06-01 Thread Richard Feit
+1 ! Eddie O'Neil wrote: Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1". :) Eddie Eddie ONeil wrote: All-- Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that are now posted here: http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Heidi Buelow wrote: > > Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library > > Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @ RogueWave > dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com) > > (0) rationale > > The goal of the Apache C++ St

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread Martin Sebor
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ... There's at least one open implementation out there now: the GNU STL. What differentiates the RW codebase from the GNU one? If there are bugs or performance, uh, deficiencies in the GNU one, why not submit the changes to the

RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2

2005-06-01 Thread Ken Tam
+1 -Original Message- From: Richard Feit Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 11:20 AM To: Beehive Developers Cc: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2 +1 ! Eddie O'Neil wrote: > > Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1". > > >

RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2

2005-06-01 Thread James Song
+1 -James -Original Message- From: Eddie O'Neil Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 5:21 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: Beehive Developers Subject: Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2 Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1". :) Eddie Eddie ONeil w

Re: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse

2005-06-01 Thread Roy T. Fielding
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/ site-publish/projects/apollo.html +1 to graduate. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/ site-publish/projects/hermes.html +1 to graduate. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubato

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 03:43 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote: >GNU libstdc++ is a fine implementation of the standard but its >big limitation is its dependency on gcc. What differentiates >our implementation is its portability to all the other compilers >besides gcc, which on most platforms other than Linux is still

Re: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse

2005-06-01 Thread David Crossley
Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Dear PMC members, > > please [VOTE] :) > > In case you want to peek at the latest status files...they are here: > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/apollo.html > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubat

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread Martin Sebor
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: At 03:43 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote: GNU libstdc++ is a fine implementation of the standard but its big limitation is its dependency on gcc. What differentiates our implementation is its portability to all the other compilers besides gcc, which on most platform

Re: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse

2005-06-01 Thread Ian Springer
David Crossley wrote: Davanum Srinivas wrote: Dear PMC members, please [VOTE] :) In case you want to peek at the latest status files...they are here: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/apollo.html http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*chec

RE: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Technical issues having been commented on ... > in light of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-05/msg00134.html > and its complete thread. The claims that the ASF has an NIH issue are contradicted by the existance of the Incubator. These aren't projects invented

RE: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse

2005-06-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Roy T. Fielding wrote: > would prefer that webservices behave more like a > single project than an umbrella. +1 --- Noel - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

updating websites (Was: [VOTE] Apollo, Hermes, Muse)

2005-06-01 Thread David Crossley
Ian Springer wrote: > David Crossley wrote: > >Davanum Srinivas wrote: > > > >>Dear PMC members, > >> > >>please [VOTE] :) > >> > >>In case you want to peek at the latest status files...they are here: > >>http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/public/trunk/site-publish/projects/apo

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 06:45 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote: >William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> >>Can you give us a sense of the 'currently' supported platforms >>and compilers? > >The C++ Standard Library project has been ported to the following >compilers and operating systems:[...] That said, I'm suitably impressed

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > I'm willing to serve as either mentor or ppmc member, as you will. > +1 to STDCXX -entering- incubation. Glad to hear it. You can help me and Ben help them. =) It's been pointed out that mentors should be on the Incubator P

RE: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Eddie O'Neil wrote: > I've heard a couple of times that it's not possible to do a -final > release from the Incubator, but I've also heard some suggest that > it could be possible. It should not be done, by definition of being in the Incubator. > Didn't Derby do one of these in December 2004 as

[STATUS] (incubator) Wed Jun 1 23:47:00 2005

2005-06-01 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
APACHE INCUBATOR PROJECT STATUS: -*-indented-text-*- Last modified at [$Date: 2005-01-20 01:12:13 -0500 (Thu, 20 Jan 2005) $] Web site: http://Incubator.Apache.Org/ Wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ [note: the Web site is the 'official' documentation; the wiki

RE: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release

2005-06-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Eddie ONeil wrote: > > - incubation notice in the directories > by this do you mean to add the incubation notice to the > download directories like this one? > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/20050526 Yes. We used to have that there, although I'm noticing that projects have gotten

Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-06-01 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 10:10 PM 6/1/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: >On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >> I'm willing to serve as either mentor or ppmc member, as you will. >> +1 to STDCXX -entering- incubation. > >Glad to hear it. You can help me and Ben help them. =) > >It's been

Re: [vote] beehive v1 milestone 1 release

2005-06-01 Thread Eddie ONeil
Great; I'll see if I've got the right permissions to add the notice to dist/incubator and will add the appropriate link for our subsequent nightlies and releases. Probably worth clarifying when those links should be created (nightlies, releases, etc). Thanks for the update. Eddie On

Re: releasing from incubator? -- was: Re: a beehive release and the JSR 181 TCK issue

2005-06-01 Thread Eddie ONeil
CIL... > > If I'm messing up terminology > > Oh, the terminology got messed up long ago. LOL :-) Even the term > "Release" has different connotations. It is neutral in the HTTP Server > project (beta and GA releases, for example), whereas Jakarta refers to > Nightly builds, Milestone builds