Hi Bertrand, hi Giuanugo,
we discussed that with Florent Guillaume (from Chemistry) already.
There are two aspects here, let me start with the technical one:
As stated in the proposal: Chemistry aims to have a broader scope (including
server implementations and mappings to JCR). OpenCMIS is
Paul, thanks for your reply. Some quick comments:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote:
Hi Bertrand, hi Giuanugo,
we discussed that with Florent Guillaume (from Chemistry) already.
There are two aspects here, let me start with the technical one:
As stated in
Hi Paul,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote:
...we discussed that with Florent Guillaume (from Chemistry) already
Ok - although Florent is AFAIK very much involved in Chemistry, in my
Apache book that doesn't count as discussing with the Chemistry
project.
Hi,
Gianugo Rabellino schrieb:
... snip ...
I wish this discussion happened on chemistry-dev, and I would actually
like to see what the community as a whole thinks about it. I'd
actually prefer to see OpenCMIS possibly spinning off from Chemistry
after an unsuccessful integration attempt
Hi,
I can talk a bit about the OpenCMIS architecture. That might help to
distinguish it from Chemistry.
OpenCMIS consists of two layers. We call them Provider layer and Client layer.
The Provider layer implements and hides the CMIS bindings. The API of the
Provider layer maps the CMIS domain
Hi,
well, sorry that the discussion did not happen on the Chemistry mailing list.
But for those being employees needing a legal clearance from their employer,
before they can contribute or mail to a mailing list, it is difficult to do
that in an early stage...
That's why we discussed that with
Florian,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Florian Müller fmuel...@opentext.com wrote:
Hi,
I can talk a bit about the OpenCMIS architecture. That might help to
distinguish it from Chemistry.
snip/
I hope that helps.
It does, thanks for sharing. However, it would help a lot more as a
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote:
Hi,
well, sorry that the discussion did not happen on the Chemistry mailing list.
But for those being employees needing a legal clearance from their employer,
before they can contribute or mail to a mailing list, it is
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Goetz, Paul paul.go...@sap.com wrote:
...well, sorry that the discussion did not happen on the Chemistry mailing
list.
But for those being employees needing a legal clearance from their employer,
before they
can contribute or mail to a mailing list, it
Hi Gianugo,
you wrote
I understand and sympathize, but if this is the kind of issues you are
facing, I would suggest that you have much bigger problems to solve
than an Open Source project. Actually, your statement is extremely
worrisome, as you should be aware that in Apache you have to act
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
As Gianugo says, the Chemistry folks are certainly the best people to
judge (together with you guys of course) whether your ideas can be
incorporated in Chemistry, or are better off in a separate project.
The Incubator's position is very probably that it's fine to
Hi,
I'm cross-posting this to general@ and chemistry-...@.
First let me say that I'm glad to see companies willing to open-source
their projects, that's always a good thing for the open source world
in general. I also understand that there is an existing and used
codebase from these companies
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:00 PM, Florent Guillaume f...@nuxeo.com wrote:
(or the fact that the code has not be released in any public manner yet)
Apologies, the code *is* released. Just not the discussions around its
design and its future.
Florent
--
Florent Guillaume, Director of RD, Nuxeo
Thanks Gavin :-)
I addressed all your points in LOG4PHP-90 for a later discussion.
Just one +1 necessary - please, if somebody has some time.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Gavin ga...@16degrees.com.au wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Christian Grobmeier [mailto:grobme...@gmail.com]
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable, eventually consistent, distributed,
structured key-value store.
Podling vote thread:
Hi all,
Joe has pointed out that I didn't include the link to the tarball and
signature:
http://people.apache.org/~todd/thrift-0.2.0-incubating-rc0.tar.gz
Signatures (mine and Joe's):
http://people.apache.org/~todd/thrift-0.2.0-incubating-rc0.tar.gz.asc
Tarball md5sum:
In particular Thrift is looking for 2 more +1's from
IPMC people in order to continue the release process.
Thanks!
- Original Message
From: Todd Lipcon t...@cloudera.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 2:50:04 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:17 AM, Michael Wechner
michael.wech...@wyona.com wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
As Gianugo says, the Chemistry folks are certainly the best people to
judge (together with you guys of course) whether your ideas can be
incorporated
On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 23:47 -0800, Todd Lipcon wrote:
The Thrift community voted on and has approved a proposal to release Thrift
0.2.0. Pursuant to the Releases section of the Incubation Policy, we would
now like to request the permission of the Incubator PMC to publish the
tarball on the
Hello everyone,
I would like to present an incubator proposal for a new Validation
podling, which would be a JSR-303 Bean Validation follow-on to the
existing Apache Commons Validation 1.x project, but based on a new
incoming codebase with a software grant from Agimatec GmbH.
The proposal
Hi Kevan,
Responses below:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Kevan Miller kevan.mil...@gmail.com wrote:
What's the license for the file: doc/thrift.tex?
This was contributed by Facebook, and thus falls under the Facebook
CLA as Apache 2.0 licensed. I'm not sure how it got missed in the
Hi Donald,
just to support you in the proposal and renew my interest on that project,
I've already been added in the possible contributors lists - I already
signed and sent the Apache ICLA.
Have a nice day, best regards,
Simone
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Donald Woods dwo...@apache.org
On Dec 10, 2009, at 9:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Thanks Gavin :-)
I addressed all your points in LOG4PHP-90 for a later discussion.
Just one +1 necessary - please, if somebody has some time.
I'll ditto my +1 from log4php-dev.
By my count, that is 3 +1 from IPMC members (antelder,
+1
...ant
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Eric Evans eev...@rackspace.com wrote:
The Cassandra community voted on and approved the release of Apache
Cassandra 0.5.0-beta2. We would now like to request the approval of the
Incubator PMC for this release.
Cassandra is a massively scalable,
A quick search so there has been some discussion on commons-dev - [1]
Does this really need to be incubated - the proposal says its intended
to graduate to Apache Commons and replace the existing Validator 1.x
component as a new 2.0 codebase, from the discussion on commons-dev
everyone seems fine
25 matches
Mail list logo
