Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:
...We voted on our project's list [2] for these release artifacts
and got four +1, out of which two are from Incubator's PMC members Bertrand
Delacretaz and Kevan Miller...
So we need just one additional vote, if
Hi,
+0 binding. I consider changing to +1 if some one posts a [VOTE][RESULT]
clearly indicating how many votes RC2 actually got and/or explain the situation.
- vote thread may have issues (see below)
- signatures are hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE and NOTICE all good
- release
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Justin Mclean
jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:
...To be fixed in next release:
The RC should be hosted on
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/devicemap...
You mean https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devicemap/ , right?
Hi,
You mean https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/devicemap/ , right?
Yes that's the correct URL. Not a blocker IMO as it can be moved to the correct
location once the vote is over.
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe,
Looks good to me. I just copied general@ since I missed that they fell
off. So yeah, whenever we can send it out.
@Roman I'm going to change your name to mine on the shepherding list, I
forgot to put mine back on after last month's surgery.
John
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Joe
Hi Justin,
We've had three voting sessions in the thread from [2] until we got
everything right with rc2:
1. browsermap-1.4.1-incubating: three +1 (Werner Keil, Reza Naghibi,
Eberhard Speer Jr.) and one -1 (Bertrand Delacretaz, for not complying with
RAT policies and for including derived files
Radu,
I think what Justin (and even myself) is looking for is a link to the
thread with the vote result.
John
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Justin,
We've had three voting sessions in the thread from [2] until we got
everything right with rc2:
The vote result is at [3].
Thanks,
Radu
[3] - http://devicemap.markmail.org/thread/wcgyx2gbxsn3ef5f
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 5:57 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Radu,
I think what Justin (and even myself) is looking for is a link to the
thread with the vote result.
John
Rahul,
Typically, the subject format is [RESULT] [VOTE]
Anyways that's a minor formality.
+1 binding on the release. It looks good to me.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:
The vote result is at [3].
Thanks,
Radu
[3] -
Thanks for the vote!
BTW, who's Rahul? :P
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rahul,
Typically, the subject format is [RESULT] [VOTE]
Anyways that's a minor formality.
+1 binding on the release. It looks good to me.
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at
One of my guys over here in the office... sorry about that :-)
John
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks for the vote!
BTW, who's Rahul? :P
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 7:35 PM, John D. Ament john.d.am...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rahul,
Typically, the
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2014
Wed August 06 -- Podling reports due by end of day
Sun August 10 -- Shepherd reviews due by end of day
Sun August 10 -- Summary due by end of day
Tue August 12 -- Mentor signoff due by end of day
Wed August 13 -- Report submitted to Board
Wed August 20
+1!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Aurora 0.5.0
incubating. This will be the first release for Aurora since entering the
Apache Incubator.
The source artifact to be voted on is:
+1 (non-binding)
On Jul 29, 2014, at 12:42 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote:
+1!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Aurora 0.5.0
incubating. This will be the first
+1 (binding)
Looks great everyone!
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Kevin Sweeney kevi...@apache.org wrote:
Hi All,
Please vote on releasing the following artifacts as Apache Aurora 0.5.0
incubating. This will be the first release for Aurora since entering the
Apache Incubator.
The
The 72 hour period is up and no -1’s, the vote passes.
B.
On 28 Jul 2014, at 11:37, Robert Samuel Newson rnew...@apache.org wrote:
Thanks! I’ve updated what I can, I’m waiting on the archives to notice the
couchdb vote thread that I just started.
B.
On 26 Jul 2014, at 16:50, David
Hi Radu,
3. browsermap-1.4.1-rc2-incubating: one +1 (Kevan Miller) - I removed some
redundant development dependencies
So you saying RC2 did only get +1 vote, not the needed 3 +1 votes by the
PPMC/IPMC before being voted on by the incubator.
What are the changes between RC1 and RC2? Are
HI,
-1 binding due to issues with NOTICE and LICENSE + no response to those issues
either on dev list or here.
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Hey Justin
I tackled both issues when they where brought up on the dev@aurora list and
it was communicated back on the vote thread and they are committed to
trunk. They where addressed in AURORA-600, from my vote
3.2 Top-level LICENSE and NOTICE are correct for each distribution.
- LICENSE and
Hi,
They where addressed in AURORA-600
Thanks for that. As the issue has been addressed and will be in the next
release changing my vote to:
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
20 matches
Mail list logo
