Hi all,
This is to call for a vote on releasing Apache Twill 0.5.0-incubating.
This is the sixth release for Twill.
Apache Twill is an abstraction over Apache Hadoop YARN that reduces
the complexity of developing distributed applications.
Vote on twill-dev:
http://s.apache.org/lfz
Result on
Hi.
Maybe a stupid question, but I cannot find the answer.
If we want to add a existing committer (one with an apache ID) to our
project as PPMC and committer, we of course have the normal vote.
If that person is not a committer of Incubator, do we then need to do
something additional to get
Ok let me try again.
I am in support of pTLP where it is clear it will work for a given project. Sam
makes a good point that if we are sure it will work why bother. Just make it a
TLP and be done with it. This version of orthogonal to the IPMC. I agree and I
think its a great idea.
My own
if we accept ... take a position, Ross.
The two problems *are* orthogonal. The IPMC can do whatever it likes. A
pTLP is a proposal to the Board.
Bertrand would like to see discussion on general@incubator, but that is
merely a handy location. It actually has zero to do with the Incubator.
Ross:
John,
Thank you very much for the offer of mentoring - I've added you to the list.
And I've renamed the proposal as CommonRDFProposal as that seems to be
naming style on the wiki.
Andy
On 22/02/15 20:56, John D. Ament wrote:
Lewis,
It looks like there were a few things called out.
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Hi Niclas,
I'm in favor of the overall pTLP process. I don't
agree with others that it hasn't been well specified yet. I
There is (yet) a singular page that defines the process. Roman has been
This is fantastic. Thanks you, Niclas!
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
Roman,
See comments below to
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Provisional+TLP
2.1 -- I suggest to change the word probationary to provisional. I
also
On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 3:36:50 AM jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
Maybe a stupid question, but I cannot find the answer.
If we want to add a existing committer (one with an apache ID) to our
project as PPMC and committer, we of course have the normal vote.
I'm assuming that the vote was
Hello,
This vote is open for more than a week and we still need one more IPMC vote.
Could somebody help us her?
Thanks
Leonidas Fegaras
On 02/22/2015 01:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Ping :)
Regards,
Alan
On Feb 18, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Leonidas Fegaras fega...@cse.uta.edu wrote:
Hello,
This
On 24 February 2015 at 12:19, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 3:36:50 AM jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
Hi.
Maybe a stupid question, but I cannot find the answer.
If we want to add a existing committer (one with an apache ID) to our
project as PPMC and
Stop talking about Incubator changes. You begin with pTLP, but devolve into
other proposals about changes to the Incubator.
Niclas restarted this thread about pTLP. That is all.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
ross.gard...@microsoft.com wrote:
Ok let me try
On 24 Feb 2015 08:36, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
If we want to add a existing committer (one with an apache ID) to our
project as PPMC and committer, we of course have the normal vote.
If that committer happens to also be an Apache Member, then it probably
would be great for that person to
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:12 AM, Niclas Hedhman nic...@hedhman.org wrote:
...
Sam -- Think there is no need for a new concept, and have no problem with
incoming projects backed by ASF veterans to bypass the Incubator.
I believe Sam gave this based on a singular, concrete proposal. He would
On 23/02/15 10:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hello,
2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org:
Lewis,
It looks like there were a few things called out.
- Identify a champion (looks like you did already)
- Solicit support from mentors.
It looks like those are the only two
Ok, take ur of the incubator list. Where my only comment is as power my mail
below:
PTLP is fine. Go do it (actually I'm with Sam, drop the p and thus drop the
confusion)
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Greg Steinmailto:gst...@gmail.com
Sent: 2/24/2015
So we will see more to report when it does make it in.
Some good, some bad.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:01 AM, John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org
wrote:
Oh ok, because of that you can't make it to this month's report ;-)
On Sun Feb 22 2015 at 6:16:25 PM Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
Yes, you still need to do a podling name search. Hopefully that will
show that the existing name is already good to start with and doesn't
conflict with other, pre-existing similar software products.
If the community intends to keep the name, we need a clear donation of
the trademark itself from
17 matches
Mail list logo
