Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Exciting! From: Poorna Chandra To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 5:29 PM Subject: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator Hi All, Tephra proposal was sent out for discussion last week. The proposal is available at

Re: Possible ASF Incubator Project transfer..

So you include it in conversations - there would also need to be discussions on the Glassfish trademark/any domains. Nothing as standardized as the software license grant others have referred to, but I would expect it to be 'if a registered trademark/domain, transferring to ASF; if not a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Incubator PMC, The release artifacts are now available under https://dist.apache.org. Please use the new locations given below. Artifacts for this release are given below: - Git tag for the release:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

On 03/06/2016 02:45 PM, Madhan Neethiraj wrote: > Incubator PMC, > > The release artifacts are now available under https://dist.apache.org. Please > use the new locations given below. > > Artifacts for this release are given below: > - Git tag for the release: >

Re: Update on Apache Toree and LGPL dependency

@john The 0mq ecosystem is made up of many projects of different sizes and maturity. In the case of JeroMQ, the committers are showing an overwhelming momentum to transition to MPL. I don't see any reason for us to consider any other alternative at this juncture. Gino B. > On Mar 5, 2016, at

Re: [VOTE] Release taverna-language-0.15.1-incubating-RC5 and taverna-osgi-0.2.1-incubating-RC5

Thank you for a thorough review! We've started tracking the Category B issues at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAVERNA-927 We would appreciate your insight and help as we are a bit short on active mentors! :-) The ZIP files under the test directory needs to be zipped because the

Re: Making license adjustment tools publicly available

To close a loop on this: based on the consensus I created a public version of the tools under: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/comdev/tools/licensing/ My attempts of preserving the history weren't successfully since private and public are two different SVN repos (you can't just svn cp/mv). I

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

+1 (binding) Checked signature, hash, and compared tarball to git tag. Built it successfully. Ran unit tests. Poked around. Licenses look good. St.Ack On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Ranger 0.5.2 (incubating)

Incubator PMC, Apologies for yet another location-change of the release artifacts. The artifacts are moved from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev; please use the new location given below. John - thanks for your guidance. Artifacts for this

Re: [VOTE] Accept Tephra into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Looking forward to this project. Thanks Naresh Agarwal On 7 Mar 2016 02:09, wrote: > +1 (binding) > Exciting! > > From: Poorna Chandra > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 5:29 PM > Subject: [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 1:21 PM Jean-Daniel Cryans wrote: > Hi, > > The PPMC vote to release Apache Kudu (incubating) 0.7.1 RC2 passed and I'm > now submitting this to the IPMC. > > Vote thread: > >

Re: Copyright sign offs

Henri, it seems I'm a bit lost with your terminology. See the question bellow: On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Haven't done this in a while :) > > Thought I'd share that the following podlings have not yet signed off on > their Copyright sections in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On 4 March 2016 at 11:40, Cheng, Hao wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Hao > > -Original Message- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunn...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 4, 2016 5:32 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Mnemonic