[DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

The FreeMarker community has discussed and voted positively on graduating to a TLP. We'd like to initiate this discussion to establish a consensus within the Incubator, and if appropriate, will initiate a recommendation vote. Status page: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/freemarker.html

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 > On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/DubboProposal >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi Justin, 2018-02-06 17:53 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > >> To clear discussion, the missing license body is specifically for >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L315 > > Again please carefully read [1] to comply you need to include a

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Thanks Justin, We did remove that jar before creating this RC0 but thanks for answering the question. Meghna On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Please let me know if anyone sees any other major issues in this file. > > Thanks - that's

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Thanks Justin! I have reviewed this PR and made a few more changes. The final changes to the LICENSE file can be summarized as follows - 1. I have reverted commit 8930d96 (PR #9484) 2. Revisited some comments from previous release which are

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi, > Please let me know if anyone sees any other major issues in this file. Thanks - that's looking a lot better. I did notice a question in the wiki page "Question 5: is it ok to include a necessary jar?”. Compiled source code can't be included in a source release so no it’s not OK to

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 > On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:57, vintagewang wrote: > > +1 > > On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> +1 >> >>> On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: >>> >>> Dear Apache Incubator Community, >>> >>>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 WangXin lovep...@hotmail.com 在 2018年2月7日，上午10:14，xin zhang > 写道： +1 On 7 Feb 2018, at 09:57, vintagewang > wrote: +1 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi, While it’s nice to see all the +1s this isn’t a vote thread. :-) Does anyone have any feedback on the proposal? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

Hi Henri and Justin, Thanks for the prompt feedbacks on the LICENSE file! I also posted a PR to update the years to be 2017-2018 in the NOTICE file. Furthermore, I created a task of moving all submodules to the 3rdparty folder in JIRA

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi sebb, On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 7:58 PM, sebb wrote: > On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: >> Hi Mark, >> >> Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the >> mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

+1 On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > +1 > > > On Feb 3, 2018, at 6:44 AM, Huxing Zhang wrote: > > > > Dear Apache Incubator Community, > > > > Please accept the following proposal for presentation and discussion: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, > To clear discussion, the missing license body is specifically for > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/LICENSE#L315 Again please carefully read [1] to comply you need to include a pointer to the full text of the license not a URL. If you need to download the license

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, Sorry links got removed for some reason. Again please read [1] and check the CC-BY license [2][, you may also want to read [3] re CC-BY which may be an issue here. However it's not clear what version of font awesome you are including the links provided refer to version 5 which is under

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, Yep looks like you are including Font Awesome 4.6.3 not 5. [1] A good reason to put the exact version of the 3rd party software somewhere so you know which license applies. Thanks, Justin 1.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi Justin, Thank you for your reply. 2018-02-06 16:12 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Note the mix of public and private lists (as I’m replying to where it was > sent). CC'd private@ to notify discussion to our project mentors. Changed to dev@ > From a quick look: > - In

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi, > Update the NOTICE file. > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE Look there is obvious a disconnect here and you are not understanding what isand required in regard with licensing and ASF policy. That's OK as incubating project, it's hard to understand and hard

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Justin, 2018-02-06 22:07 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > >> Update the NOTICE file. >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hivemall/blob/v0.5.0/NOTICE > > Look there is obvious a disconnect here and you are not understanding what > isand required in regard with licensing