[IP CLEARANCE] Apache DeltaSpike InterDyn

Good afternoon! I want to start IP CLEARANCE for Apache DeltaSpike InterDyn. I've moved over code I've developed years ago at https://github.com/struberg/interdyn It ever contained the full ASF headers anyway and is ALv2. I'm also the sole author of the code. This is for inclusion in Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

I think this is reasonably enough for this release. We should keep an eye on it and probably someone can upload a fixed release to maven.central. I've also checked the other parts and found no obvious problem So +1 (binding) txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 13.02.2018 um 08:32 schrieb

Re: Thoughts on Trademarks / Existing Domains on Podling Proposals / Reports

Thanks for the excellent question and Mark's thoughtful replies. Mark Thomas wrote on 2/13/18 4:27 AM: > On 12/02/18 23:24, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi - >> >> I think that the Incubator should adjust the proposal process when a project >> comes in that has registered trademarks. >> >> There are a

[DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Hello, I would like to propose Pinot as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available as a draft at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PinotProposal. I have also included the text of the proposal below. Any feedback from the community is much appreciated. Regards, Kishore G = Pinot

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

Hi everyone, The 0.5.0-RC2 vote failed with -1 binding votes. -1 votes (binding) and reasons: Justin Mclean - unexpended binary in source release Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/33eed30795cc211791ec93a48786ee3f9d8c0961896b9e731476ee9b@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E We'll

[RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Apache RocketMQ - RocketMQ CPP SDK project donation

Hi all, The IP Clearance vote is now closed and has passed with three +1 binding votes, and no -1s or 0s. Binding +1s: Jim Jagielski, Kevin A. McGrail and Justin Mclean. non-binding +1s: Longda Feng, Xin Wang, Huxing Zhang and Wang Xin. We will import the donation code to RocketMQ repo soon.

Re: Thoughts on Trademarks / Existing Domains on Podling Proposals / Reports

On 12/02/18 23:24, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi - > > I think that the Incubator should adjust the proposal process when a project > comes in that has registered trademarks. > > There are a few impacts to consider some of which may need to be private. > > (1) PODLINGNAMESEARCH may not be needed.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

Since the pull request was made about 8 hours ago, am I correct in thinking that the rc3 candidate still includes the jar with unknown contents and provenance? Mark, how could an EPL 1.0 jar with an AL 2 patch applied be uploaded to maven central? For one thing, what would the maven

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc3

That's a practical issue and not a legal one I'd say. But yes, finally I'd suggest to use different maven coordinates in the future at least. Otoh we do not even require that this file is on maven.central. Just downloadable form a private http page or on github would be perfectly enough FROM A

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

John, we have an ICLA for Jessica now. However, Intel is maintaining the position that it shouldn't be required to identify the software granted in detail but rather stating the top-level project it is granted to should be sufficient. Furthermore, they argue that they have done that many times

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Pinot is already quite popular and I think it will be an awesome addition under the Apache umbrella. +1 (non-binding) On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:10 AM, kishore g wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose Pinot as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal > is available

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Apache Felix Bundle Archive File Installer Extension

Yes, an ICLA on file should suffice. John On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:07 PM Karl Pauls wrote: > John, > > we have an ICLA for Jessica now. > > However, Intel is maintaining the position that it shouldn't be > required to identify the software granted in detail but rather

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Agreed.  It could use more mentors from ASF which I'm too overloaded to help with but I'd be inclined to +1 this.  Do you have some thoughts on getting more community people outside of LI and Uber to help? On 2/13/2018 7:07 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: Noir or Blanc? Gris or Grigio? What’s the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Love to see this in the incubator as well. +1 Tim On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 4:22 PM, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > Agreed. It could use more mentors from ASF which I'm too overloaded to help > with but I'd be inclined to +1 this. Do you have some thoughts on getting >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Noir or Blanc? Gris or Grigio? What’s the vintage? All kidding aside this looks interesting. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 13, 2018, at 12:10 AM, kishore g wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to propose Pinot as an Apache Incubator project. The proposal > is

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Kevin, Increasing the adoption of Pinot is one thing that can help build a good diverse community. Few things that come to my mind - Improve documentation - Better integration with cloud providers - Meetup and blog posts. We would also love to get additional mentors from ASF to help us build the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Pinot Incubator Proposal

Hi Kishore well I think as you are an ASF member you can add yourself as a mentor :-) On 14 February 2018 at 01:01, kishore g wrote: > Kevin, > > Increasing the adoption of Pinot is one thing that can help build a good > diverse community. Few things that come to my mind >

[DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - February 2018

All, Below is the current draft of the IPMC report. Of note is that the Slider report still needs mentor sign off. Hopefully that will come soon. I'm going to give it one more day and plan to submit the report on Thursday. Incubator PMC report for February 2018 The Apache Incubator is the

[VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC1

Hi all, As we have updated the LICENSE file which caused the failure vote for Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0.RC0, this is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release candidate 1. Apache MXNet (incubating) community has voted and approved the release. Vote thread: