[VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

2018-04-12 Thread Ohad Shacham
Hi, The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0-incubating. PPMC Vote Call:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-omid-dev/201804.mbox/%3cCAHuxFyN_uzAb12=AS-WyVXiwn1KTwmk2SY4=b1f6zktwebu...@mail.gmail.com%3e PPMC Vote Result:

RE: The role of a mentor

2018-04-12 Thread ross
I agree with the observations and clarifications to my post. I should perhaps have prefaced my opinion with "If I agree to mentor I assume I will [read everything] for the first x months and then monitor for problems after that" This is why I've not mentored a project for some time. It *is*

Re: Milagro Rescue Roadmap

2018-04-12 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi Nick, On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Nick Kew wrote: > ...I think what we need right now is a roadmap to bring work > to Apache. That'll need the Milagro community to identify > what's holding it back, and us all to determine whether it > makes sense to resolve at apache

Re: Milagro Rescue Roadmap

2018-04-12 Thread Ted Dunning
I think a key task here is to help people understand that retirement does not me and that the community dies. What means in many respects is the community's freed of the Apache process. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018, 09:16 Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi Nick, > > On Thu, Apr

Re: Milagro Rescue Roadmap

2018-04-12 Thread John D. Ament
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 11:35 AM Nick Kew wrote: > Posting to both dev@milagro and general@incubator. > As champion for Milagro, I feel responsible for this. > > In retrospect, Milagro probably entered the incubator > prematurely. It has got hung up on issues of process > and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

2018-04-12 Thread Matt Sicker
* Signatures ok * Disclaimer, license, notice ok * Rat check ok I am, however, getting a test failure: Failed tests: TestTSOClientConnectionToTSO.testSuccessOfTSOClientReconnectionsToARestartedTSOWithZKPublishing:214 » Execution

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

2018-04-12 Thread Alan Gates
Forwarding my +1 from the dev list. Alan. On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > * Signatures ok > * Disclaimer, license, notice ok > * Rat check ok > > I am, however, getting a test failure: > > Failed tests: > >

[DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate Traffic Control to a top level project

2018-04-12 Thread Dave Neuman
Hello IPMC, Per the graduation guidelines, the Traffic Control community would like to start a DISCUSS thread on graduating to a top level project. We have discussed internally on private, taken a vote to draft a resolution [1], and voted on the resolution [2]. The next step in the process is to

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread William Guo
hi guys, We need your help to verify our release, Could you please spend some time to vote for us if you are free at the moment. Thanks, William On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 1:07 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > * Signatures ok > * Disclaimer, notice, license ok > - As an aside, I

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > I reviewed this JSON license we've mentioned in license file: (The JSON > License) JSON in Java (org.json:json:20140107 - > https://github.com/douglascrockford/JSON-java > ) > It is transitive dependency from

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Matt Sicker
On 12 April 2018 at 22:43, Lionel Liu wrote: > > 2. Only things that are actually bundled in the release should be mentioned > in LICENSE. [3][4] > > To my understanding, as a source release, all the dependencies are bundled > when it is built. > The dependencies are not

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 binding The source LICENSE mentions: - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even if it is not included in the source release. [1] - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and cannot be included in a source release. [2] Only things that are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Dave Fisher
> On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:53 PM, William Guo wrote: > > +1 > > > rat passed. > > sha1 checked. > > all GPL are dual licensed either CDDL or 'Apache License version 2.0’ Please see https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html Is

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread William Guo
Hi Dave, For those GPL+CDDL dependencies, we are not packaging them in source release. Thanks, William On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Dave Fisher wrote: > > On Apr 9, 2018, at 10:53 PM, William Guo wrote: > > +1 > > > rat passed. > > sha1 checked. >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Matt Sicker
On 12 April 2018 at 18:49, Justin Mclean wrote: > The source LICENSE mentions: > - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even > if it is not included in the source release. [1] > - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread William Guo
Thanks for your inputs. ok, we will go through and check our license. Thanks, William On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:53 AM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 12 April 2018 at 18:49, Justin Mclean wrote: > > > The source LICENSE mentions: > > - JSON licensed

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Lionel Liu
Hi Justin, Thanks a lot for your review, I have some questions: 1. The source LICENSE mentions: - JSON licensed software - this is category X and can’t be dependancy even if it is not included in the source release. [1] - CDDL and EPL license software there are category B and cannot be included

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Griffin-0.2.0-incubating [RC3]

2018-04-12 Thread Lionel Liu
Thanks Justin and Matt, then we'll clean up the unbundled dependencies' licenses for our source release. Thanks, Lionel On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:09 PM, Matt Sicker wrote: > On 12 April 2018 at 22:43, Lionel Liu wrote: > > > > 2. Only things that are

Milagro Rescue Roadmap

2018-04-12 Thread Nick Kew
Posting to both dev@milagro and general@incubator. As champion for Milagro, I feel responsible for this. In retrospect, Milagro probably entered the incubator prematurely. It has got hung up on issues of process and infrastructure, and project activity hasn't migrated to apache. John has, for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Omid 0.9.0.0 (incubating)

2018-04-12 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 binding as NOTICE is incorrect. The NOTICE file need to be keep as small as possible [1] I checked: - incubating in file name - signatures good although it would be best to sign with an apache.org email address - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE file contains wrong year (2016) and incorrectly