Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On 2018-05-23 20:57, Emilian Bold wrote: Ate, could we get a vote on this release? Sure :-) If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already making progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported. Yes, thanks for creating the

Re: Minified Javascript in source releases (was Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3)

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 2:52 AM Justin Mclean > wrote: >>... Do people think it OK to include minified JS in a source release if: >> 1. It's ASF developed code and the full unminified source code is

Re: Minified Javascript in source releases (was Re: [VOTE] ReleaseApache ECharts (incubating) 4.1.0.rc3)

>>... Do people think it OK to include minified JS in a source release if: >> 1. It's ASF developed code and the full unminified source code is included >> as well. +1, and I suggest you could provide a document to help people, who want to verify the minified js. Such as: how to generate the

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crail 1.0-incubating (RC3)

Hi, At the moment there is no way to run the tests without setting up a configuration for your system (Crail needs hugepage mountpoint, network interfaces etc). For that reason we instruct people in the README to build with "-DskipTests". If you want to deploy/configure Crail to run the

[IP CLEARANCE] Dubbox documentation

The Apache Dubbo (incubating) is receiving a documentation donation for the rest support and more protocol support features[1](previously known as Dubbox) from Dangdang. The acceptance vote has passed on the d...@dubbo.apache.org mailing list [2] Please vote to approve this contribution. This

[VOTE] Pulsar Release 2.0.0-rc1-incubating Candidate 5

This is the fifth release candidate for Apache Pulsar, version 2.0.0-rc1-incubating. Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics, guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbox documentation

Hi John I'm little confused. For the new incubating projects, it's make sense that the initial code should go through the SGA, and CLA thing. But if the code donation happens few month after the initial code transfer, do we still need to treat the project as a new projects? I found there are

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 binding. One odd thing I noticed was the existence of these directories in the source tarball, but since they don't contain any files they can be addressed in the next release: apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/${project.basedir}/ apache-tephra-0.14.0-incubating/${project.basedir}/src

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 12:33 AM, Emilian Bold wrote: > We now kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this > incubator release candidate... -1 for the release of incubating-netbeans-java-9.0-rc1-source.zip for now due to the below open

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1 (binding) Verified source bundle signature and hashes and disclaimer. Verified build and distribution artifact (no live testing). Tephra release vote findings/improvements for consideration: 1) Use of md5 hashes worth removing in future releases 2) Copyright year in source and binary notice

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Slider podling

+1 On Sun, May 20, 2018, 10:59 Billie Rinaldi wrote: > After a long period of low activity, the Slider PPMC has recently decided > upon retirement [1]. Please vote on whether we should retire the Slider > podling. Here is my +1 (binding). > > [ ] +1 Retire Slider > [ ] +0 No

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.14.0-incubating [rc1]

+1. Did a build in a fresh repo, looked over the LICENSE and NOTICE files, ran rat. Rat initially fails, but on further inspection all the files it's complaining about are the other license files. I believe there's a way to exclude these files from the rat run. In the future it would be good

Re: [IP CLEARANCE] Dubbox documentation

Huxing, Please note per the top paragraph of [1] the IP Clearance process is not for new projects (incubating projects). John [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:03 AM Huxing Zhang wrote: > The Apache Dubbo (incubating) is receiving a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...The license files listed in the Rat report are known and an issue exists >>> for solving this: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-305 ... It's not clear to me whether that ticket

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

See this page, most/several items are mentioned there, including the new splash screen: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 Note that we're not working on the final release of Apache NetBeans, but on its release candidate. Indeed, this is confusing --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

The list of licenses in the issue are the same as yours. It is a known issue and discussed there, see the description of the issue, which has a list of licenses that matches yours. Gj On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Or at least the 2nd comment in that issue lists those licenses. I believe they are orphaned license files with their related libraries removed or resolved. We do need to investigate this, though I do not believe they’re a blocker for the release candidate. Gj On Wednesday, May 23, 2018, Geertjan

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Hi, > So, overall, it seems to me it is a better service for the users of the > release to have the license included, than to hide it? IMO (but just my personal opinion) it does nothing to serve the users other than to confuse them that GPL software may be bundled or may be a dependancy of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

And the open issue is mentioned directly in the vote thread itself by Emilian: The license files listed in the Rat report are known and an issue exists >> for solving this: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NETBEANS-305 > > Gj On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:35 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > ...I believe > they are orphaned license files with their related libraries removed or > resolved. We do need to investigate this, though I do not believe they’re a > blocker for the release

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On 23 May 2018 at 09:18, Justin Mclean wrote: > IMO (but just my personal opinion) it does nothing to serve the users > other than to confuse them that GPL software may be bundled or may be a > dependancy of the software. License checkers will flag this as an issue as >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

> A number of licenses mentioned in the LICENSE file are not mentioned > at https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html, have they been cleared > and if so do we have URLs of those clearances or discussions? > > That's the following licenses: > ISO-8879-SGML > EDL-1.0 > W3C2 > OASIS > WSDL-2004 I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 5:35 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > I have created these issues to track these licenses... Thank you - I have set the fix version to 9.0 on these issues, IIUC that's the correct way to make sure they are fixed before the non-RC release? With this I

Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache Dubbo (Incubating) 2.6.2 [RC1]

Hi All, I am canceling this vote and prepare for a new release candidate RC2. Thanks for Willem, Ian and Justin for pointing out the issues in this candidate, we expect to address the following issues RC2: - Resolve scheme compatibility problems[1]. - Remove the MD5 hashes in RC1 - Rename the

Re: [VOTE] Retire the Slider podling

IANAM, so from the peanut gallery: +1 Best regards, Pierre Smits Apache Trafodion , Vice President Apache Directory , PMC Member Apache Incubator , committer Apache OFBiz ,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

Ate, could we get a vote on this release? If you look at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+9.0+RC1 we are already making progress on the (non-blocking) issues reported. --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma