My understanding is that only source-code releases are official releases.
Binaries are just a convenience and not official, so I don't think you have
to worry about making images available via DockerHub, even if that is the
primary way most people install.
Dave
On Sun, Feb 3, 2019 at 1:00 PM
Hello all,
This VOTE is closed and passes. It was open for 14 days (mostly
because of PNS search).
I'll create a separate RESULT thread for the voting details but here's
the summary :
+1 x 17
+1 (binding) x 10
+1 (non-binding) x 7
Thanks, everyone for helping Apache Unomi reach this great
Hello Daniel,
I'd like to close the vote soon but as you voted -1 because of the
lack of PNS we need your new vote.
For your information, here's the completed and accepted PNS [1].
Best regards,
Serge Huber.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-161
On Tue, Jan 22,
+1 - still in brussels, so lagging behind on email :)
On 04/02/2019 11.10, Serge Huber wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I'd like to close the vote soon but as you voted -1 because of the
lack of PNS we need your new vote.
For your information, here's the completed and accepted PNS [1].
Best regards,
Dmitry,
I agree that there are lots of technical things to discuss and I won't stop
anyone doing that but I'd like to keep this thread about the proposal and
the project itself knowing that technical stuff is what most of us do and
like to do and it's also more interesting but let's get the
Hi all,
Here are the results for the Apache Unomi graduation vote :
+1 x 17
+1 (binding) x 10
+1 (non-binding) x 7
No -1 or 0 votes.
You can find the thread for the vote here :
Oh and one more thing that I at least want to mention is the name. I know
that podlings can do a name search after the incubation has started.
We thought about using "Training" as the proper name though. It's very
descriptive and easy to understand/recognize in multiple languages.
Hi Justin,
We need a formulation which enables pre-release QA by non-coding
contributors. I've given my attempt at formulating it. Please give your
take on how to accomplish this.
Best Regards,
Myrle
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:01 PM Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This does *not* include
Dave Fisher wrote on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 09:35 -0800:
> > On Feb 4, 2019, at 8:49 AM, Thorsten Behrens
> > wrote:
> > 3. if bugtracker, mailing list archives and the like are _not_
> > preserved or archived somewhere - if TDF could get a copy of at
> > least the public part of that data for
Thorsten Behrens wrote on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 17:49 +0100:
> 2. adding a pointer from the ASF website
>https://incubator.apache.org/projects/odftoolkit.html to the new
>TDF website for the project, such that people looking for it still
>find the active project:
> - perhaps also
Hi Justin,
Everything looks good. Thank you!
By the way, I've noticed that some podling communities have been less
active since last week. The lunar new year day, tomorrow, might have
affected them, especially where most committers are working in Korea
or China. That can't be an excuse though.
Hi Justin,
This looks good.
in your general notice about releases, please include a note about nightly
builds, and any other non-releases which communities can make.
In other words, after: "This includes docker, githubb, PyPi, npm and any
other platform for
publishing releases, and also covers
Thanks Daniel for replying so quickly, greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Serge...
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 11:25 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
> +1 - still in brussels, so lagging behind on email :)
>
> On 04/02/2019 11.10, Serge Huber wrote:
> > Hello Daniel,
> >
> > I'd like to close the vote soon but
Hi Lars,
About the project: I've got only one thing to say here: Apache Incubator is
intended to be a place where a community is build up and everybody (mostly
newcomers) learn guides and policies. So straight-to-TLP is also a possible
option, but some incubation process isn't bad at all. But
The vote carries. Thank you
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:22 PM Felix Cheung wrote:
>
> +1
> (Checked IP clearance)
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:57 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > Apache Arrow is receiving a donation of "DataFusion" a Rust library
> > that computes analytical queries on Arrow
Hi,
The NetBeans incubating community has approved the release of Apache
NetBeans parent pom. Vote thread is here [1] and the result is 5 +1 ([2]).
This is a small artefact that put together the basic information for the
"Apache Maven world" so artefacts under Apache NetBeans (incubating) we
Hi,
> This does *not* include nightly builds, or other project *internal* artifacts
> used for quality control and experimentation.”
Actually it does apply and those builds can’t be offered directly to the
general public, but each of the platforms has mechanisms for doing that.
For instance,
Hi -
> On Feb 4, 2019, at 8:49 AM, Thorsten Behrens
> wrote:
>
> Dear people,
>
> one of your committers (Michael Stahl, in Cc) last year asked to
> migrate the retired ODF Toolkit project over to the Document
> Foundation, which TDF would be happy to accept.
>
> Volunteers from various
Dear people,
one of your committers (Michael Stahl, in Cc) last year asked to
migrate the retired ODF Toolkit project over to the Document
Foundation, which TDF would be happy to accept.
Volunteers from various sides have helped moving stuff; a few things
are though still left to do, thus this
Hi all,
finally having some time to read through the proposal, I too would be
interested in participating.
I do have quite a bit of experience in creating trainings as this is part of my
job at codecentric.
For the ASF I have for example prepared a Maven training, which I held in
Vancouver a
Hi Chris,
thanks for chiming in and your offer!
The setup you describe sounds pretty much exactly what we envisioned
when we started looking at infrastructure around trainings - back then
I think it just sort of died down for a mixture of reasons like too
much effort for just the few trainings
+1(binding)
Thanks,
Lionel
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 7:01 PM William Guo wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> William
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 5:59 PM Hongtao Gao wrote:
>
> > +1(non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks Hongtao Gao
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019, 5:47 PM Xin Wang >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
Hi all,
I have been creating training material for various big data apache projects
(mostly Apache Spark) for the last five years and we would like to contribute
those. I for myself have not been directly involved with the ASF directly,
however I have been contributing to some open source
Hello all,
The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X 0.3.0-RC2 (incubating) is closed, now.
Vote result:
3 (+1 binding) (Stefan Bodewig, Justin McLean, Christofer Dutz)
0 ( 0 binding)
0 (-1 binding)
No non-binding votes.
Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us.
I
Dmitry, Kenneth,
sorry for the slow replies. I was offline on vacation for a few days. I'll
add both of you to the Wiki (if you haven't already done so).
I love that we have gathered quite a few interested people to participate
already but I'd love to hear more (or any really) opinions on the
25 matches
Mail list logo
