Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Hi Thanks Justin for the clarification. I guess the policy imply the source materials cannot have any binary. But what if the binary is only for testing, which cannot be part of the released software. >From my point of view, we don't need to modify the source materials testing binary to do the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karaf version 0.1.2

Hi, Just forwarding my +1 bind from dev list. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 8:54 AM Adrian Cole wrote: > > Hello All, > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) > for Apache Karaf version 0.1.2 > > The Apache Zipkin

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Normally we don't distribute the test jar outside, I'm not sure if I can find a good place to host these jars. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 2:47 PM Alex Harui wrote: > > Or, can you change your build script to download the jar instead of packaging

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Willem, This issue of embedded binaries for testing purposes has come up before. Examples include network intercepts for testing malware detection or class files for a byte code manipulator. The network files can't easily be recreated since they were observed in the wild and the class files might

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi Craig, Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2019, at 4:12 PM, Craig Russell wrote: >> On Feb 19, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Dave Fisher wrote: >> >> Hi - >> >> (1) To be fixed on the next release: >>(a) Please do not include the KEYS file in the source release zip. Refer >> the users back to the

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Actually, I find that early drafts are easier to work on using gdocs. Once things settle down, the wiki is a very good place. On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 12:35 PM lee...@gmail.com wrote: > > > On 2019/02/23 18:54:57, leerho wrote: > > Forgive me I am a newbie, but there has got to be a better way

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Hi, For testing purpose.. why cant provide bin artifacts in a separate convenience binary package as its being done in many other projects.. why it should be part of source package.? For the easy detection.. bin artifacts can have same version number as source. Again.. Official voting is on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Zipkin Brave (incubating) for Apache Karafversion 0.1.2

+1 binding Checked 1. LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE exist. 2. Apache rat check passed. 3. asc checked. 4. Maven compile passed. 5. No wrapper jar (recheck because of last release failure) 6. sha512 exists and checked. -- Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin Twitter,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Cava into the Apache Incubator

+1 -Vinay On Fri, 22 Feb 2019, 7:22 am Huxing Zhang, wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 3:50 AM Antoine Toulme > wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > we've discussed the proposal for the Cava project in [1] and [2]. The > > proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. > >

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Or, can you change your build script to download the jar instead of packaging it in the source release? On 2/23/19, 6:02 PM, "Ted Dunning" wrote: Willem, This issue of embedded binaries for testing purposes has come up before. Examples include network intercepts for testing

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

Hi Ted, You made a good point, I think my solution could be building the jars from source and then using it for testing. Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 10:02 AM Ted Dunning wrote: > > Willem, > > This issue of embedded binaries for testing purposes

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Forgive me I am a newbie, but there has got to be a better way to post a document that everyone can see and allow it to be updated without having to resend it as raw text. I have an easier to read version of the proposal as a Google doc where I could post the link, but I sense that that is a

Add to Wiki ContributorsGroup

Lee Rhodes

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

On 2019/02/23 18:54:57, leerho wrote: > Forgive me I am a newbie, but there has got to be a better way to post a > document that everyone can see and allow it to be updated without having to > resend it as raw text. I have an easier to read version of the proposal as > a Google doc where I

[PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [Cava] Suitable name search - choosing a name

+1 for 'Jal' Nice sounding, different, short. . Best regards, Pierre Smits *Apache Trafodion , Vice President* *Apache Directory , PMC Member* Apache Incubator , committer *Apache OFBiz

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Hi, > === Nominated Mentors === > (Recommended to me: ) > > Liang Chen, Vice President of Apache CarbonData, [chenliang613 at apache > dot org] > Jean-Baptiste Onofré, jb at nanthrax dot net > Gil Yehuda, gyehuda at verizonmedia dot com Currently only IPMC members can be official mentors, of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Hi, If possible, I would like to contribute DataSketches as mentor too. Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI 23 Şub 2019 Cmt, saat 14:59 tarihinde Justin Mclean < jus...@classsoftware.com> şunu yazdı: > Hi, > > > === Nominated Mentors === > > (Recommended to me: ) > > > > Liang Chen, Vice President of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache DataSketches

Hi, > Currently only IPMC members can be official mentors, of the 3 people listed > here I believe only Jean-Baptiste Onofré is an IPMC member. Sorry, my apologies, Liang Chen is also an IPMC member, (Chen Liang, and presumedly a different person, is a committer but not an IPMC member) but I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

That's for all the response from everyone so far. We'll make sure to fix the KEYS issue for the next release. DAFFODIL-2070 [1] was created to track that issue, and we plan to fix it in the next release. Other comments inline. On 2/22/19 3:45 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I have