Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.1 [RC2]

2019-08-14 Thread Clint Wylie
>Given you have soured files from all those project the minimum would be the project name and copyright line, I’m not seeing that. [1] I've opened a PR to adjust NOTICE and NOTICE.BINARY files to include the copyright notices which were previously removed,

[VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Zhijie Shen
Hi all, After gauging the interest of MesaTEE (discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/323983a2875dd44ef19a3771ec329d5920d4d04bbdde18aab70dbe08@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E), I would like to call a VOTE to accept it into the Apache Incubator. Please cast your vote: [ ]

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Greg, I think Justins Answer refers to the WIP-Disclaimer which was recently added to the incubator Policy Page: https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers A Podlings releasing with the WIP Disclaimer is no ASF release, so I consider Justins response is no misdirection

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019, 22:31 David Nalley wrote: >... > Greg - I propose that you, Ross (sorry for volunteering you), and I > pick an incubating project in need of mentor attention and make this > as streamlined as we can. Let's focus on educating and enabling and > not gatekeeping. Let's prove

Re: [VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
+1 (binding) (I see you now have 4 mentors, do you still need one more?) On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 23:40:47 -0700, Zhijie Shen wrote: > Hi all, > > After gauging the interest of MesaTEE (discussion thread: >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) v2.0.2

2019-08-14 Thread Joshua Poore
Hi Justin, Please clarify your VOTE. Are we at -1 or 0 from you? If its a 0 - "consider fixing a few issues”. I can easily roll a new release with DISCLAIMERS in bin push as new release package so that this issue can be vetted prior to release, but doesn’t require another VOTE altogether.

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, > That Infra and the board will allow a podling to put packages containing the > WIP-disclaimer on dist.a.o as long as those packages Infra have already confirmed that’s OK, legal have said it OK with some conditions, including if incubator releases are considered special. There is a

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-08-14 Thread Paul King
+1 (binding) Good luck! Cheers, Paul. On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:03 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > The Apache Druid community has recently discussed our readiness for > graduation [1] and voted on it affirmatively [2, 3]. We've also assessed > ourselves against the maturity model [4] and collaborated

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi Thanks for the idea and offer of help. > 1) Concurrent with the start of a release vote by a PPMC, the IPMC is > to be notified that that vote is happening. IPMC members are > encouraged to participate in the vote process on the PPMC list where > it is happening. This has been discussed

Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

2019-08-14 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
Hi Podlings! in less than a month we're going to have our first ApacheCON this year -- the one in Las Vegas. In about two month there will be one more in Berlin. These are not your regular ApacheCONs -- these are 20th Anniversary of ASF ApacehCONs! In other words, these are not to be missed!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flagon UserALE.js (Incubating) v2.0.2

2019-08-14 Thread Joshua Poore
General@ Following Justin’s comment below—Disclaimer missing from .bin release packages—I have repackaged release candidate #1 to include Disclaimers and pushed to https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/flagon/ . As this

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-08-14 Thread Jitendra Pandey
+1 (binding) On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 5:48 PM Paul King wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Good luck! > Cheers, Paul. > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 5:03 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > > > The Apache Druid community has recently discussed our readiness for > > graduation [1] and voted on it affirmatively [2, 3].

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.1 [RC2]

2019-08-14 Thread Clint Wylie
Hi all, The vote to release Apache Druid (incubating) 0.15.1 has passed with 3 +1 binding votes: Justin Mclean Julian Hyde Furkan KAMACI and 1 non-binding +1 vote: William Guo Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f97a3743e441747552f54dd61148366d808883e33d55cab0d5161770@ Thank

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 00:33 Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > > Q: Does the IPMC want to produce non-ASF releases? > > A: We already are Not true, as you well know. Whether we call the above a lie, or misdirection is left to the reader. The IPMC currently attempts to ensure all podling releases

Re: [DISCUSS] Incubation Proposal of MesaTEE

2019-08-14 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
On Sat, 10 Aug 2019 10:12:59 -0500, Matt Sicker wrote: > I’d most likely be interested in mentoring this project, but I’m not that > experienced in incubator mentorship. If we have another more experienced > mentor to work with us, I’d be happy to mentor as well. I can also join as mentor.

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019, 06:00 Julian Feinauer wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I think Justins Answer refers to the WIP-Disclaimer Aware of that, but disagree. It is way more: the IPMC vote is performed to establish legal oversight and shield. I suggest that is burdensome and should be tossed. PS.: Allow

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, I’m not referring to a recent thing, I’m referring to in part to this [1]. I suggest you read what Mark wrote there, but even before this JIRA many Apache podlings have made non-offical releases for a number of reasons some in line with policy (and some not). I can point you to one

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Sam Ruby
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:24 AM Justin Mclean wrote: > > Hi, > > >> This is because of ASF bylaws i.e only PMC votes are binding on releases. > > > > That is not in the Bylaws. Stop making stuff up. > > That the way it’s been explained to me, several times, by experienced ASF > people, that only

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

2019-08-14 Thread Alex Harui
IMO, the key change as already been made: There is now a WIP-disclaimer. AFAICT, the rest of this thread has been an attempt to create an objective process around a subjective topic (in this case risk). The better use of time may be to just launch an experiment by making the one change

Re: [VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Furkan KAMACI
Hi, Definitely +1! Kind Regards, Furkan KAMACI 14 Ağu 2019 Çar, saat 19:35 tarihinde Luciano Resende şunu yazdı: > +1 > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:41 PM Zhijie Shen wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > After gauging the interest of MesaTEE (discussion thread: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-08-14 Thread Gian Merlino
By the way, I am going to be away from email from tomorrow til Sunday; so, assuming the vote proceeds successfully, and in the interest of timing with respect to the next board meeting, another Druid PPMC member will likely tally and post the results after the 72-hr period instead of me. Thanks

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

2019-08-14 Thread David Lim
Thanks for all your hard work Gian! I'd be happy to close out the vote and bring the results to the attention of the appropriate people in your absence. David On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 1:09 PM Gian Merlino wrote: > By the way, I am going to be away from email from tomorrow til Sunday; so, >

[GitHub] [incubator] gianm opened a new pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL

2019-08-14 Thread GitBox
gianm opened a new pull request #29: Adjust Incubator status URL URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator/pull/29 - Fix path to include 'projects' rather than 'project' - Changed http to https (http works, but IMO preferring https when available is a good practice)

Re: [VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Matt Sicker
+1, looking forward to mentoring this community! On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 07:12, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > +1 (binding) > > (I see you now have 4 mentors, do you still need one more?) > > On Tue, 13 Aug 2019 23:40:47 -0700, Zhijie Shen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After gauging the interest of

Re: [VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Kenneth Knowles
+1 On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:34 AM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > Hi, > > Definitely +1! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > 14 Ağu 2019 Çar, saat 19:35 tarihinde Luciano Resende > > şunu yazdı: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:41 PM Zhijie Shen wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept MesaTEE into Apache Incubator

2019-08-14 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:41 PM Zhijie Shen wrote: > > Hi all, > > After gauging the interest of MesaTEE (discussion thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/323983a2875dd44ef19a3771ec329d5920d4d04bbdde18aab70dbe08@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E), > I would like to call a VOTE to