[VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-09-20 Thread Andrew Bayer
projects within the scope of responsibility ofThe Apache jclouds Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be andhereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of TheApache jclouds Project: * Adrian Cole (adrianc...@apache.org) * Andrew Bayer

Re: [VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-09-20 Thread Andrew Bayer
itial members of The Apache jclouds Project: * Adrian Cole (adrianc...@apache.org) * Andrew Bayer(aba...@apache.org) * Andrew Gaul (g...@apache.org) * Andrew Phillips (andr...@apache.org) * Becca Wood (silky...@apache.org) * Everett Toews (ever..

Re: [VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-09-23 Thread Andrew Bayer
Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing anything for graduation. Thanks! A. On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > argh, line breaks all vanished in weird ways. Here's a better format: > > The Apache jclouds project ent

[RESULT]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-09-23 Thread Andrew Bayer
57 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Reminder - it'd be great to get more eyes and make sure we're not missing > anything for graduation. Thanks! > > A. > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> argh, line breaks all vanished in weird ways. Here's

[RESULT]: [VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-10-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
Trying to get the vote monitor to pick this up... On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > The vote has closed, and it has passed, with 5 binding IPMC +1s and 8 PPMC > +1s. > > +1 binding: > - David Nalley (from PPMC vote) > - Suresh Marru (from PPMC vote) >

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC2

2013-10-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
This was cancelled ages ago, trying to get the vote status monitor to pick it up. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hello, > > This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > the first jclouds release at Apache. > > The PPM

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-10-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
This was cancelled ages ago, trying to get the vote status monitor to pick it up. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Hello, > > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > the first jclouds release at Apache. > > We are ca

[RESULT] [VOTE]: Graduate Apache jclouds as an Apache Top Level Project

2013-10-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
One more time... On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Trying to get the vote monitor to pick this up... > > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> The vote has closed, and it has passed, with 5 binding IPMC +1s and 8 >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Provisionr join the Apache Incubator

2013-03-07 Thread Andrew Bayer
A little belated, but I'd be interested in helping out as well. A. On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Andrei Savu wrote: > I think the proposal is now ready for voting. I will go ahead and start a > new thread. > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ProvisionrProposal > > Thank you all! > > -- Andre

[VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-30 Thread Andrew Bayer
Hello, This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, the first jclouds release at Apache. We are calling this vote on both the IPMC and the jclouds PPMC at the same time, as the code for this release has already been vetted by the jclouds developers leading up to this R

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-30 Thread Andrew Bayer
-incubating-rc1 resulted to > 404? > > - Henry > > > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > This is the first release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, > > the first jclouds release at Apache. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-30 Thread Andrew Bayer
;jclouds's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release:" - copy-paste fail! A. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Whoops - the link was actually > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/jclouds-1.6.1-incubating-candidate-1/ - > I've symlinked them to be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-30 Thread Andrew Bayer
...and fwiw, I'm +1, PPMC. A. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > A couple other little fixes: > > The incubator-jclouds.git tag is actually at > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-jclouds.git;a=tag;h=d47a21038aafbc4d855444904e03ab1406b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-30 Thread Andrew Bayer
an exclusion, but we'd like to make sure we know what can get away with not having a license header and what can't before we change that. A. On May 30, 2013, at 7:41 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: >> Hello, >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
" wrote: > Just an observation: > jclouds-cli-pom-1.6.1-incubating-source-release.tar.gz root has 2 LICENSE > files? > LICENSE and LICENSE.txt > jclouds-labs-1.6.1-incubating-source-release.tar.gz root is missing > LICENSE/NOTICE ? > >> -Original Message-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating

2013-05-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
ce in labs, and anything else that comes up. I'll cut another RC this afternoon PDT, once I've addressed those problems and waited to see what additional issues are uncovered. A. On May 31, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Looks like jclouds-cli has a LICENSE.txt in its

Re: [CANCELLED] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating rc1

2013-05-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
Ok, I've pushed changes that'll deal with the issues I mentioned below. I'll wait another couple hours to see if anyone has any more feedback before cutting the next RC, but I'm canceling the vote on this RC for obvious reasons. =) A. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Andrew

[VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC2

2013-05-31 Thread Andrew Bayer
Hello, This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, the first jclouds release at Apache. The PPMC has approved the release at this point, so this is an IPMC vote. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12324412&s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC2

2013-06-01 Thread Andrew Bayer
an Cabrera wrote: > How many binding votes are there from the PPMC vote? > > > Regards, > Alan > > On May 31, 2013, at 4:13 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, >>

Re: Correct process for signing keys?

2013-06-02 Thread Andrew Bayer
Well, I've got the first three, and will bug coworkers in the GWOT to sign my key next week. =) A. On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I think that the RM _must_ have a key, that the key must be part of a > KEYS file in svn/git, and that it _should_ be uploaded into their >

Write permission to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2013?

2013-06-11 Thread Andrew Bayer
Hey all - Could I get write permission to the wiki, specifically for https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2013 and the like? Username is AndrewBayer. A.

[VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC3

2013-06-16 Thread Andrew Bayer
Hello, This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, the first jclouds release at Apache. This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC vote passed, with three +1s from mentors (David Nalley, Olivier Lamy, and Suresh Marru). It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/j

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC3

2013-06-17 Thread Andrew Bayer
; > -sebastien > > > On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> This is the third release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, >> the first jclouds release at Apache. >> >> This is the IPMC vote. The PPMC

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating, RC3

2013-06-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
The vote is now closed, and with 7 +1s, 4 of them IPMC, Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating RC3 will be released. Here are the votes: PPMC binding: - Andrew Bayer - Ignasi Barrera - Adrian Cole IPMC binding: - David Nalley - Olivier Lamy - Suresh Marru - Jim Jagielski Thanks, all! A. On Tue, Jun

[ANNOUNCE] Apache jclouds 1.6.1-incubating released

2013-06-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
The Apache jclouds (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of jclouds 1.6.1-incubating. This is the first Apache release of jclouds. Apache jclouds is a cloud agnostic library that enables developers to access a variety of supported cloud providers using one API. The source archives

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds-1.6.2-incubating RC1

2013-08-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Hey IPMC - Just a heads up that we are still looking for two IPMC votes on this release - if you've got a chance, please give it a look. Thanks. A. On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:03 PM, Andrew Phillips wrote: > Hi all > > This is the second release candidate for Apache jclouds 1.6.2-incubating, > t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache jclouds-1.6.2-incubating RC2

2013-08-27 Thread Andrew Bayer
Happy to share the script - it was particularly useful for us given the plethora of release artifacts, obviously. =) A. On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > + 1 (binding) > > JClouds PPMC, > > The release verification script is handy, should consider sharing it with > genera

[VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version 0.1.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 *** Please download, test, and vote by Wednesday, August 24 (3 working days fro

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
t of VMs at home and at work). > I am booting up right now a bunch of VMs to ensure next patch won't > break anything. > Could we re-cut a rc after that patch? > > > On 08/19/2011 11:25 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop,

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
I'm not sure if I'm supposed to explicitly vote, but just in case: +1 binding A. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Personally, I'm fine with releasing so long as CentOS5 and Ubuntu work - > anything else can be fixed/added in 0.2.0-incubating. > &

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
any inconsistencies with what's in SVN, let me know and I'll check it out. Adding DISCLAIMER now. A. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:48 PM, sebb wrote: > On 19 August 2011 19:25, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version > > 0.1

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as well. The .gitignore files - I'll open a bug to remove the top-level one from the tarball, but the ones that show up deeper are expected by the build process. A. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Which source files ar

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find RC1 at http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-1/. Website should update shortly. A. On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Oh, and I'm reformatting NOTICE now as w

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-21 Thread Andrew Bayer
p-dev/topics). > > This also needs to be fixed before release. > > Why is this not a .txt file? > > On 20 August 2011 03:08, sebb wrote: > > On 19 August 2011 23:14, Andrew Bayer wrote: > >> Ack, I screwed up and overwrote RC0 with RC1. In any case, please find

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-21 Thread Andrew Bayer
for now, excluded from the tarball. The webpage has been updated. The tarball has been built with GNU tar, rather than BSD tar. Let me know if there are any more issues. Thanks! A. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > The README is formatted for GitHub - will update t

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-21 Thread Andrew Bayer
Tag replaced. A. On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 5:26 PM, sebb wrote: > On 22 August 2011 00:49, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > New candidate up at > > http://people.apache.org/~abayer/bigtop-0.1.0-incubating-candidate-2/. > The > > only files RAT still sees missing license head

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
e) > when the vote succeeds. > > Failing that, please quote the revision number of the tag. > > Otherwise it's not possible to determine what was actually voted on. > > [BTW, the new tar file format reads OK in Winzip and Ant.] > > On 22 August 2011 01:56, Andrew

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
2011 at 8:56 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created - > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2 > > > > A. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
ect to include RC2 please. > > Thanks! > On 22 August 2011 16:26, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > Whoops. Sorry about that. New tag created - > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.1.0-incubating-RC2 > > > > A. > > > > On Mon, A

[VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version 0.1.0-incubating. It fixes the following issues: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12317549&styleName=Html&projectId=12311420 *** Please download, test, and vote by Thursday, August 24 (3 working days from

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
...and I should add that I'm, again, +1 binding. =) A. On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > This is the first incubator release for Apache Bigtop, version > 0.1.0-incubating. > > It fixes the following issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/R

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
blergh, sorry about the date and the DISCLAIMER text. Fixing the DISCLAIMER on trunk now. I've also done BIGTOP-26 on trunk. I'm honestly not sure about the filter files - will check on that going forward. A. On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:30 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22 August 2011 19:07,

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
urrently producing > package name without reference to bigtop. The resulting artifacts can > potentially overlap with project produced artifacts. > > regards, > Eric > > On Aug 22, 2011, at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > This is the first incubator release for Apach

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating

2011-08-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
> using maven for releasing. In case you are this might be useful: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/empiredb/Release+Process > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > Was actually doing that as you wrote this. =) > > > > A. > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-24 Thread Andrew Bayer
jira for next rel) > Natty doesn't install curl by default btw. > > Fix the status page and I'll change my vote (no need for new rc). > > Patrick > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > This is the first incubator release for

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.1.0-incubating RC2

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
The vote has passed, with 8 +1s from Bigtop PPMC members, a non-binding -1 from a non-PPMC/IPMC member, and 3 +1s from Incubator PMC members. +1 Andrew Bayer * -1 Eric Yang +1 Bruno Mahe * +1 Roman Shaposhnik * +1 Peter Linnell * +1 Doug Cutting + +1 Patrick Hunt *+ +1 Tom White *+ +1 Andre

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Bigtop 0.1.0-incubating is released!

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
ecision making process have stabilized in a manner consistent with other successful ASF projects. While incubation status is not necessarily a reflection of the completeness or stability of the code, it does indicate that the project has yet to be fully endorsed by the ASF. Thanks! Andrew Bayer

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Bigtop 0.1.0-incubating is released!

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
I fail at cut and paste - the Bigtop link should be http://incubator.apache.org/bigtop/. Which will have a download link as soon as mirrors update. A. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 9:51 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > Greetings, > > The Apache Bigtop team is pleased to announce the release o

Re: How to enable "Submit patch" for an incubating project?

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
Also, how do we get JIRA/SVN integration turned on, so that commits with JIRA ids in the comments will result in those JIRAs updating? A. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: shaposh...@gmail.com [mailto:shaposh...@gmail.com] On Beha

Re: How to enable "Submit patch" for an incubating project?

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
Gav. > > > > > > From: Andrew Bayer [mailto:andrew.ba...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, 26 August 2011 9:50 AM > To: general@incubator.apache.org; ga...@16degrees.com.au > Subject: Re: How to enable "Submit patch" for an incubating project? > > > > Also, ho

Re: How to enable "Submit patch" for an incubating project?

2011-08-25 Thread Andrew Bayer
Ah. I was expecting a comment. Sorry! A. On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:30:29PM -0700, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-43 and > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&re

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating

2011-11-03 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1. A. On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > > The tag to be voted on: > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bigtop/tags/release-0.2.0-incubating-RC1/ > > +1 > > Thanks, > Roman. >

Re: [VOTE] Release for Bigtop version 0.2.0-incubating RC2

2011-11-04 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 non-binding. A. On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > This takes care of Patrick's RAT concerns. From now on you can run RAT by: > $ mvn -Prelease install > at the top level of a project. This is THE only change between RC1 and RC2 > and given how cosmetic it is I'd like

Re: [VOTE] Release Flume version 1.1.0-incubating

2012-03-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
fwiw, I really think https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLUME-1032should be addressed before 1.1.0 is released. The binary artifact, while just a convenience artifact, is rather incorrect. A. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Ralph Goers wrote: > Just to be clear, although the version number d

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flume version 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

2012-03-20 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 - binary tarball looks right now. A. On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: > This is the second incubator release for Apache Flume, version > 1.1.0-incubating. We are now voting on release candidate rc1. > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > The li

A suggestion: podling post-mortems

2015-10-12 Thread Andrew Bayer
I'd like to make a suggestion - after a podling graduates or is terminated, the podling's mentors should be responsible for putting together a post mortem report, or an exit interview, or whatever you want to call it. This would cover the pain points in onboarding the podling, particular issues hit

A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
This is a legitimate question - by my very rough count, we've accepted 25-30 podlings into the Incubator in the last year, and other than the JavaX trainwreck, I'm having a hard time finding examples of potential podlings we've declined to incubate. Some of that is certainly because it's not easy t

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Forgot to add - and what criteria would make it acceptable to vote no? A. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > This is a legitimate question - by my very rough count, we've accepted > 25-30 podlings into the Incubator in the last year, and other than the > Ja

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
2015 at 9:59 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:46 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > ...Can we think of some examples in recent years of potential podlings > getting > > to the point of a serious DISCUSS thread but not making it to a vote?.. >

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Would it be reasonable to add a section to the proposal template covering infrastructural requirements/expectations? A. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > ...Is

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
es, things rarely go to a vote until the > outcome > > is already assured so looking for failed votes isn't very productive. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:22 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> > >>> On Oct 13, 2015, at 3:59 AM, B

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Thanks - just wanted to make sure. =) A. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:56 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Oct 13, 2015, at 10:32 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > > > But - and I wanna be very clear that this is a hypothetical - if I were > to > > still have signi

Re: A question: Is it alright to say no to potential podlings?

2015-10-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Where is that template kept? A. On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > ...Would it be reasonable to add a section to the proposal template > covering > > i

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-27 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 binding On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 binding > > > > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote: > > > Come to think of it a bit more, yes I am not satisfied with the outcome > of > > the CTR/RTC exchange in the project. > > > > Hence changing my v

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

2015-11-27 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 binding On Thursday, November 26, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think that forcing experienced community developers into one model or the > other is unnecessary. Let them in as they would like. > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Greg Stein > wrote: > > > -1 (binding) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

2016-09-16 Thread Andrew Bayer
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Geertjan Wielenga < geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: > - deadlock.netbeans.org: 6 VMs, used mainly for propagation of changes > between team repositories and to the releases repository, including jobs > for building community plugins (releases*-au) and jobs

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

2015-03-19 Thread Andrew Bayer
2) >> * jarjar (ALv2) >> * Checkstyle (LGPL) >> * Cobertura (GPL) >> * Gradle (ALv2) >> * Asciidoctor (MIT) >> * Simian (http://www.harukizaemon.com/simian/get_it_now.html) >> >> Test only dependencies: >> >> * Apach

Re: [GROOVY] mailing lists are ready, see you there!

2015-03-26 Thread Andrew Bayer
Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe moderation emails? A. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz < bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou > wrote: > > ...-subscribe@groovy.incubator.a.o ? > > of course yes, so

Re: [GROOVY] mailing lists are ready, see you there!

2015-03-26 Thread Andrew Bayer
Ok, I'll approve 'em. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > I don't. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Andrew Bayer > wrote: > > Just making sure - others besides me are getting the subscribe moderation > > emails? > > &g

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Parquet from the Incubator

2015-04-15 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 binding. A. On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Ryan Blue wrote: > Thanks for linking to the MR release thread, Jake! > > This is a good opportunity to remind people that the Parquet MR release > vote is on-going and could use a little attention, too. > > Thanks! > > rb > > > > On 04/14/2015 0

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Parquet MR (Incubating) 1.6.0 RC2

2015-04-15 Thread Andrew Bayer
+1 binding - checksums and signature pass, NOTICE, DISCLAIMER and LICENSE all look right, RAT passes. One minor quirk is that if you download https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/parquet/apache-parquet-mr-1.6.0-incubating-rc2/apache-parquet-mr-1.6.0-incubating.tar.gz.sha through Chrome,

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

2015-04-21 Thread Andrew Bayer
I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened before with the same person on a different ASF account. A pattern is forming. A. On Tuesday, April 21, 2015, Ted Dunning wrote: > Excellent answer. > > Thanks. > > > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Konstantin Boudnik > wrote

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

2015-04-21 Thread Andrew Bayer
Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so it's not a big logical leap. A. On Wednesday, April 22, 2015, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 22.04.2015 08:04, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > I have to express a concern here - this sort of thing has happened befor

Re: Apache Ignite twitter

2015-04-22 Thread Andrew Bayer
Regardless, this is the wrong venue for such discussions. I apologize and will bring my concerns up at the right list. A. On Apr 22, 2015 08:47, "Andrew Bayer" wrote: > Ok, that's true, but the same person has been involved in both cases, so > it's not a big l

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.4-incubating

2015-07-13 Thread Andrew Bayer
Argh, I forgot to vote over on the podling thread, so hey, I'll vote now! RAT check passed, signatures check out, tags check out, could build from source package. +1 binding, IPMC, mentor. A. On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Hi all! > > The Apache Groovy PPMC has suc