Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

Hi All, I just changed the git-wip address with a gitbox version, as I was told that new incubator projects will require to use gitbox. Chris Am 13.12.17, 01:41 schrieb "Mike Drob" : > Can’t enter incubation without having code. I think this has been done

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

Hi all, so as far as I can see and count, the vote passes with: +1 = 3 (Justin, John, Luciano) 0 = 0 -1 = 0 Thanks for your support :-) Chris Am 11.12.17, 13:30 schrieb "Luciano Resende" <luckbr1...@gmail.com>: +1 (binding) On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 1:39 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Accept PLC4X into the Apache Incubator

I would like to add my vote too: +1 (non Binding) Chris Outlook for Android herunterladen From: Justin Mclean Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 10:41:27 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

The mail subject is wrong. On 11 December 2017 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > The Apache Edgent community approved a vote to release > Apache Edgent 1.2.0-incubating from RC1. > > Per [1] we are requesting IPMC approval to

Re: [PROPOSAL] PLC4X - proposal for Apache Incubation

. Can’t enter incubation without having code. Can’t write apache-code publicly without being Apache ;-) Chris Am 11.12.17, 12:47 schrieb "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>: On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 6:46 AM Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

the LICENSE file and here’s the revision to vote on: 23497 Chris Am 11.12.17, 12:50 schrieb "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com>: On 11 December 2017 at 11:33, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Hi Seb, > > starting with Edgent 1.2.0 we have swi

[VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

The Apache Edgent community approved a vote to release Apache Edgent 1.2.0-incubating from RC1. Per [1] we are requesting IPMC approval to publish the release bundles on the distribution site [2]. This vote will be open for 72 hours - 1.2.0-incubating-RC1 vote results / thread [3] - Git hash

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

It should of course have been Edgent ;-) Am 11.12.17, 10:40 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>: The Apache Edgent community approved a vote to release Apache Edgent 1.2.0-incubating from RC1. Per [1] we are requesting IPMC approval to publish

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

Hi Henk, thanks for pointing that out … I renamed the files and adjusted the release scripts to make sure this is correct for future releases. Chris Am 11.12.17, 10:47 schrieb "Henk P. Penning" <penn...@uu.nl>: On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Dat

Re: Edit access to the incubator wiki

Oh gee … just noticed that it’s a completely separare user db … just created a new one: ChristoferDutz Chris Am 09.12.17, 19:18 schrieb "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>: What is your wiki username? On Dec 9, 2017 12:47 PM, "Christofer Dutz"

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

e following text: "Apache Edgent is currently undergoing Incubation at the Apache Software Foundation." That does not belong there. On 11 December 2017 at 12:02, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: > Hi Seb, > > we have sto

Re: Apache Policy Quiz

pache Foo 6 NOTICE of Apache-licensed code that was included from outside ASF Only 1,2,6 are correct. Here I left out "Other Apache Projects which code was reused" and "Code contributed in software grant" because those can be more complicated.

Manually created binary data in ASF repos?

Hi all, I have a little question regarding binary data in ASF repos. I know the policy that an ASF release should not have binary files in them. The problem I am having is that I’m currently writing integration-tests for PLC4X. Most of the protocols we are implementing there are binary

Re: Manually created binary data in ASF repos?

Aaahh great ... happy to hear that. Well then I'll definitely go the path of using these binary test-data files and as they will have the ending ".pcapng" I guess most people will immediately know what they are and we'll also point it out in the readme or where it fits best. Chris Am

Incubation disclaimer in German?

Hi, I am currently finishing some magazine articles about Apache PLC4X and Apache Edgent and therefore sent Sally my documents fort he official „ok“ … I should add the incubation disclaimer to my articles. As these are German articles, I didn’t want to add the official English version, so I

Re: Incubation disclaimer in German?

die volle Unterstützung der ASF verdienen muss. Chris Am 15.02.18, 12:39 schrieb "Greg Stein" <gst...@gmail.com>: On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jochen.wiedm...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2018-02-14 14:15 GMT+01:00 Christofer Dutz &

Request to join the IPMC

Hi all, I would like to ask to join the IPMC as I would like to help mentoring a new project coming towards the incubator. Chris

Incubator Logo for dark background?

Hi all, I am currently working on a new skin for our PLC4X website. As I want to put the incubator logo in the title bar and this bar is quite dark, I would like to take the normal logo and invert the color of the text to being white. Am I allowed to simply do that myself or would this have to

Re: [DISCUSS] IoTDB Incubation Proposal

I too would like to help by being one of your mentors. After all hearing about your project coming, was what made me sign up as ipmc. Chris Outlook for Android herunterladen From: Willem Jiang Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 6:51:03 AM

Re: [Vote] call a vote for IoTDB incubation proposal

Tian Jiang（jiangtia18 at mails dot tsinghua dot edu dot cn） > > Shuo Zhang (zhangshuo at k2data dot com dot cn) > > Lei Rui (rl18 at mails dot tsinghua dot edu dot cn) > > Rui Liu (liur17 at mails dot tsinghua dot edu

Restarting an IPMC?

Hi all, as it seems and as I have reported in the last podling report, the Apache Edgent project had been suffering of one of the things that happen if you don’t have a diverse committer base. After IBM pulling out the Edgent contributors we are left effectively with only me. After mentioning

Re: Restarting an IPMC?

it Edgent and would have to change the package and artifact names ... Chris Am 06.11.18, 09:27 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" : Hi Chris, On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > ... 2. Is it possible to sort of reset a podling IPMC and star

Re: Restarting an IPMC?

Well I guess then I'll simply step up as third mentor on Edgent. Do I formally have to do anything for this? Chris Am 06.11.18, 09:26 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, Good to see that the honest (stark even) podling report got several people expressing interest in the project.

Re: Restarting an IPMC?

UPS ... didn't mean the (I)PCM , but the (P)PMC ... Am 06.11.18, 09:18 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, as it seems and as I have reported in the last podling report, the Apache Edgent project had been suffering of one of the things that happen if you don’t have

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 [RC2]

+1 (binding) Same here but also upgrading it to a binding vote. Chris Am 02.10.18, 07:23 schrieb "Stefan Bodewig" : On 2018-09-26, Christofer Dutz wrote: > This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.1.0. just copying over my bi

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 [RC2]

ANNOUNCE. Christofer Dutz Apache PLC4X

[VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 [RC2]

Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.1.0. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.1.0. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 [RC2]

Done ... I maually removed the MD5 in SVN and removed it from the build and the instructions to add it. Chris Am 26.09.18, 13:23 schrieb "Henk P. Penning" : On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:12:43 +0200 > From:

Re: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

Hi Julian, For me it always felt like crunch can't directly be compared to the other "streaming engines" as I see it as a bundle of a streaming engine and a higher level framework for doing typical industry operations on top of that. I think the higher level library should actually be able to

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 [RC1]

Asif Siddiqui" : +1 (non-binding) Checks Done : - incubating in name - hashes and signatures is good - DISCLAIMER/NOTICE/LICENSE exists - checked for archive matching git tag Regards Asif On 2018/11/23 17:00:53, Christofer D

[VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 [RC1]

Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.2.0. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.2.0. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.

AW: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.2.0 [RC1]

+1 (binding) (Carrying over my vote from the plc4x list) Chris Am 24.11.18, 10:30 schrieb "Stefan Bodewig" : On 2018-11-23, Christofer Dutz wrote: > This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.2.0. > The Apache PLC4X com

Re: Using GPLv3 in the build?

n that category, but to be sure, present this as a legal-discuss@a.o > inquiry with a corresponding Jira to have a binding conclusion. > > On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 10:04 Christofer Dutz > > Ok ... so that was quick, > > > > I looked up the guy doing most of the c

Using GPLv3 in the build?

Hi all, I just double checked the text on the GPLv3 compatibility. Stupid thing is the problem I’m having isn’t really covered by that [1]. The case I’m currently having is that there is a toolset called Kaitai [2], which sounds interesting for the Apache PLC4X project. In general you define a

Re: Using GPLv3 in the build?

elopers and ask them. Cheers, -- Richard > On 9. Jan 2019, at 15:53, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just double checked the text on the GPLv3 compatibility. > Stupid thing is the problem I’m having isn’t really covered by that [1

[DISCUSS] Graduate Apache PLC4X (incubating) as a TLP

Apache PLC4X Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache PLC4X Project: * Christofer Dutzmailto:cd...@apache.org>> * Julian Feinauermailto:jfeina...@apache.org>> * Justin Mclea

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache PLC4X (incubating) as a TLP

t 2018 report) did not continue while the other did. Graduating with only 6 PMC is pretty narrow. Are there other developers active who look like you will want to add to the committer / PMC soon after graduation? Best Regards, Dave > On Apr 4, 2019, at 6:59 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: &

Vote started on graduation of Apache PLC4X (incubating) pooling to TLP on d...@plc4x.apache.org

Hi all, I just wanted to inform you all, that on our dev-list we have just started a VOTE thread for proposing Apache PLC4X (incubating) for graduation to TLP. Here’s a link to the vote thread:

Re: the case of the maven wrapper

So now the files in the maven-wrapper have all the correct headers? So all I need to do is replace the versions in the Apache repos with that version and add something to the Notice and/or license and we're all good? I knew that binary files can't be checked in, therefore I wrote that pr that

Re: Binary jars in the source release which are only for testing

If you are taking about the Maven wrapper. I did that for you guys. A PR I submitted a year or two ago does exactly this. It checks if the jar is there, if not it tries to download via wget and similar, if that falls it comes that little Java program (the one that started this whole discussion)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

lan to fix it in the next release. Other comments inline. On 2/22/19 3:45 PM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I have started verifying this release ... however this is the first time I am validating a project I'm not directly involved in. > So I foun

Re: Incubator release votes

Hmmm ... this is really odd ... On the one side we have lengthy discussions about non-mentors from resisting to interfere, but on the other hand podlings are begging for such "interference". Guess there are always two sides of the discussion. And I have to admit that for a short time I was

Re: Starting at the incubator and releases

Or/and the existing mentors could concentrate more on helping the podling they handle to become a TLP and not stay in the incubator for too long. Even if that sometimes requires becoming more a PITA to the podlings that are sort of living in the incubator forever ... And in the end we should

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

I'll check that out after coming home from my party trip to Utrecht ;-) If this is required to build, I think it should be mentioned in the readme. Chris Outlook für Android herunterladen From: Craig Russell Sent: Saturday, February 23,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.3.0-rc1

Hi all, I have started verifying this release ... however this is the first time I am validating a project I'm not directly involved in. So I found some things that are different than with the other projects (Not sure if this is bad or good though) So here goes: 1) No KEYS file (Think this

Differences in voting rules between Apache Maturity Model and Incubator Default Project Guidelines

Hi all, we’re currently working on some pre-graduation work and stumbled over something: In the Apache Maturity Model [1] is says that: CS40 - In Apache projects, vetoes are only valid for code commits and are justified by a technical explanation, as per the Apache voting rules defined in

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

Sign me up ( Am 08.02.19, 11:55 schrieb "Lars Francke" : One more thing: We've got three mentors. If anyone else would like to volunteer we won't say no :) I've used the E-Mail addresses from your mails in the proposal. Feel free to update to an @apache.org address if you

Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

Hi all, I just wanted to ask, if it is ok that my company produces a rollup display for the Apache PLC4X (incubating) podling and we use that at conferences like the “Building IoT”, where we are sponsor and I’m talking on PLC4X. Here some links to options our designer did.

Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences?

_ From: Bertrand Delacretaz Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2019 4:39:20 PM To: Incubator General Subject: Re: Permission to print a PLC4X stand for being displayed at conferences? Hi Chris, On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 6:23 AM Christofer Dutz wrote: > ...I just wanted to ask, if it is ok that my company

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) Chris Am 13.02.19, 08:58 schrieb "Lars Francke" : Hi everyone, we've discussed the proposal for the Training project in [1] and [2]. The proposal itself can be found on the wiki[3]. According to the Incubator rules[4] I'd like to call a vote to accept the

Re: the case of the maven wrapper

Am 14.02.19, 07:19 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Does it help, that I wrote that file and submitted it in a pull request to eliminate the binary jar needed prior to my change? ... Guess that's also an additional reason why there's an Apache header on it :-) Outlook für And

Re: the case of the maven wrapper

Does it help, that I wrote that file and submitted it in a pull request to eliminate the binary jar needed prior to my change? ... Guess that's also an additional reason why there's an Apache header on it :-) Outlook für Android herunterladen

Re: the case of the maven wrapper

Yeah well ... But in the end ... if we actually do include code by takari isn't if fair to mention it? After all it's not just the Java code the wrapper scripts themselves should count too. And in the end it's a one-time addition that will stick there for the rest of time. So give it 5 minutes

Re: Suitable project name search (was: [PROPOSAL] New blockchain project: Cava)

And building awareness, reputation and community around something is quite a lot of work. So If you start a new podling and work hard on promoting it, it would be a shame having to rename that and effectively loose all promotional results you might have had. I would also strongly suggest to do

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]

Also carrying over my +1 vote from the list. Chris Am 31.01.19, 12:24 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.0. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release

Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal

Hi all, finally having some time to read through the proposal, I too would be interested in participating. I do have quite a bit of experience in creating trainings as this is part of my job at codecentric. For the ASF I have for example prepared a Maven training, which I held in Vancouver a

[RESULT] [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache PLC4X graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

Hi all, The vote passes with: 6 +1 Votes 0 -1 Votes I'll add the resolution to the board meeting agenda for the meeting on 17.04.2019. Thanks for your support, Chris Am 10.04.19, 04:47 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Justin just pointed out that the section:

[VOTE] Recommend 'Apache PLC4X graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

votes: Christofer Dutz, Tim Mitsch, Julian Feinauer, Greg Trasuk, Sebastian Rühl, Justin Mclean, Markus Sommer, Stefan Bodewig 1 non-binding +1 vote: Andreas Oswald No 0 or -1. Since entering the Incubator in 2017, the Apache PLC4X community has: * sent 1.908 emails by 57 participants

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache PLC4X (incubating) as a TLP

Hi all, as there seem to be no objections, I'll start the VOTE. Thanks, Chris On 2019/04/04 13:59:15, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > Since Apache PLC4X (incubating) entered the incubator in December 2017 we > have attracted quite a number of new PPMCs, > committers a

Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache PLC4X graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

over into the final resolution. Chris On 2019/04/09 08:08:45, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hello, > > The Apache PLC4X podling community has successfully[0] voted[1] to > graduate to a top-level project (Even seem to have mis-counted the +1 votes). > Accordingly, I'm bringing th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]

Hi all, carrying over my vote from the plc4x dev list. +1 Chris Am 08.03.19, 13:02 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to

Re: late learnings, which could be helpful for all mentors to know

How about this as compromise? If the mentors on the project list have voted +1, then the vote can be continued in parallel? Shouldn't this help reduce both the time votes take but not waste the limited IPMC bandwidth? Regarding releasing of all repos ... how about this: Instead of having to

Re: Incubation Pain Points

till isn’t). Gj On Mon, 17 Jun 2019 at 10:24, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi Geertjan, > > not quite sure how to read this ... what are you referring to as "new > culture". > The existing project coming to the

Re: Move the Zipkin repos back, as the community has voted to leave.

But if you are releasing Maven artifacts, I would assume that you change the group-ids to not start with "org.apache" and the packages should probably be changed too. But not 100% sure if this is just a nice-to-have or a hard requirement. And also I didn't check the coordinates or package

Re: Incubation Pain Points

Hi Geertjan, not quite sure how to read this ... what are you referring to as "new culture". The existing project coming to the ASF? And this project should adopt the tradition of the ASF. Or that the ASF should adopt the culture and tradition of the project joining? (Probably then meant more

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

I agree, I think that the "requirement" (Never really knew there was such a requirement) of being a Member sort of gives you the easy entry path as if you are a member people expect you to understand the Apache Way. However that doesn't mean that people not being a member don't get the Apache

New IoT related exchange mailinglist

Hi all, as I know there’s a lot of IoT stuff going on in the incubator, I would like to advertise a new mailing list we recently created. i...@apache.org It’s a mailing list intended to help increase the communication between the projects in the IoT area. It would be

Re: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal

e Git for source code management and enable Github mirroring functionality. > > As we plan to merge some of the repos described above to simplify the release process we ask to create the following source repositories: > * streampipes (containing backend + UI) > * strea

Re: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal

ds JB On 02/11/2019 17:39, Christofer Dutz wrote: > Hi all, > > I added him to the list. > > Chris > > Am 02.11.19, 11:53 schrieb "Dominik Riemer" : > > Yes, it w

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

stalled at runtime: pipeline elements and connect adapters) * streampipes-website (containing docs + website) ** Issue tracking ** JIRA ID: StreamPipes === Initial Committers === List of initial committers in alphabetical order: * Christofer

AW: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

mitters === List of initial committers in alphabetical order: * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) * Dominik Riemer (dominik dot riemer at gmail dot com) * Johannes Tex (tex at fzi dot de) * Patrick Wiener (wiener at fzi dot de) * Philipp Zehnder (z

AW: Write Access to Incubator Wiki

in finding new committers. As the core development team has >>>> already worked on StreamPipes for the past few years and is fully >>>> committed to the software and its benefit for the industrial IoT >>>> domain, we would also continue development without bei

Re: Write Access to Incubator Wiki

reampipes.incubator.apache.org> > > * comm...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org comm...@streampipes.incubator.apache.org> > > As StreamPipes is targeted to a non-technical audience, we see a dedicated > user mailing list as an important requireme

Re: Donation of subproject for PLC4X

Hi all, We have that on our radar and that's why we're discussion naming options. We're not planning or ever had planned naming it "Crunch". Chris Am 07.10.19, 10:57 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" : On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 10:52 AM Lars Francke wrote: > ...while a name search is not

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

Hi all, how about just adding the maven-wrapper itself ... the maven plugin isn't even needed. I have been using the maven-wrapper in almost every project, however the plugin I have never. It's just a little tool to add the cmd, sh files as well as some properties. I think we could even just

Re: [RESULT] [IP CLEARANCE] Maven Wrapper

Great ... :-) really looking forward to finally having this resolved AND the maven-wrapper itself as part of the Maven project. Guess after releasing that as apache once and updating the maven-wrapper scripts accordingly we can finally get rid of some of the controversial bits in our releases.

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Clear? Regards, Dave > On Apr 8, 2020, at 6:05 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Justin, > > I agree that they should ... especially if you don't build from source or use the pre-compiled binaries you otherwise wouldn't have any reference to

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

, Dave > On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:07 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > unfortunately I can't see the requirement to have a DISCLAIMER in there ... nor could I find it ... I totally agree with you, that it should be that way, but I could

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too? > On Apr 9, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Christofer Dutz > wrote: > > Yhhh ... buuut. > > We're talking about convenience binaries here ... as we keep on insisting > that only source bundles are releases. > So technically the

Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Hi all, currently validating a podlings release and I stumbled over the following fact: * The src and bin bundles contain a DISCLAIMER * All of their project-jars in any of the bin bundles and the jars in Apache’s Nexus don’t have one Is this considered OK or should they all have a

Re: Do Pooling jars have to contain the DISCLAIMER too?

Hi Justin, I agree that they should ... especially if you don't build from source or use the pre-compiled binaries you otherwise wouldn't have any reference to the software undergoing incubation at the ASF. Was sort of just asking if it's a "should" (still a +1 with a notice to fix for next

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

the included passera and UniquenessCache.scala code [OK] Rat doesn't report any surprizes [OK] Running the build and the tests according to documentation in the README (No test failures this time) Also the DISCLAIMERS are now in place in the jars Great job :-) Am 22.04.20, 19:32 schrieb "Chris

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.6.0-rc2

Sorry for not being that responsive, I'm currently trying to finish something that's consuming a lot of time for me ... hopefully I'll be finished soon and can do the review. Chris Am 22.04.20, 15:59 schrieb "Olabusayo Kilo" : Thank you to the IPMC members who voted, we're still in need

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

Apache IoTDB Project: * Chen Wang * Christofer Dutz * Dawei Liu * Gaofei Cao * Haonan Hou * Jialin Qiao * Jianmin Wang * Jincheng Sun * Jinrui Zhang * Julian Feinauer * Jun Yuan * Justin Mclean * Kevin A. McGrail * Kun Liu * Lei Rui

[VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

Hi, The vote to release Apache Training (incubating) Tools 1.0.0 has passed with 3 +1 (all from mentors) and one non-binding +1 vote. Binding votes (all were IPMC members): - Christofer Dutz (https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rd2cbadaf3b8c050e927f7ec5078d9b783eeaa234026542131e01477e%40

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

Hi all, TL/DR: +1 binding Longer version: I started evaluating. As usual the IoTDB release candidate is in very good shape. Here some super minor things I noticed: - It seems the ".plan" templates in server/src/assembly/resources/tools/logVisualize/plans support comments, then they should

[DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

I wouldn't say they have to be there ... but I personally do like projects that have them there: A README as well as a RELEASE_NOTES. Chris Am 19.08.20, 16:17 schrieb "Xiangdong Huang" : Hi, > I just have a quick question about the README files. Why do we put them

[NOTICE] The Apache Training (incubating) pooling has just finished a vote to turn on the commit bit for all apache committers ...

Hi all, the Apache Training podling has just passed a vote to turn on the commit bit for it’s code repos to allow all Apache Committers to commit. We hope this will revive the podling as we see potential for great benefit for all Apache projects. Filing an Infra-Issue for actually flicking the

Apache Training (incubating) granted all Apache committers commit rights

Hi, We, the Apache Training PPMC, would like to tell you about an important update by which you can promote & train people on your Apache project: We're opening up commit access to all Apache committers. We at Apache build all sorts of great software. Some people even create training projects

[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Training (Incubating) Tools 1.0.0 RC2

> Hi, > > +1! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 7:49 PM Brahma Reddy Battula > wrote: > > > My late +1 (non-binding) > > > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:01 PM Christofer Dutz

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

+1 (binding) I did find some minor issues though, please see below. I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually have a look at this in order to see what to expect of the new release. Chris [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the

Re: [RELEASENOTES?] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 2.7.0-rc2

gt; On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:43 AM, Christofer Dutz wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > I did find some minor issues though, please see below. > I would really suggest to start maintaining a RELEASE_NOTES file. I usually have a look at this in order to see what

AW: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi and welcome on this new communication channel. I'd like to add, that I really liked how the project approached me and how they reacted when I told them the old project name Rheem would probably not go down well and that I would suggest changing the name. I gave them some tips what things

AW: [DISCUSS] Wayang Proposal

Hi Bernd, I just didn't want to leave the impression, that "we're full". So if anyone here would be interested in joining, he/she is more than welcome. I know that 3 is enough, but I also have seen that when starting with 3 initial mentors, usually 1 or 2 get lost some time after the

[VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

Chile (PUCV) ** Wenceslao Palma-Muñoz === Sponsors === ** Champion ** * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) ** Mentors ** . (cdutz) Christofer Dutz . (larsgeorge) Lars George . (berndf) Fondermann . (jbonofre) Jean-Baptiste Onofré ** Spon

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1

+1 (binding) Tested on my Mac using java 13 using SBT 1.3.4 [OK] Download all staged artifacts under the url specified in the release vote email into a directory we’ll now call download-dir. [OK] Verify the signature is correct: Additional Apache tutorial on how to verify downloads can be

[RESULT] [VOTE] Accept Wayang into the Apache Incubator

> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > > > > > On 11 Dec 2020 Fri at 20:04 Daniel B. Widdis &g

Re: Champion and Mentors wanted for new potential Apache SST incubator project

e new SST incubator > project proposal; see below. > So far I contacted Justin Mclean and Christofer Dutz and they are > considering to become mentors. > > Best Regards > Lothar > > > === Abstract === > > SST (Semantic STEP Technology) is an optimized RD

AW: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the project Chris -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alexander Alten-Lorenz Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2021 22:51 An: general@incubator.apache.org Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project +1 non-binding. Apache

AW: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Daffodil to a top-level project

ce to serve at the > direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the Apache > Daffodil Project, and to have primary responsibility for management of > the projects within the scope of responsibility of the Apache Daffodil > Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that t

  1   2   >