Re: [VOTE] Accept DataFu into the Incubator

whenever a new patch is submitted. This can be added after project creation. Initial Committers Matthew Hayes William Vaughan Evion Kim Sam Shah Xiangrui Meng Christopher Lloyd Mathieu Bastian Mitul Tiwari Josh Wills Jarek Jarcec Cecho

Re: Change of IPMC Chair

Congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 06:11:42PM -0800, Henry Saputra wrote: Congrats Roman! On Monday, February 3, 2014, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Greetings, Congratulations to Roman Shaposhnik! The Incubator PMC has voted to recommend Roman

Re: [VOTE] Accept Parquet into the incubator

[ X ] +1 Accept Parquet into the Incubator (non-binding) Jarcec On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 02:15:15PM -0700, Chris Aniszczyk wrote: Based on the results of the discussion thread:

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** Dev list vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc The

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. *** Please cast your vote by 2012-02-14 *** Dev list vote thread: http://markmail.org/message/alpqeqwliq4xbbcc The

[VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list (Oliver Lamy) and we're looking for additional two. I'm resending this email again without original RE: prefix in subject to stress that this is new vote. Thanks, Jarcec

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

Thank you for your feedback sir. If it's not an blocker, we will fix that in next release. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:41:00AM +, sebb wrote: On 10 February 2012 19:27, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version

Re: [VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who participated! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: This is the second incubator release for Apache Sqoop, version 1.4.1-incubating. We already have one IPMC vote on dev list

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

with the release process. Jarcec On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:33:03PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: I'm closing this vote. I'll sent results shortly. Thanks to everyone who participated! Jarcec On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:38:16PM +0100, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote: This is the second

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

-0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: The vote now passes with 3 +1 binding votes (including 1 from dev list vote): Tom White Patrick Hunt Olivier Lamy (dev list vote) Thanks for everyone who has reviewed

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Sqoop version 1.4.1-incubating

: Hi! On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: Hi Roman, we're definitely open to embrace any Apache policy for naming files. Can you point me to some written docs? AFAIK, it would be fair to say that Apache, in general, is all about source releases

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache Incubator

+1 Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 01:00:57AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop from Apache

+1. Jarcec On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 09:22:01AM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: The Apache Sqoop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we have added three new committers from diverse organizations and added two new PPMC members. The codebase of our product has steadily grown and

'' Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

[ X ] +1 Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator (Non-binding) Jarcec On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:34:09PM -0800, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator. Sqoop entered Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added three new

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

Hi Alex and Alan, we already moved entire logic to org.apache namespace. We're keeping classes in com.cloudera in place only for compatibility with tools that are based on sqoop (for example various connectors). However those classes do not contain any logic, they are just inheriting from

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator

[ X ] +1 Graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator Jarcec On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 01:17:57AM -0700, Arvind Prabhakar wrote: This is a call for vote to graduate Flume podling from Apache Incubator. Flume entered the Incubator in June of 2011. Since then it has added nine new committers

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

I also like the idea of moving podling name to domain name. However I'm pretty indifferent between $podling.incubator.a.o and $podling.a.o, so I'm +1 on both (just contributor opinion). Jarcec On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:24:10AM -0700, Luciano Resende wrote: On Friday, October 12, 2012, Jukka

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Roman Shaposhnik to the Apache Incubator PMC

Wow, congratulations Roman! Jarcec On Oct 19, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com wrote: Welcome! On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote: Hey Folks, The Apache Incubator PMC has VOTEd to add Roman Shaposhnik

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

I've been participating in three different projects that were moving from SVN to git (flume, sqoop, mrunit) and we did not experienced any issues with that process. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 12:09:43PM -0700, Craig L Russell wrote: On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Christian Grobmeier

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

with git except using it (referencing to Craigs mail). Now... how did you do the history transition from svn to git? Cheers On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 8:24 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.org wrote: I've been participating in three different projects that were moving from

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Mayhem proposal

I'm sorry, I probably miss understood the intention here. Jarcec On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 11:21:22PM +0100, Christian Grobmeier wrote: On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho jar...@apache.orgwrote: As was written - the repository was moved in direction SVN - GIT using git-svn

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ivory - Hadoop data management and processing platform

Hi Srikanth, I've read the proposal and documentation available on Github and the project seems very interesting to me. I'm currently mainly focusing on Apache Sqoop [1] and I can see a lot of opportunities for integration. I'll be more than happy to help with Ivory going forward. In case that

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.5.1 (rc0)

+1 binding * Signature and checksums are correct * Name correctly contains “-incubating” suffix * Verified top level files (LICENSE, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE) * I was not able to compile the archive with maven 3.0.5, I was getting dependency issues with some pentaho library. The issue goes away with

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry incubating version 1.6.0 (rc0)

+1 * Signature and checksums fits * Verified top level files (LICENSE, DISCLAMER, …) * Project compiles * Apache Rat is happy with licenses Jarcec > On Sep 15, 2015, at 11:27 PM, Sun, Dapeng wrote: > > Hi IPMC, > > > > This is the incubator release of Apache Sentry,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Impala into the Apache Incubator

[X] +1, accept Impala into the Incubator (Binding) Jarcec > On Nov 24, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Henry Robinson wrote: > > Hi - > > The [DISCUSS] thread has been quiet for a few days, so I think there's been > sufficient opportunity for discussion around our proposal to bring

Re: [VOTE] Accept Kudu into the Apache Incubator

uch > that our historical commit messages and code comments continue to reference > the appropriate bug numbers. > > == Initial Committers == > > * Adar Dembo a...@cloudera.com > * Alex Feinberg a...@strlen.net > * Andrew

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry

al members of the >> Apache Sentry Project: >> >> * Ali Rizvi <a...@apache.org> >> >> * Anne Yu <ann...@apache.org> >> >> * Arun Suresh <asur...@apache.org> >> >> * Brock Noland <br...@apache.org> >>

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sentry from the Incubator

+1 Binding. Jarcec > On Feb 16, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > > Justin, > > Yes, for the release 1.5.0 - voting was restarted on the general > list[1]. We later on did releases 1.5.1 (to fix some issues in 1.5.0) > and 1.6.0. > > [1]: >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Gearpump into the Apache Incubator

mmitters === > * Xiang Zhong > > * Tianlun Zhang > > * Qian Xu > > * Huafeng Wang > > * Kam Kasravi > > * Weihua Jiang > > * Tomasz Targonski > > * Karol Brejna > > * Gang Wang > > * Mark Chmarny > > * Xinglang Wang

Re: [VOTE] Accept Spot into the Apache Incubator

BSD > * D3js: BSD > * Nfdump: BSD > * Wireshark: GNU General Public License version 2 > * Apache Hadoop: Apache License 2.0 > * Apache Spark: Apache License 2.0 > * JQuery: MIT > * ReactJS: BSD > * Bootstrap: MIT > > Issues related to GPL dependencies will be resol