?
In my opinion it should not be a problem, but I can see the danger of
bending the rules.
Rgds
jan I.
FWIW: I am of the same opinion.
>
Documents are source code written in a natural language :-)
IMO yes.
Bear in mind documents are often the first thing a person sees, when
looking for technology, therefore its important that they are correct.
rgds
jan I.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
termination there's no code
> left.
> > With retirement code is still available. Am I correct?
>
> that's too complicated, I would scratch it ;-)
>
> How many podlings retire per year? Like one or two maybe - keep it simple.
>
+1. and dont forget its projects leavi
On Aug 12, 2014 7:26 PM, "Suresh Srinivas" wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
+1
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Byung-Gon Chun wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for participating in the proposal discussion on REEF. The
discussion
> > has calmed. I would like to call a vote for acceptance of REEF into
to new projects (with help from all you highly skilled
people).
I have been working with computers since 1975, and have, especially during
the days of BBS (anybody remember that...dial up with modem, and share),
helped establish development communities.
Enough about me, let my work show who
and will also give talks at ACEU.
Now I have a good reason to dive into all the guides and other documents,
so please bear over with me, when I mail questions/suggestions in the near
future.
Thanks peter and louis for putting trust in me.
rgds
jan I.
On 15 August 2014 09:05, Peter Kelly
know the project, correctly
dont vote, but at least the mentors of the project should vote without the
need to be reminded.
Could it be that the base problem here, is not the vote, but the mentor
activity and that the project
On 20 August 2014 07:56, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 11:02 PM, P. Taylor Goetz
> wrote:
> > ...Please vote to indicate if Apache Storm is ready to graduate. The
> proposed board resolution is included below....
>
> +1
>
+
people that move things so I dont expect
every PMC to be involved in everything every day. One of the reasons why we
vote for a release is to have a synchronization point (point of no return),
where the whole PMC must (should) care.
rgds
jan i
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1 https:/
e, and let the grantor do a
scrubbed release.
I can painfully confirm, that many grantor dont like public scrubbing or
for that matter being publicly told that they have license problems, that
is something best kept off-public.
rgds
jan i
>
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
>
> On 8/21/14
On 22 August 2014 22:16, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 8/22/14 12:59 PM, "jan i" wrote:
> >
> >In my opinion you did the right thing, but I could not find the process
> >you
> >ran through documented.
> >
> >I would have liked to see a txt
look ok from a license perspective (it is a bit confusing though
that src is nearly empty).
I am not a java person, so I have not built it, I leave that fun to more
skilled persons.
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
> Julian Hyde
> August 22, 2014 at 0:34
> Hi all,
>
> The Optiq
report
I am not so sure if its worth while with the board report.
rgds
jan i
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Aug 23, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
> > Sorry https://github.com/chrismattmann/apachestuff
&
vn and want git, so we might
end up with split data.
But I do agree with your POW, and would like to more automated processes.
rgds
jan i.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
sion to me (I thought
we in TAC was the only the used it).
I thought you would start with the single incubator project reports,
because the board report can to a large extent be generated from those ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> I'm writing some tooling for editing and report generating in:
>
On 24 August 2014 22:00, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>
> On Aug 24, 2014, at 12:54 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 24 August 2014 21:47, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> >> Here's a first sketch of a YAML based incubator report
> >>
> >> https://wiki.apach
On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote:
> This vote passes with 6 +1s and no 0 or -1 votes:
> +1 Alan Gates (mentor)
> +1 Jan Inversion
>
I wonder who that is ?
Politely said, I am amazed how many ways my name can be spelled.
rgds
jan Iversen.
> +1 John D. Ament
> +1 Justin Mclean
> +1 S
On 25 August 2014 20:17, Julian Hyde wrote:
> A few issues were raised during the vote for Apache Optiq 0.9.0
> (incubating) [0]. I started a separate thread to avoid muddying the vote. I
> address them below.
>
thanks, see my comments below.
>
> On Aug 23, 2014, at 10:3
On 25 August 2014 20:21, Julian Hyde wrote:
> On Aug 25, 2014, at 11:07 AM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 25 August 2014 19:25, Julian Hyde wrote:
> >
> >> +1 Jan Inversion
> >>
> > I wonder who that is ?
> >
> > Politely said, I am amazed
gt; of the report. If we have somebody who hasn't showed up for a 3 straight
> month -- that's when IPMC would try to intervene.
>
hmmm "try to intervene" sound a bit hard. After 3 month, I would prefer,
mailing the mentor in question, with a reminder of the duties, and ta
eparation for IP Clearance
> 2) removed PSD files with the grantor's permission based on concerns from
> Jan I
> 3) replaced four icons with blacked out versions provided by the grantor
>
> The grantor claims ownership/authorship of the other 3 icons pointed out
he last ones as well and respun both votes.
+0 (binding) with a clear signal, solve the above and you get a +1 fast.
rgds
jan i
med with the RC designation are the actual release
> files, i.e. the tar.gz, zip, md5 and asc files. Inside the release files
> everything has the final release version number. That's by-design so we can
> just rename the files when the vote passes.
>
Thats a good design.
You have also answered my questions in the other thread.
+1 for the 1.0 release.
rgds
jan i
>
> - Dave
>
se vote now to release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating).
>
+1 (binding), the project have responded quickly and effecively to all
concerns raised, I am impressed !.
rgds
jan i
>
>
> The Usergrid dev list vote thread:
>
> https://mail-archive
o agree with your POW. Important is:
- The release bits are in SVN
- The PMC vote is based on the same location presented for IPMC vote.
dist.a.o is for approved releases, and I have found no "rule" stating a
mandatory location to use for the vote itself.
rgds
jan i.
>
> To date, w
On 7 September 2014 21:48, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 3:39 PM, jan i wrote:
>
> > On 7 September 2014 21:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> >
> > > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put
> > something
> > > on dis
ev/xyz
as an elegant way of doing it, let me put it differently if a project
prefer to it differently it might not be elegant enough (or well
documented).
I think we really need to be careful not to make rules just because we can.
Giving projects freedom where possible should be our goal.
just m
imum time to closure of 72 hours.
>
Hmmm it cant be that simple, if a vote does not expire a IPMC can vote -1
after a month, and invalidate a release that got the needed 3 +1.
While I agree with you in principle, But I also assume that a -1 must be
given withi
hem) comes along. Getting new code
without people that understand it deeply, is really asking for trouble.
rgds
jan I.
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
y, start strict, and loosen up where really needed as
the project get more mature.
just my 2ct
jan I.
>
>
>
> On Friday, 26 September 2014, Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > As the primary author of the CouchDB bylaws, I will weigh in here.
> >
> > Agree with Ross
nd, which would allow you
to email a polite reminder and avoid this situation.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Original message From: Bertrand
> Delacretaz Date:09/25/2014 10:03 AM
> (GMT-05:00) To: Incubator General
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap Data 1.0.1 incubating
&
cos
> > as Champion, and stack, rvs, cos, hsaputra and brane volunteering to be
> Mentors.
> >
> > Please cast your vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1, bring Iginite into Incubator
> > [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> > [ ] -1, do not bring Iginit
On 28 September 2014 15:24, sebb wrote:
> On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote:
> > On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >
> >> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion
> >> (that has been formed over the years of
sal is available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LensProposal
>
> Vote is open till Oct 09, 2014 4 PM PST.
>
> [ ] +1 accept Lens in the Incubator
> [ ] +/-0
> [ ] -1 because...
>
> Only Votes from Incubator PMC members are binding, but all are welcome to
> expres
live in southern spain (I am danish) so TZ fits nicely.
I volunteer to champion for you, if the project want it, but suggest we
exchange some mails offlist to checkout your wishes and my possibilities.
rgds
jan I.
On 7 October 2014 10:59, Harald Kraemer
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have bee
g.
in the hope the PMC will go for quality and voluntary respin the release.
rgds
jan i
On 7 October 2014 07:09, Steven Phillips wrote:
> In case there is any confusion, the first email sent out in this thread had
> the wrong vote count. The second one has the correct count:
>
> +9 bi
d a concern and did not block the
release.
>
> Regards,
> aditya...
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Ted Dunning
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 8:41 AM, jan i wrote:
> >
> > > It seems (from the vote thread) you already have solved the pro
+1 binding (assuming its Taverna, and there has been a simple copy/paste
error).
have fun.
jan I.
On 16 October 2014 18:48, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> +1 - binding
>
> I assume that you mean Taverna instead of Lens.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Oct 16, 2014, at 8:
a binary carries the apache name.
of traffic I've seen around clarifying some finer (and not so fine)
> points of release/licensing implication it is about time we start
> an FAQ on that. Me thinks at least.
>
+1
rgds
jan i
>
> Thanks,
> Roman.
>
> ---
).
thanks in advance for your answers.
rgds
jan i
On 5 November 2014 15:05, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Since incubation the following members were voted in as commiters.
> •2014-08-28: Ruslan Ostafiychuk added as a committer
> •2014-08-25: Raghav
did expect more spread in the
community, has there over time been tried to recruit people from outside
these companies ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> Regards
> Srikanth Sundarrajan
>
> > Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 15:36:29 +0100
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Falc
t
overweight to control everything is seen (and are) a negative effect,
anything
that can reduce that is good.
I think the maturity model is good, but to used with care. If I think of
the same podling as Dennis, that would clearly be a test done too early.
rgds
jan i.
>
> - Dennis
>
r ask than have to cut a new release candidate).
rgds
jan i.
tools would be desirable to use.
I want to make sure I have not overlooked a policy or rule.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: jan i [mailto:j...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2015 12:04
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: third party
responsibility to the board.
The Chair cannot and should not be able to "nudge" more than any other PMC.
rgds
jan i.
>
> I can also imagine the maturity model items being used on an exception
> basis, only reporting maturity-model deviations and how they are being
> addresse
tually those test cases will be rewritten.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Background: We have (accidentally) a dependency to a snapshot version
> for a library but only in maven scope.
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
contain the test we cannot see it as broken, or ?
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>
the
IPMC vote.
rgds
jan i
>
> Andy
>
> On 05/08/15 12:11, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> The Apache Taverna Incubator PPMC has voted +5 to release
>>
>> Apache Tavern
o share all the community aspects (emails, commiters, etc.)
This makes perfect sense to me, and having one community delivering 2
different releases is not a problem, at the most some logistic issues.
Look forward to the vote.
rgds
jan i
ps. I too would recommend to start with a smalle
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
On Monday, August 10, 2015, Dave wrote:
> The Usergrid project has made three releases from the Incubator (1.0.0,
> 1.0.1 and 1.0.2), has added multiple and diverse committers, and the
> project has completed all required items on the graduation chec
dline, as it is does not seem to
interfere with the additional work with the report.
>
> Multiple other sections of the report need to be updated and the
> podlings.xml file updated as well.
I note especially it is not signed off by any mentors, that would be a no
go for me, and a new report
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 7:19 PM, jan i >
> wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 11, 2015, John D. Ament > wrote:
>
> > I would not be so strict with the deadline, as it is does not seem to
> > interfere with th
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Friday, August 14, 2015, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, P. Taylor Goetz > wrote:
> > Following the discussion thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE for
> > Accepting Apex as a new Apache Incubator projec
+1 (binding)
rgds
jan i
On Saturday, August 15, 2015, Brian Cho wrote:
> Thank you Chris and Justin for your thorough checks.
>
> We could really use a third IPMC vote :)
>
> -Brian
>
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
making our first release.
rgds
jan i.
-- Forwarded message --
From: jan i
Date: 23 August 2015 at 10:10
Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] incubator_corinthia_release_0.1
To: "d...@corinthia.incubator.apache.org"
Hi
I am pleased to announce that we can continue with our releas
Sorry I did mean to write:
Vote runs at least until Thursday 27th August or continue until we have the
needed 3 +1.
rgds
jan i.
On 23 August 2015 at 10:24, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> The corinthia podling have voted on a release and would now like the IPMC
> to vote.
>
> We t
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On Friday, August 28, 2015, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Tim, there were a couple of additional IPMC votes you can close the vote
> with a result thread:
>
> http://markmail.org/thread/h7pwrlvoousj6x2q
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim B
Hi
thanks for voting,
we have 3 +1 , 0 +0, 0 -1.
We will continue making the release artifacts.
rgds
jan i.
On 23 August 2015 at 13:43, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - signatures and hashes correct
> - file names contain incubator rather
Hi.
I really like our open way of reporting using the wiki but we have a small
flaw in the procedure.
The wiki is not the place to report a section, so I
will send it to private@i.a.o and hope it will be included.
rgds
jan i.
On 29 August 2015 at 01:00, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Greeti
ut I will
post it on private@ and I think it is something we should formalize
(podling and private)
Sorry John, not going to write in public what content it is, that is
private :-)
(as member You know where to look anyhow)
rgds
jan i
>
> - Shane
>
> >
> > John
> >
> > O
+1 (binding)
have fun
rgds
jan i
On Tuesday, September 1, 2015, moon soo Lee wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM Atri Sharma > wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> > On 1 Sep 2015 04:43, "Edward J. Yoon" > wrote:
> >
>
w you to do
similar work
off hours, if not granted it is considered a contract breach and in any
case copyright belong
to the company.
I had many problems with exact this part in my companies. We ended up by
writing a generic
disclaimer to all, that what they did off hours, belonge
se
> interested in ODF.
>
As far as I can see ODF Toolkit is written in Java, so it is not that easy
to use the code.
The philosophy of ODF Toolkit also seems quite different than the
filters/lenses of Corinthia.
But of course corinthia need all the positive attention it can get.
rgds
jan i
hoping that will change! :-)
>
That has changed a lot, I have been with embedded controllers for about 20
years, and the difference is like black and white. I used to work for very
big companies and they promote opensource quite heavely(which was my part
of the business).
But looking
new home.
rgds
jan i.
t you and bertrand goes in to help, but it would have been
great if you had supported the mentors and believed what we as mentors told
IPMC.
Sorry for a strong mail, but seeing a Podling go down the drain for
something that should be logical caused me to respond like this.
Rgds
jan i.
>
english speaking communities…at least that was
not the ASF I saw when I joined.
rgds
jan I.
On 11 November 2016 at 08:14, Jeff Genender wrote:
> I would think that English is generally used because its the most
> international language, not because its the most used in the world. Thus
>
technical base, but the lack of community
growth is a major concern for me. Would it not be wise to postpone the
graduation, and get the community to grow first ?
Why do you think graduating will give growth or even more visibility ?
rgds
jan i.
> From: John D. Ament
> To: &quo
Hi Seetharam
No need for apologies, we are all humans. Its nice though to see a logical
explanation.
Hope you are well now.
rgds
jan i.
On 6 November 2014 07:54, Seetharam Venkatesh
wrote:
> Apologies, I don't know how I missed it. I had voted it earlier but
> apparently th
t; even with this small community, and AFAIK Kevan Miller who's the other
> active mentor shares this opinion.
>
I am still sceptical with regard to the small community, but Bertrand's
words convinced me that there are no further benefits for devicemap to be
in incubator.
so I am al
+1 binding.
rgds
jan i
On 6 November 2014 18:49, Colin McCabe wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Colin
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
> wrote:
> >> Following the discussion ea
+1 (binding)
jan i
On 6 November 2014 17:50, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1.
>
> Alan.
>
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> November 5, 2014 at 5:48
> Hi all,
>
> We wrapped up the vote on the Apache Falcon dev list in which the
> community expressed its desire to graduate t
Hi
Sounds interesting, but I am wondering why not do it within the existing
james project ?
rgds
jan i.
On 7 November 2014 11:02, Brian Antao wrote:
> Hi ya Apache Folks,
>I would like to get your initial reactions to a New Project that I would
> like to propose -- "Th
On 9 November 2014 17:41, Reza wrote:
> So this vote closes with 4 binding +1:
>
> Bertrand D., Kevan M., Mark S., and Dave F.
>
> Jan I. did express he favored this, but did not explicitely give a +1.
>
ups my fault (or my keyboards), I meant to give a +1.
rgds
jan I
>
&g
esults.
>
Noting the vote result is strongly recommended, since it gives the rest of
us a chance to follow when what is released.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: gene
is probably the right way to get to that state.
>
a TLP need min. 3 active PMC, so if there are only 2 active it cannot work.
I would ask the project for a plan (max. 3month) or accept going to attic.
rgds
jan i.
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 7:52 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
>
> >
+1 (binding)
jan I
On Nov 11, 2014 1:21 AM, "Anatole Tresch" wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for the feedback thus far on the Tamaya proposal. Based on prior
> discussion, I'd like to start the vote for Tamaya to be accepted as a new
> incubator project.
>
>
ike to see that
happen before the vote is completed and not just before next release which
does not have a deadline.
+1 (binding), IF the donation reflect the ASF copyright, see above.
rgds
jan I.
On 12 November 2014 22:50, David Nalley wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Bertra
t) to the files, and no
later than the first release".
In my opinion its important that all changes to the code happens after the
license header is in place.
>
> Do people agree? Shall we reformulate that requirement to better
> express that it's only 1) that's relev
hanges are done with the old license, and as a
consequence, headers can only be changed with the written approval of the
original donator as well as the people who have made changes later
(independent whether or not they have filed a icla).why do we want that
extra complication.
Remeber the lice
goals", that the project should get
committers from outside of the circles you mention, to ensure diversity in
the project.
rgds
jan i
On 20 November 2014 06:27, Brock Noland wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> I know you've done a tremendous amount of work to make this happen so I am
> extre
interesting as we progress
> to see how we can best integrate with projects like Camel and I am looking
> forward to hearing some of the thoughts and ideas the community comes up.
>
Thanks for the explanation, but just to be sure, similar/overlapping
projects is not a problem per se, the only
ng our own service will only marginally provide us with something
better, and will cost (in endeffect) contractor resources, so I agree with
david.
rgds
jan i.
>
> -Bertrand
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-u
+1 (binding)
have fun
jan i
On 22 November 2014 at 22:55, Joe Witt wrote:
> John,
>
> I've added the volunteering mentors. Updated the IPMC membership status of
> the mentors. Updated the CLA status of the contributors. I'll stop doing
> so now though to avoid any co
> Does anyone mind if I rephrase the page to make it mandatory to use the
> wiki for proposals?
>
+1. to be honest I thought it was mandatory.
rgds
jan i.
>
> John
>
to release or should we somehow reactivate the vote?
>
It has been a week of apacheCON, where many of us have been busy, and I am
still catching up on mails, but let me help out.
+1 (binding).
So please proceed with the release.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Best regards,
> Kasper
>
> _
t; enforce.
> Cumbersome regulation favors the establishment, and we want to foster
> innovation by newcomers.
>
I think I am a bit lost here, or we talk in reality about 2 themes.
I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
have 1 common place where to look
On 23 November 2014 at 19:41, Alan Cabrera wrote:
>
> > On Nov 23, 2014, at 8:40 AM, jan i wrote:
> >
> > I dont want to criminalize anybody, but on the other hand I would like to
> > have 1 common place where to look for accepted proposals.
> >
> &g
e original
supporter. I believe a proof of concept might end up showing this could be
very simple.
I dont have spare cycles to help with this, but I am available anytime for
questions/test etc.
rgds
jan I.
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 21/11/14 21:27, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote:
>
&g
hope to get feedback.
Remark I have added all initial committers to this mail, since not all are
subscribed to general@.
Please find the complete text below:
On behalf of the Corinthia team
jan I.
== COPY ===
## Proposal
The goal of Corinthia is to provide a responsive design editor (co
# Nominated Mentors
Jan Iversen.
Since jan is involved in the project, it would be beneficial to have at
least a second mentor with a "outside" view, who can help focus on the
administrative logistics.
### Sponsoring Entity
Incubator IPMC.
=========
Sorry about that, please
Hi.
Can I please have access (actually I think the right word is restored) to
incubator wiki.
My userid is "janIversen".
thanks in advance
rgds
jan i.
I did not have that luck. I registred again, and now how to wait for
someone to add me to the contributors group.
Rgds
jan i.
On 25 November 2014 at 19:17, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Ahh! Same here.
>
> The odd thing is that it seems to remember my “old” userid and so I’m able
>
I went the simpler way, I registred again, so now I only hope someone will
add me to the contributors group.
rgds
jan I.
On 25 November 2014 at 19:38, Jake Farrell wrote:
> Anyone having issues with this should open up an infra ticket with the wiki
> component set and someone will take
quot;. But I fail to see the big difference between being
an official shepherd, and just helping a project.
I am sure I overlooked some of the finer differences, or maybe the titles
have just grown out of history.
I am willing to learn !
rgds
jan i.
> > It seems like we have some idle shephe
or for the project. We
look forward to guidance in all the tricky "paper work".
- Talks are being prepared for ACNA.
We are more than happy to answer any questions and make requested changes.
on behalf of the project
jan i
On 24 November 2014 at 22:14, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN T
(after the project is a fact, otherwise we
might have a donation without a project).
Rgds
jan i.
On 26 November 2014 at 15:35, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi Louis,
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts
> wrote:
> > LouisSuarez
>
> You should
ming, test documentation?
looking forward to see you in the project.
rgds
jan i
On Sunday, November 30, 2014, Ian C wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am intrigued by this project. And will sign up once it becomes available
> a real Apache project.
>
> Same as for everyone, making time is the k
+1 binding
have fun
rgds
jan i.
On 2 December 2014 at 16:28, Devaraj Das wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Seetharam Venkatesh
> wrote:
> > Hello folks,
> >
> > This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.6 incubating release.
> &
s some serious points I expect we will hear from him
in a more serious way, until then I assume the mail to be a mistake.
rgds
jan i.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 30, 26 Heisei, at 3:55 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <
> dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
> >
> > I
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
