Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-24 Thread Andy Seaborne
John, Thank you very much for the offer of mentoring - I've added you to the list. And I've renamed the proposal as CommonRDFProposal as that seems to be naming style on the wiki. Andy On 22/02/15 20:56, John D. Ament wrote: Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out.

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-24 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 23/02/15 10:32, Benedikt Ritter wrote: Hello, 2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out. - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) - Solicit support from mentors. It looks like those are the only two

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-23 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello, 2015-02-22 21:56 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament johndam...@apache.org: Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out. - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) - Solicit support from mentors. It looks like those are the only two open issues. Benedikt cannot be listed

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-22 Thread John D. Ament
Lewis, It looks like there were a few things called out. - Identify a champion (looks like you did already) - Solicit support from mentors. It looks like those are the only two open issues. Benedikt cannot be listed as a mentor, as mentioned previously (unless I'm missing an email), but feel

[STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-22 Thread Lewis John Mcgibbney
Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to progress it from status draft to status proposal?

Re: [STATUS] WAS [DISCUSS] Commons RDF to join the Apache Incubator

2015-02-22 Thread Andy Seaborne
On 22/02/15 19:52, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: Hi Folks, I've read through the commentary on the recent [DISCUSS] thread for Commons RDF [0]. It is not clear to me what the outcome was really... can anyone else provide a fresh insight as to where this proposal is going and what is required to