[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-06 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2 vote failed with one +1 binding vote and one -1 binding vote. +1 (binding): John D. Ament (carried over the from Daffodil dev vote) -1 (binding) and reasons: Justin Mclean - LICENSE is missing full text of the licenses, NOTICE contains unneeded informati

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-03 Thread Justin Mclean
HI, > Would you be willing to change to a +1 if I told you I pointed this out to > them on the dev vote I’ll think about it but probably not as it's IMO a serious issue, but others IPMC members (including their mentors) can vote +1 if they think that's OK. It only need 3+1 votes and more +1s

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-03 Thread John D . Ament
Hi Justin, Would you be willing to change to a +1 if I told you I pointed this out to them on the dev vote, Steve didn't understand what I meant, but they created a JIRA to fix it in a following release? John On 2018/03/03 03:23:07, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > -1 (binding) as there’s B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-02 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, -1 (binding) as there’s BSD and other license information in the NOTICE file. Also in general only relocated copyright lines need to be included in NOTICE [1] not the copyright of permissive bundled software. [2] The full license text is not included in the license file. I checked: - incub

[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2

2018-03-02 Thread Steve Lawrence
The Apache Daffodil community has voted and approved the proposed release of Apache Daffodil (Incubating) 2.1.0-rc2. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release. Daffodil is an open source implementation of the DFDL specification that uses DFDL schema