Hi!
I've committed the first cut and updated the website. I'm also
adding a special section to the incubator report calling
out projects where we would require a readout from the
mentors.
I would really appreciate if others can help with making
the docs crisper, etc.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Aug
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...Including the patch below...
Sorry to come in late but I had a look at [1] and it's way too
complicated IMO, and I don't think the
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
... * since I haven't seen much of complaining, can I please commit my
proposed stuff and then we can pile additional edits on top of that?...
Sure, my complaining is more a general issue about incubator.apache.org
On 12 August 2014 09:38, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
... * since I haven't seen much of complaining, can I please commit my
proposed stuff and then we can pile additional edits on top of
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
wrote:
...Including the patch below...
Sorry to come in late but
On 11 Aug 2014, at 10:14, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
With this in mind, I would remove almost everything from the What is
retirement section and keep just
A retired project is a project which has been closed down for various
reasons, instead of graduating as an Apache project. It is no
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
...Including the patch below...
Sorry to come in late but I had a look at [1] and it's way too
complicated IMO, and I don't think the proposed patch helps with that.
In general http://incubator.apache.org/ is way too
Hi!
Sorry for the delay -- OSCON and then a vacation (that was long
promised to my family but never delivered) derailed my legislative
agenda at IPMC ;-)
Attached is the proposed patch to the Incubator website detailing
the policy.
Please comment.
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:47
Seems like attachments are eaten away by general@
Including the patch bellow
Index: content/guides/retirement.xml
===
--- content/guides/retirement.xml (revision 1617182)
+++ content/guides/retirement.xml (working copy)
@@ -64,6
It makes sense. And it also seems to be a decent compilation of the points
agreed in the earlier and lengthy discussion on the topic.
Cos
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 05:22PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
Seems like attachments are eaten away by general@
Including the patch bellow
Index:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:16 AM, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
Is there
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 4:15 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in.
Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings?
I am not sure if there is a
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its something like If a podling is over a year old and not
done a release then retire it.
Almost. What is being proposed is not an immediate retirement,
but rather a vote. So it should really read: If a podling is
On 12 Jul 2014, at 8:05, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
As i've said i don't think thats a
very good rule and doesn't seem like its really been thought through
properly. For example, its kept saying that the podling would go to
This is quite a long thread now so its not that clear what the actual
proposal is now, could you maybe state what the current proposal is?
I think its something like If a podling is over a year old and not
done a release then retire it. As i've said i don't think thats a
very good rule and
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 11:01 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Right, and thats why i don't think a rule like that would be useful.
I still don't quite follow. Are you saying that the rule wouldn't
be useful, or that incubator - attic migration wouldn't be?
If Droids was made to retire
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
about a situation of no releases here. Presumably those
users who are comfortable building from the repo would
just keep doing so. And since there was no release,
On 09/07/2014 09:12, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
about a situation of no releases here. Presumably those
users who are comfortable building from the
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 1:48 AM, Rob Vesse rve...@dotnetrdf.org wrote:
On 09/07/2014 09:12, Chris Douglas cdoug...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Again, why would code lose users? Remember we're talking
about a situation of no releases
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 04:23 AM, ant elder wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for a belated reply -- at first I was following Doug's rule
and then I got
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
Sorry for a belated reply -- at first I was following Doug's rule
and then I got distracted ;-)
That said -- I really would like to drive us to some kind
consensus (even if we have to do the vote) because
the
Hi!
Sorry for a belated reply -- at first I was following Doug's rule
and then I got distracted ;-)
That said -- I really would like to drive us to some kind
consensus (even if we have to do the vote) because
the current situation is simply sad (top 8 project):
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
I'll offer OpenOffice as an example of how long an initial podling
release can take in some cases, due to a number of factors:
I agree with all of your points. Most of all with your final conclusion.
I still can't help but
On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
That said, reminding people of the release often and early thing is
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman
On 25 Jun 2014, at 10:38, ant elder wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 21:27, Rob Weir wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its not enough to just look at release / committer additions.
In the case of Wave, there was a committer addition in the past year.
Still
no commits, nor a
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its not enough to just look at release / committer additions.
In the case of Wave,
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014, at 12:02 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
On 24 Jun 2014, at 7:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its not enough to
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Christian Grobmeier
grobme...@gmail.com wrote:
I think its not enough to just look at release / committer additions.
In the case of Wave, there was a committer addition in the past year. Still
no commits, nor a release. Looking closer you would find that
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 05:54AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
of of the following applies project get
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
of of the following applies project get put to a retirement
IPMC vote:
* there has been a release
Hi,
2014-06-19 8:14 GMT+02:00 Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org:
Hi!
based on a recent thread inspired by observing
some of the podlings, I'd like to kick start a discussion
around making an amendment to our Incubator
policy:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Alexander Broekhuis a.broekh...@gmail.com
wrote:
as the retirement criteria would IMO be too harsh for Celix when we
started.
In a similar vein, Drill currently has about the same number of commits and
mail messages as Hive does, but hasn't had a release in
On 19 Jun 2014, at 14:54, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org
wrote:
To this end, I'd like to prose a very simplistic criteria
for a potential retirement from the incubator: unless both
of of the following applies project get put to a
35 matches
Mail list logo
