Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Holsman is not yet member of the IPMC, However, Voting has now been open for over 6 days with 3 binding +1 votes from Alex, Bertrand, Brett to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant, Jeff, Otis. No -1 votes or 0 votes were cast. you missed my vote Thus, I'm closing this vote as Passed. i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time considering it's decisions. perhaps i should have -1'd earlier to force a re-proposal but most admission votes are left open long enough for every IPMC who has an interest to express an opinion. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator
you missed my vote Yes, Sorry for my carefulness. i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time considering it's decisions. perhaps i should have -1'd earlier to force a re-proposal but most admission votes are left open long enough for every IPMC who has an interest to express an opinion. Thank you for your advice, and yes, that would ne nice. Maybe we can just leave the vote open a bit longer. Thanks, Edward On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Holsman is not yet member of the IPMC, However, Voting has now been open for over 6 days with 3 binding +1 votes from Alex, Bertrand, Brett to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant, Jeff, Otis. No -1 votes or 0 votes were cast. you missed my vote Thus, I'm closing this vote as Passed. i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time considering it's decisions. perhaps i should have -1'd earlier to force a re-proposal but most admission votes are left open long enough for every IPMC who has an interest to express an opinion. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Edward J. Yoon, http://blog.udanax.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Accept Hama into the Incubator
Again, The vote has now, IMO, had enough time to run. (for one week) We had 7 binding +1s, from Alex Karasulu, Bertrand Delacretaz, Brett Porter, Robert Burrell Donkin, Niall Pemberton, Jukka Zitting, Ian Holsman (potentially) to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant Ingersoll, Jeff Eastman, Otis Gospodnetic. No -1 votes or 0 votes were cast. This means that the Hama project has been accepted into the Incubator. Thanks to everyone for taking the time to look at it. Your valuable comments and advices are always welcome. Best Regards, Edward On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: you missed my vote Yes, Sorry for my carefulness. i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time considering it's decisions. perhaps i should have -1'd earlier to force a re-proposal but most admission votes are left open long enough for every IPMC who has an interest to express an opinion. Thank you for your advice, and yes, that would ne nice. Maybe we can just leave the vote open a bit longer. Thanks, Edward On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ian Holsman is not yet member of the IPMC, However, Voting has now been open for over 6 days with 3 binding +1 votes from Alex, Bertrand, Brett to go along with the 3 committer +1 votes from Grant, Jeff, Otis. No -1 votes or 0 votes were cast. you missed my vote Thus, I'm closing this vote as Passed. i'm a little uncomfortable about closing this VOTE so quickly given the low number of votes cast. projects typically end up spending a year or two in the incubator and the IPMC prefers to spend it's time considering it's decisions. perhaps i should have -1'd earlier to force a re-proposal but most admission votes are left open long enough for every IPMC who has an interest to express an opinion. - robert - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Best regards, Edward J. Yoon, http://blog.udanax.org -- Best regards, Edward J. Yoon, http://blog.udanax.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
