Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-27 Thread Amol Kekre
+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 6:35 AM, Shane Curcuru wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Daniel Gruno wrote on 5/24/16 1:56 AM: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-27 Thread Shane Curcuru
+1 (binding) Daniel Gruno wrote on 5/24/16 1:56 AM: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ### PROPOSAL BELOW

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-26 Thread Jim Jagielski
+1 (binding) > On May 24, 2016, at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-25 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator... +1 -Bertrand - To unsubscribe,

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Jake Farrell
+1 (binding) -Jake On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Roman Shaposhnik
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. An enthusiastic +1

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
+1 binding ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Chief Architect Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Henry Saputra
+1 (binding) Have fun guys! On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On May 24, 2016, at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Christopher
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:41 PM Drew Farris wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016, 5:27 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno > > wrote: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Drew Farris
+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016, 5:27 PM Andrew Purtell wrote: > +1 (binding) > > > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Andrew Purtell
+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Luciano Resende
+1 (binding) On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Luke Han
+1 (binding) Very great experience, people love the lists.apache.org when I introduced it to them! Thanks. Luke Best Regards! - Luke Han On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Seetharam Venkatesh < venkat...@innerzeal.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > All the best, > Venkatesh >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Seetharam Venkatesh
+1 (binding) All the best, Venkatesh On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:05 AM Leif Hedstrom wrote: > > > On May 23, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On May 23, 2016, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. +1 (binding). — leif

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread James Taylor
+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Billie Rinaldi wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno > wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > > accepting Pony Mail into the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Billie Rinaldi
+1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Ralph Goers
+1 (binding) Ralph > On May 23, 2016, at 10:56 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > > ###

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Sam Ruby
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. +1 (binding) - Sam Ruby

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Pierre Smits
+1 (non-binding) This is a good approach. In the past we have seen a few TopLevel projects spawned on the basis of its core product being in use as an ASF internal solution without having gone through the incubation proces. Some of these projects lead a marginal existence, don't do releases and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Justin Mclean
+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Jacques Le Roux
+1 (not binding) Jacques Le 24/05/2016 à 07:56, Daniel Gruno a écrit : Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. ### PROPOSAL BELOW

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Myrle Krantz
+1 (non-binding) (Thank you guys for doing this.) *Myrle Krantz* Solutions Architect RɅĐɅЯ, The Mifos Initiative mkra...@mifos.org | Skype: mkrantz.mifos.org | http://mifos.org On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Sergio Fernández

Re: [VOTE] Accept Pony Mail into the Apache Incubator

2016-05-24 Thread Sergio Fernández
+++1 (binding) On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > Since it seems the discussion has died down, I am now calling a vote on > accepting Pony Mail into the Incubator. Sorry in advance for potato. > > This vote will run for the usual 72 hours. > >