Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-13 Thread 金吉祥
+1 > 在 2016年11月14日，上午10:29，Liangfei.Su 写道： > > +1 (no bindng)

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-13 Thread zhendong
+1 -- Original -- From: "";<fengji...@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, Nov 14, 2016 07:46 AM To: "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>; Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator +1 iPhone >

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-13 Thread Liangfei.Su
+1 (no bindng) On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:46 AM, 冯嘉 wrote: > +1 > > 发自我的 iPhone > > > 在 2016年11月13日，13:24，Bruno Mahé 写道： > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > > >> On 11/10/2016 08:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > >> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-13 Thread 冯嘉
+1 发自我的 iPhone > 在 2016年11月13日，13:24，Bruno Mahé 写道： > > +1 (non-binding) > > >> On 11/10/2016 08:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: >> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on >> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. >> >> [ ] +1 Accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-12 Thread Bruno Mahé
+1 (non-binding) On 11/10/2016 08:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator [ ] +0 Abstain. [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Julian Hyde
+1 (binding) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Liang Chen
+1 (non binding) Regards Liang -- View this message in context: http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-Accept-RocketMQ-into-the-Apache-Incubator-tp52343p52449.html Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Danese Cooper
+1 (binding) Danese > On Nov 10, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > [ x] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Dong Li
+1 (non binding) Thanks, Dong Li Original Message Sender:Huxing zhanghux...@apache.org Recipient:generalgene...@incubator.apache.org Date:Friday, Nov 11, 2016 20:19 Subject:Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator +1 (non binding) Very glad to see such a good project being

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Huxing Zhang
+1 (non binding) Very glad to see such a good project being brought to the community. I believe that RocketMQ will be guided under the Apache way, towards a more collaborative and global community! On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:03 PM, Xiaorui Wang wrote: > +1 (no binding)

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Xinyu Zhou
+1, cool Today is happened to Alibaba Group’s 11.11 Global Shopping Festival(11.11 FESTIVAL NEWS ), and RocketMQ played a important role in this festival. We hope RocketMQ can embrace Apache and toward a more health,

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Xiaorui Wang
+1 (no binding) RocketMQ help Alibaba dispatch Trillions of messages today(2016), very cool project. On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache

Re:Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-11 Thread Chunhui Shen
- >> >> Luke Han >> >> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Hao Chen <h...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> > +1, good luck. >> > >> > - Hao >> > >> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao <9...@zhaoqun911.cn> wrote: >&g

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread ji luo
; > - Hao > > > > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao <9...@zhaoqun911.cn> wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > From: Quanxi Ji > > > Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 > > > To: general > > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] A

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Luke Han
; > > From: Quanxi Ji > > Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 > > To: general > > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > > +1 > > > > 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda <hustjac...@gmail.com>: > > > > > +1 (no b

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Hao Chen
+1, good luck. - Hao On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Qun Zhao <9...@zhaoqun911.cn> wrote: > +1 > > > From: Quanxi Ji > Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 > To: general > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > +1 > > 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:

Re: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Qun Zhao
+1 From: Quanxi Ji Date: 2016-11-11 11:26 To: general Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator +1 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda <hustjac...@gmail.com>: > +1 (no binding) > > More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are usin

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Quanxi Ji
+1 2016-11-11 10:50 GMT+08:00 Feng Longda : > +1 (no binding) > > More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using > RocketMQ " https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1), I > definitely believe it can provide a good solution to stable deliver > and

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Hust Fxj
> +1 . It’s amazing . Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > >> +1 >> >> >> >> >> -- 原始邮件 -- >> 发件人: "Bruce Snyder";; >> 发送时间: 2016年11月11日(星期五) 凌晨0:41 >> 收件人: "general"; >> >> 主题: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Feng Longda
+1 (no binding) More 100 companies are using RocketMQ(Please refer to "who are using RocketMQ " https://github.com/alibaba/RocketMQ/issues/1), I definitely believe it can provide a good solution to stable deliver and receive message 2016-11-11 10:28 GMT+08:00 冀全喜 <729040...@qq.com>: > +1 > > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread wei zhou
+1 > On 2016??11??11??, at 10:28, ?? <729040...@qq.com> wrote: > > +1 > > > > > -- -- > ??: "Bruce Snyder";; > : 2016??11??11??(??) 0:41 > ??: "general"; > > : [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Jian Zhong
+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 9:42 AM, ShaoFeng Shi wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > 2016-11-11 9:20 GMT+08:00 Zhanhui Li : > > > ++1 > > > > Li Zhanhui > > > > We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For > > the

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread ShaoFeng Shi
+1 (non-binding) 2016-11-11 9:20 GMT+08:00 Zhanhui Li : > ++1 > > Li Zhanhui > > We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For > the past three years, this system helps us deliver more than 2 billion > messages daily. Reliability, scalability, low

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Zhanhui Li
++1 Li Zhanhui We are probably among the first adopters of RocketMQ outside Alibaba. For the past three years, this system helps us deliver more than 2 billion messages daily. Reliability, scalability, low latency and the ability to playback history messages do us a great favor in face of

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Justin Mclean
+1 binding - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 (binding) Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On 10 Nov 2016 4:41 pm, "Bruce Snyder"

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Stian Soiland-Reyes
+1 (non-binding) On 10 Nov 2016 4:41 pm, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread P. Taylor Goetz
+1 (binding) -Taylor > On Nov 10, 2016, at 11:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Leif Hedstrom
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 9:41 AM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Amol Kekre
+1 (non-binding) Thks Amol On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) wrote: > +1 non binding > > > > > On 11/10/16, 10:07 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: > > >+1 non binding > > > >-Myrle > > > >> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Debo Dutta (dedutta)
+1 non binding On 11/10/16, 10:07 AM, "Myrle Krantz" wrote: >+1 non binding > >-Myrle > >> On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament wrote: >> >> +1 >> >>> On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: >>> >>> Subsequent to

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Myrle Krantz
+1 non binding -Myrle > On 10 Nov 2016, at 19:04, John D. Ament wrote: > > +1 > >> On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: >> >> Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on >> accepting RocketMQ into the Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread John D. Ament
+1 On Nov 10, 2016 11:41, "Bruce Snyder" wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do not accept RocketMQ

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > ..Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator... Enthusiastic +1 ! -Bertrand

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Rob Davies
+1 (non-binding) > On 10 Nov 2016, at 16:41, Bruce Snyder wrote: > > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1 Do

Re: [VOTE] Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator

2016-11-10 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
I am +1 (Binding) On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > Subsequent to the discussion on RocketMQ, I would like to call a vote on > accepting RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator. > > [ ] +1 Accept RocketMQ into the Apache Incubator > [ ] +0 Abstain. > [ ] -1