Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Sudarshan Vasudevan
From: Justin Mclean Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 8:38 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2 Hi, Is this the same as the other vote thread? Thanks, Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Might be best to close this one and ask people to vote in the other thread for less confusion. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
Yes :) Abhishek On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 8:38 PM Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > Is this the same as the other vote thread? > > Thanks, > Justin > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, Is this the same as the other vote thread? Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Justin Mclean
Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - LICENSE and NOTICE are fine - DISCLAIMER exists - No unexpected binary files in release - All files have ASF headers - I was not able to compile at first but managed to get (see below) This is the error I get when building via ./gradlew build:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Olivier Lamy
+1 On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 at 07:35, Sudarshan Vasudevan wrote: > Hi, > I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 (Incubating). > > The source release candidate RC2 can be downloaded here: > > >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Gobblin 0.15.0 release RC2

2020-12-07 Thread Dave Fisher
+1 (binding) Incubating in name, Signatures, Checksums, DISCLAIMER, NOTICE, LICENSE, Rat Check using Gradle, Rat Check not using Gradle, Build using Gradle. I noticed that the rat gradle excludes may be too many. Gradle RAT did not slag the MIT code (that I saw, I could have missed something