At 10:10 PM 6/1/2005, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> I'm willing to serve as either mentor or ppmc member, as you will.
>> +1 to STDCXX -entering- incubation.
>
>Glad to hear it. You can help me and Ben help them. =)
>
>It's been
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 09:55:01PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I'm willing to serve as either mentor or ppmc member, as you will.
> +1 to STDCXX -entering- incubation.
Glad to hear it. You can help me and Ben help them. =)
It's been pointed out that mentors should be on the Incubator P
At 06:45 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote:
>William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>Can you give us a sense of the 'currently' supported platforms
>>and compilers?
>
>The C++ Standard Library project has been ported to the following
>compilers and operating systems:[...]
That said, I'm suitably impressed
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Technical issues having been commented on ...
> in light of http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2005-05/msg00134.html
> and its complete thread.
The claims that the ASF has an NIH issue are contradicted by the existance
of the Incubator. These aren't projects invented
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
At 03:43 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote:
GNU libstdc++ is a fine implementation of the standard but its
big limitation is its dependency on gcc. What differentiates
our implementation is its portability to all the other compilers
besides gcc, which on most platform
At 03:43 PM 6/1/2005, Martin Sebor wrote:
>GNU libstdc++ is a fine implementation of the standard but its
>big limitation is its dependency on gcc. What differentiates
>our implementation is its portability to all the other compilers
>besides gcc, which on most platforms other than Linux is still
Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
...
There's at least one open implementation out there now: the GNU STL.
What differentiates the RW codebase from the GNU one? If there are
bugs or performance, uh, deficiencies in the GNU one, why not submit
the changes to the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Heidi Buelow wrote:
>
> Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
>
> Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @ RogueWave
> dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
>
> (0) rationale
>
> The goal of the Apache C++ St
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1
The proposal says that this library has a "complete locale
implementation". I'm wondering about the possibilities for code reuse
when/if we start on a second generation of apr-icon
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
--On Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:38 PM +0200 Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having another mentor or two might be a good idea? We still
haven't ironed out the justin-cloning proces AFAICT :-)
I volunteered i
> -Original Message-
> From: Heidi Buelow
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 6:40 PM
> Ok. I'll have to get back to you on this for the strict legal
> requirements.
> My understanding is that you are right that this HP statement is not
> required in every source file.
Justin summarized this c
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+0
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Sunday, May 15, 2005 1:38 PM +0200 Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having another mentor or two might be a good idea? We still
haven't ironed out the justin-cloning proces AFAICT :-)
I volunteered initially to start the process
On 13-05-2005 23:27, "Heidi Buelow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Kewl. Seems like a big undertaking :-)
(...)
> (5) identify apache sponsoring individual
>
> Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
Which is why having anoth
Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1.
Sander
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
> Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
One other comment that I should make now:
The APR PMC was privately approached about sponsoring this proposal. The
PMC's consensus was that there was not sufficient ove
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
> I saw the HP licensing note below, which seems fine; but, if the
> library was provided by other vendors, can you clarify the state of
> any other IP claims on the initial contribution?
I've been informed that Rogue Wave and HP are t
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
>
> Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
+1. -- justin
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
> -Original Message-
> From: Cliff Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 13, 2005 5:02 PM
> I saw the HP licensing note below, which seems fine; but, if the
> library was provided by other vendors, can you clarify the state of
> any other IP claims on the initial contribut
Heidi,
This looks great. A few notes/questions inline below.
Cliff
On 5/13/05, Heidi Buelow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
> Rogue Wave Software will jump start this project by contributing the
> commercial C++ Standard Library
Big +1 (non-binding)
-Brian
On May 13, 2005, at 5:27 PM, Heidi Buelow wrote:
Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library
Submission date: 12 May 2005, Tim Triemstra, Heidi Buelow (TimT @
RogueWave
dot-com, Buelow @ RogueWave dot-com)
(0) rationale
The goal of the Apache C++ St
21 matches
Mail list logo
