At 09:27 12/2/01 +, Charles Benett wrote:
http://jakarta.apache.org/builds/gump/2001-02-11/james.html
Strange, it wasn't a couple of days ago. And deprecating interfaces
shouldn't break a build.
I think it got too many deprecation messages and busted the compiler/ant.
Will have a
At 04:08 13/2/01 +, Charles Benett wrote:
Hmm. Good idea, but I can't see it working for james, yet. There aren't
enough active james developers to keep up with daily changes in avalon.
James runs fine with the last release of Avalon, 3.1a1.
If you like I could help keep them synched?
How very amusing.
At 11:06 10/2/01 -0800, Jim Driscoll wrote:
The internet, where everyone's an expert.
yes - the biggest people of course are those who wear skippy badges and
loudly claim their excellence. Yes there are lots of experts.
Stop assuming things without checking facts.
right
At 04:06 10/2/01 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I propose a project for testing infrastructure, that covers the needs of
unit testing, stress testing, performance testing, negative testing (i.e.
testing of error conditions), integration testing, and error logging and
reporting.
Stress and
At 11:52 11/2/01 -0800, Jon Stevens wrote:
So, your opinion on JUnit is based on a quote on their website and a quick
glance at it? Give me a break dude.
This is exactly the type of mindset that I despise.
People need to start to learn to work together instead of constantly
re-inventing each
At 07:26 12/2/01 -0500, Ted Husted wrote:
On 2/9/2001 at 8:12 AM Sam Ruby wrote:
I would suggest that you start with a proposed code base.
Going back over the posts, there seem to be at least five clear areas of
overlap:
* DataSource/Database Pool
* XML Configuration
+1
* Message Resources /
Jon Stevens wrote:
I don't even have an idea on how to start to answer him. Someone else wanna
try?
How about something like this?
Many things needed to create sites like this are actively developed
under the wings of Apache projects, most notably the Jakarta and XML
projects. But: there
Peter Donald wrote:
I would also like to hear from the struts bean utils. I haven't looked at
them but I presume they would be general enough (or could be made so) so
Ant2.x could use it (ie remove converter/introspector elemenets from Ant2.0
codebase).
They are -- and they have
The first milestone release of the next version of Tomcat 3.x is available
for download and testing. As a Tomcat 3.x release, it remains an
implementation of the Servlet 2.2 and JSP 1.1 specifications.
In addition to bug fixes, a large amount of refactoring has gone into
Tomcat 3.3m1 since
Ok, sorry I was a bit late on the draw here, while I doubt my
programming skills are up to snuff, I would love to help out
with the following in any way I can:
DATASOURCE/DATABASE POOL
+1 I can test the heck out of these and perhaps help with a bit of the
documentation...
SUBPROJECT
"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote:
I haven't voted yet in this thread because I haven't seen anyone else say
"let's figure out the process issues first." I guess it's not as interesting
as writing code :-), but it is very much as important to a shared resource like
this.
My thinking on the next
David Weinrich wrote:
Ok, sorry I was a bit late on the draw here
Glad to have you aboard, David, especially since as near as I can
figure, you're the one that started this thread!
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@jakarta.apache.org/msg00018.html
(This time, at least ;-)
-Ted.
Ted Husted wrote:
There are many packages which would make good candidates for the
library. To find a starting set, I simply looked for packages where
there was already overlap. But, if no one disagrees, let's hereby amend
the POLL to include
--
[Struts] Bean Introspection support -
Hi Sam,
I (think ) I got gump to work, it's not updating/building. There are few
issues/sugestions. I tried to find the alexandria list ( I assume the
discussion on gump happens on alexandria ), I'm sure it is somewhere and
I'll keep searching :-)
Anyway - it would be possible to switch
Ted Husted wrote:
Also in the usual way, these discussions could take place on
an interim list (off Jakarta) to which the proposed committers,
and other interested parties, can subscribe.
Why off Jakarta?
Whilst this group seems to have difficulty agreeing on anything grin,
perhaps a
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Call it 'Rupert'.
Be careful, that name might stick. ;-)
I mean, with Tomcat 4, nothing really guarantees that you
won't abandon Servlet 2.3 for the Wiggly Green Spec from
Planet Mongo, but I trust that you will stick to your
'mission'... :)
The are *SOME*
Copying alexandria-dev.
Others can run builds with stable dependencies. They are permitted, and
even encouraged to do so using Gump. The runs I have been making are to
determine the impact of changes - something that I think that has not
received enough attention, and so that's why I have been
Sam Ruby wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Call it 'Rupert'.
Be careful, that name might stick. ;-)
That would be fine - forward progress! I guess the logo would be
next... :)
I mean, with Tomcat 4, nothing really guarantees that you
won't abandon Servlet 2.3 for the Wiggly Green
Sam Ruby wrote:
Whilst this group seems to have difficulty agreeing on anything grin,
perhaps a proposal to create a new list could get enough support? Heck, it
might even get some +1's from people that DON'T want to be subjected to
this discussion any more. ;-)
Ok, based on the response
Ted Husted wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Whilst this group seems to have difficulty agreeing on anything grin,
perhaps a proposal to create a new list could get enough support? Heck, it
might even get some +1's from people that DON'T want to be subjected to
this discussion any more. ;-)
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
You might think then that each partition could manage it's own issues,
like the projects do.
So given
http://www.mail-archive.com/general@jakarta.apache.org/msg00154.html
are we on the same page, Geir?
Basically, I just want to nest everything we do for
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
Sam Ruby wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Call it 'Rupert'.
Be careful, that name might stick. ;-)
That would be fine - forward progress! I guess the logo would be
next... :)
I mean, with Tomcat 4, nothing really guarantees that you
won't
Others can run builds with stable dependencies. They are permitted, and
even encouraged to do so using Gump. The runs I have been making are to
determine the impact of changes - something that I think that has not
received enough attention, and so that's why I have been and will continue
--- "Craig R. McClanahan"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Geir Magnusson Jr." wrote:
[snip]
And back to the issue, that is kinda my point : if
you have a group of
developers committed to producing a top quality db
connection pool for
general use, it's not clear that there is much one
could
Has anyone noticed any problems accessing the CVS repository?
It has been taking 1+ hours to update "jakarta-ant". ( Choosing ant as an
example ).
Tim
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Jon Stevens wrote:
on 2/15/01 2:19 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Turbine's pool (still) does not do
this -- and that makes perfect sense, because it existed before the DataSource
API was standardized. Changing Turbine's pool to conform to this would break
the
on 2/15/01 3:24 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
However, I would not recommend it ... the turbine-pool.jar file drags along
~40 classes of Turbine infrastructure that aren't useful unless you are
running inside Turbine.
What *exactly* is the problem with that?
Of course,
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I just don't want to work with you (and the attitudes you carry)
on Turbine.
Hmmm.
As release manager of Tomcat 4.0, you appear quite willing to ship code
that he (and the attitudes that he carries) has committed to that cvs tree.
But code that the same person
Ted Husted wrote:
may we please have a interim Jakarta "libary" mailing
list for the purpose of formaling the details of a
proposal for this subproject.
Are you sure that you want to call it that. ;-)
Beyond the typo...the name of the mailing list should match the name of the
subproject.
Sam Ruby wrote:
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
I just don't want to work with you (and the attitudes you carry)
on Turbine.
Hmmm.
As release manager of Tomcat 4.0, you appear quite willing to ship code
that he (and the attitudes that he carries) has committed to that cvs tree.
You
Ted Husted wrote:
may we please have a interim Jakarta "libary" mailing
list for the purpose of formaling the details of a
proposal for this subproject.
Are you sure that you want to call it that. ;-)
Beyond the typo...the name of the mailing list should match the name of the
31 matches
Mail list logo
